Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Fisk: One, two, three, what are they fighting for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 04:22 PM
Original message
Robert Fisk: One, two, three, what are they fighting for?
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=03/10/25/0079565

One, two, three, what are they fighting for?
The worst problem facing US forces in Iraq may not be armed resistance but a crisis of morale. Robert Fisk reports on a near-epidemic of indiscipline, suicides and loose talk

By Robert Fisk

Oct 24, 2003: (The Independent) I was in the police station in the town of Fallujah when I realised the extent of the schizophrenia. Captain Christopher Cirino of the 82nd Airborne was trying to explain to me the nature of the attacks so regularly carried out against American forces in the Sunni Muslim Iraqi town. His men were billeted in a former presidential rest home down the road - "Dreamland", the Americans call it - but this was not the extent of his soldiers' disorientation. "The men we are being attacked by," he said, "are Syrian-trained terrorists and local freedom fighters." Come again? "Freedom fighters." But that's what Captain Cirino called them - and rightly so.

Here's the reason. All American soldiers are supposed to believe - indeed have to believe, along with their President and his Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld - that Osama bin Laden's "al-Qa'ida" guerrillas, pouring over Iraq's borders from Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia (note how those close allies and neighbours of Iraq, Kuwait and Turkey are always left out of the equation), are assaulting United States forces as part of the "war on terror". Special forces soldiers are now being told by their officers that the "war on terror" has been transferred from America to Iraq, as if in some miraculous way, 11 September 2001 is now Iraq 2003. Note too how the Americans always leave the Iraqis out of the culpability bracket - unless they can be described as "Baath party remnants", "diehards" or "deadenders" by the US proconsul, Paul Bremer.

Captain Cirino's problem, of course, is that he knows part of the truth. Ordinary Iraqis - many of them long-term enemies of Saddam Hussein - are attacking the American occupation army 35 times a day in the Baghdad area alone. And Captain Cirino works in Fallujah's local police station, where America's newly hired Iraqi policemen are the brothers and uncles and - no doubt - fathers of some of those now waging guerrilla war against American soldiers in Fallujah. Some of them, I suspect, are indeed themselves the "terrorists". So if he calls the bad guys "terrorists", the local cops - his first line of defence - would be very angry indeed.

No wonder morale is low. No wonder the American soldiers I meet on the streets of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities don't mince their words about their own government. US troops have been given orders not to bad-mouth their President or Secretary of Defence in front of Iraqis or reporters (who have about the same status in the eyes of the occupation authorities). But when I suggested to a group of US military police near Abu Ghurayb they would be voting Republican at the next election, they fell about laughing. "We shouldn't be here and we should never have been sent here," one of them told me with astonishing candour. "And maybe you can tell me: why were we sent here?"

MORE...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Why"?
Well, now there's a darn good question! Perhaps it should have been asked a year ago when the corrupt Bush administration was so hell-bent on selling this invasion as part of the "war" on "terror." Wouldn't it have been nice to see a few contrary voices raised in the halls of Congress, asking serious questions about this invasion, its motivations and what it was realisitically trying to accomplish.

But no. People who asked questions were compared to bin Laden or Hussein. They were marked for ridicule in the media, painted with broad strokes as "traitors" or "unpatriotic", killed in plane crashes or defeated in the elections.

Now, thousands of deaths later, no "exit strategy", and the hurrieder we go, the behinder we get, we have the media focusing on Kobe and his meaningless reception at a meaningless exhibition basketball game. We hear about Lil George and his meaningless attempts at diplomacy. And a hundred other meaningless things to keep us diverted from the meaningful deaths of troops and civilians in Iraq. It's not stylish or sexy to talk about attacks and deaths; certainly not like it was to talk about "shock and awe" and the meaningless news conferences of Baghdad Bob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuB Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the absentee ballots from the military
mysteriosly disappear we'll know the truth. I have to doubt very seriously a military person stuck in Iraq away from their family and home, with a very good chance of dying! would in a majority vote for this idiotic Bushie policy and stupid for pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Robert Fisk is a treasure.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC