Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh Hell, Prosecuting Non-Terrorists Using Anti-Terrorist Law..SHIT!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Praetorian Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:16 PM
Original message
Oh Hell, Prosecuting Non-Terrorists Using Anti-Terrorist Law..SHIT!
Edited on Tue Jul-22-03 07:33 PM by Praetorian
That's just about all I can say! Shit!

Ashcroft and Hitler wannabe Dubya are getting their way........again!
:mad: :puke:

Anti-terrorism statute may fight meth labs
By David Ingram
JOURNAL REPORTER
Sunday, July 20, 2003
Frustrated by drug laws that he thought were not tough enough on methamphetamine producers, prosecutor Jerry Wilson decided to examine the books.

Wilson, the district attorney for Watauga County, and members of his staff started flipping through legal texts and precedents in the past few weeks until they found what they were looking for - a law with more teeth.

Instead of a drug law, though, Wilson turned to the state's antiterrorism laws when prosecuting accused methamphetamine producers. The laws, specifically a statute passed in November 2001, detail the penalties for manufacturing a nuclear or chemical weapon. Wilson's office filed what are believed to be the first charges using that law last week.

'We sat down and began looking for something more that we could use as a weapon against these people, and that's the statute we found,' Wilson said. Since Wilson's decision other prosecutors have followed his lead and said that they will also prosecute methamphetamine producers under antiterrorism laws.

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v03/n1070/a03.html?999
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. praetorian
Please edit this to four paragraphs and provide a link, as per DU copyright rules.

Thank you,

lazarus, DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Praetorian Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Lazarus
Thanks for the reminder.

Many apologies, I forgot the rules in my fit of rage!

Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link Request
May we have a link? This needs to be brought to the attention of newspaper editors throghout the state (and everywhere, really). A link would be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Meth is a 'chemical weapon'? Give me a f*cking break
USA leadership careening out of control...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Well, meth labs DO have a nasty habit of blowing up on occasion
but I don't think it's intentional

Next target: Illegal fireworks manufacturers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. They'll get laughed out of court
No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Praetorian Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think so....It's in Texas and sure to see a Bush Appointee!
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. North Carolina
actually...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RustyShackleford Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Court...lawyers...trial...
if they violated the "Patriot Act" couldn't they just be sent straight to Guantanamo and the Tribunals???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. FASCISTS!!!!!!!
DEATH TO THE PATRIOT ACT! NO LIFE TO PATRIOT ACT 2!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. yup
first the drug dealers, than the child pornographers, then the environmentalists and animal rights people, by then abortion will be illegal, so then the abortionists, anybody else I should include in there before they come for the liberals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. yeah, Gays and Unionists
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texican Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Not First
ASScroft and his buddy Chertoff have been using these laws to arrest and prosecute extreme right wing group memebers. They use any excuse under these laws to prosecute them and put them in maximum security facilities, even though they may just have violated some silly technical BS. There have been some incredible examples of this. The one that is best known is the Chester Doles case, although he may have actually committed a crime. I won't link to it, but it is getting a lot of publicity.
The laws were always intended to spread terror throught the general population. They indeed will be used against anyone who is not on the right side of the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. not surprising and completely outrageous!
:grr: _|_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Happens every time
A law is passed and pretty soon it's being used to prosecute completely unrelated things. Funny, the outrage seems to depend on a person's particular view of the crime. People don't always get upset over it, not even here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. They've already used them to track Texas Democrats
Edited on Wed Jul-23-03 09:06 AM by jobycom
That was the part of the whole Homeland Security/Killer Ds story that was missed. The Homeland Security department was using powers granted it to fight terrorism-- powers that were allowed to violate many of our rights to protect our "safety"-- to fight a political battle. If they can get away with that, it's over.

It's been over since December 12th, 2000, as I've been saying. We're just the chicken who hasn't realized our head has been cut off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Misuse of anti-terrorist laws becoming routine?
1) Used against online credit card transactions from an e-bay subsidiary

2) Homeland security dept. used to track Texas Democrats

3) Now, for prosecuting meth labs

and, according to Dr. Brit Williams, people who tamper with election machines will be prosecuted as terrorists. But then, he's turning out to be a somewhat less than credible source.

When does this legislation sunset? Ever?

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. One more
You forgot using the Homeland Security laws to track Child Pornographers.

This is truly the slippery slope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Is this supposed to be a surprise
If you didn't see this coming when they passed the "Patriot" act, you are really slow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Unpartiotic
I was one of those UNPATRIOT types who opposed the damned thing!

So was my Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC