|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
number six (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-01-03 05:19 PM Original message |
Attention Statisticians - Iraq - When's Critical Mass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-01-03 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Arguably we are already there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number six (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-01-03 05:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Right. I should probably reword things - a draft would be pretty critical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Screaming Lord Byron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. The actual number of US infantry in Iraq is pretty low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 09:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. huh?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Screaming Lord Byron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 09:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Sorry. No actual danger of running out of manpower. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. I thought I read that critical mass would occur in March of 2004... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedEarth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
7. An army general on one of the morning news shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Screaming Lord Byron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. As I understand it, the units in Iraq are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 10:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. this mess raises the chances for a nuclear exchange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. Someone has already looked into this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Screaming Lord Byron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-03-03 11:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. If we calculate as a percentage - we're looking at 81,000 combat troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC