|
Found on google from news group postings.
From end of text-
"McCarthyite tactics are typical of Emory. His smears must be
stopped before more reputations are decimated at the expense
of all who care to know the truth about the workings of
federal intelligence groups and world fascism."
What do you make of it?
Dave Emory's Politics of Acrimony
By Alex Constantine
I know you're on bended knee waiting for me to hand you down
the truth." - Dave Emory KPFK-FM, Los Angeles May 10, 1990
Every Thursday morning at midnight, the Superman theme song
rises and ebbs behind the euphonic voice of "Something's
Happening" host Roy Tuckman. The program airs over
Pacifica's KPFK-FM in Los Angeles, an alternative, Tuckman
boasts, to the claustrophobic conservatism of
corporate-sponsored talk radio. "Something's Happening"
attempts to expose organized corruptions of government, and
Tuckman is a passionate political voice. But his attempt to
provide an alternative is marred by his choice of
programming: Dave Emory, originating from KFJC-FM in Los
Altos Hills, has bullied and slandered his way to late-night
radio talk show prominence, splintering the reputations of
his fellow political researchers and reporters to advance
his own. More serious are the allegations of C. (name
withheld upon request, co-host of a political affairs radio
program in the Santa Clara area), that Emory, in a
late-night telephone call, filled her ears with graphic
descriptions of sexual violence. She had been for several
years his friend and an outspoken supporter. They were both
students and allies of late political researcher Mae
Brussell. C. was severely rattled by Emory's threats of
sexual mutilation. Emory, in response to a direct
confrontation with her, did not deny that he phoned her, but
did claim he had no recollection of the episode. If so,
perhaps he also has no recollection that he later phoned one
of C.'s radio station co-workers to ask if she had repeated
anything Emory told her. The co-worker slammed down the
phone. I informed Tuckman of the incident in a letter on
June 6, 1991, and suggested that he call C. for
confirmation.
Tuckman ignored the letter. Martin Cannon, author of The
Controllers, a study of the classified federal mind control
initiative and its masquerade as alien abduction phenomena,
also informed Tuckman of the harassing phone call. He told
Tuckman that Emory had said "monstrous and violent things"
to her. Cannon's letter was also snubbed. Barbara Honneger,
a political investigator living in Monterey, stated in a
letter to Emory: "No radio station should keep you on the
air if this continues, and no radio station should keep its
license which keeps you on the air if this continues." I
share Honegger's revulsion.
Dave Emory's mentor, Mae Brussell, was a courageous
investigator of political assassinations, a tenacious critic
of government. She inspired a modest but devoted audience to
probe the American far-right and its pernicious influences.
Among the researchers who worked with Brussell and
posthumously expanded upon her foundation of political
research were Honegger, John Judge, Emory's former co-host
Nip Tuck, and Will Robinson & Marilyn Colman, hosts of
KAZU's "Lighthouse Report." All were staples of Tuckman's
program. Emory's past is seldom discussed. His father,
writes Paul Bernardino, host of a cable television program
in San Francisco, "committed him to an institution and
narcotics program 20 years ago. Emory has told several
people, including Tom Davis (a northern California book
retailer) that he was sexually abused in a prison in Boston.
He has attempted suicide several times via cars and
narcotics. His emotional problems drove him to overdose on
narcotics in a 1988 suicide attempt."
This was the year that Mae Brussell fell prey to cancer.
Emory, her self-appointed successor, began a series of
vincictive slander campaigns to purge other researchers from
the air. His first straw man was Nip Tuck (an alias, today a
very popular science fiction writer), Emory's co-host on
"Radio Free America" for several years. Tuck was publicly
denounced as an "agent" of an unnamed arm of government.
This smear was based on the slimmest of "ties": Tuck once
taught English at a military base. This alone rendered him
suspect in Emory's mind - yet he later acknowledged to a
Christic Institute activist that he'd known of Tuck's
background all along. That Tuck was a lackey of the
intelligence sector was repeated on KPFK, unsubstantiated
but delivered as bald fact. The victim of this smear
vigorously denied the allegation in a letter to KPFK. The
station ignored it. Tuck found himself groundlessly
discredited, humiliated, his written denial censored -
despite the fact that over the years his conspiracy research
had grossed tens of thousands of dollars for
publicly-supported KPFK. Emory's next victim was John Judge,
a popular prot=E9g=E9 of Mae Brussell. Abuse heaped upon Judge,
says Bernardino, was the result of "personal jealousy," an
opinion I share. So does Jonathon Vankin, a former staff
reporter for the San Jose Metro, in Conspiracies, Cover-Ups
and Crimes:
Judge had managed to get himself some lecture bookings and
onto radio talk shows. According to Tom Davis, a long-time
friend of Brussell's whose mail-order book service is one of
the best sources for political books, Judge and Emory had
been competing for radio kudos since at least 1984.
Moreover, Brussell appointed Judge, not Emory, to the
position of curator/archivist. Excluded from plans for the
library bequeathed to Judge, Emory lashed out. Personal and
professional envy was the foundation of his belief that
Judge was an "intelligence agent" and a "Nazi murderer" with
"ties" to the Manson Family. The charges have never been
retracted. Emory opened his fusillade at Judge in a
November, 1989 blast on KFJC. He announced with an imperious
air, "There's a bit of unpleasantness I'm going to have to
take care of...." The Mae Brussell archives were being
catalogued and organized. It was not ready to open to the
public. Emory set out to destroy it and its curator, John
Judge, before the doors could open. "One of the things I
wondered about," Emory declared, "in the creation of the Mae
Brussell Research Center, was how long it would take the
intelligence community to gain effective control of that
center." In fact, the directing board was composed of
friends and associates of Mae Brussell. Nevertheless, he
arrived at the conclusion that it had been overrun by the
CIA: "There is an intelligence presence at the Center now
that is so massive as to render the whole thing little more
than an intelligence front." He produced no evidence to
support this startling allegation. He remained vague. "There
is a very sinister presence," he charged, "there are
elements affiliated with Aryan Nations." The "sinister
elements" were phantoms: Emory had learned that Judge once
delivered a talk at a Santa Monica debating club owned by a
right-wing extremist, a connection too weak to support such
serious allegations. Hammering together a guillotine with a
post of smears and planks of innuendo, Emory claimed that
there were "indications of serious financial impropiety" at
the center. What's more, "there are indications that have
yet to be finalized that the whole thing has disintegrated
into nothing more than a great big criminal enterprise." A
devastating revelation - and no "finalized indications" to
back it up. In fact, the financial impropiety he spoke of
largely amounted to nothing more than Judge spending money
he'd raised himself for the Mae Brussell Research Center. He
spent some of the proceeds from his own fund-raising tour on
meals, though there is some truth to the charge that a
portion of the funds were misspent. According to Robinson, a
director of the Center, Judge did nothing criminal. Yet
Emory carried on as though he had information too explosive
to air publicly - "investigative tributaries," he said - and
had no qualms about divulging the results of his
"investigation." Emory's carving knife sank into the
Center's finances. "Under no circumstances would I recommend
that people have anything to do with the Mae Brussell
Center," Emory said. He insisted that all supporters demand
back their contributions, repeating there was "a strong
intelligence presence there." Who? "You might as well send
your name to Langley or to Tom Metzger so he can put it in
the Aryan Nations Liberty Net," he said. The intelligence
"presence" was "specifically Nazi-linked." A week later, the
charges were repeated in a telephone conversation with Roy
Tuckman in North Hollywood.
This time, Emory claimed that John Judge was a "murderer."
As always, he didn't trifle with evidence, simply stated
that there were more "investigative leads" that bookish,
soft-spoken John Judge had committed murder. Unfortunately,
to this day, only Emory knows anything about it. The
allegations grew more and more fantastic. On Tuckman's May
10, 1990 program, he charged that Judge and the Mae Brussell
Center were an extension of the ultra-right Western Goals
operation, an industrially-sponsored covert operations group
responsible for much havoc in underdeveloped countries. A
week earlier the Center had been allied with Aryan Nations.
Now it was Western Goals.
"Beyond that," he told Tuckman, "there are two evidentiary
tributaries leading in the direction of the Manson Family."
Now it was Manson. But what were the "tributaries" that so
alarmed Emory he was moved to denounce Judge and the
Brussell archives? The "evidentiary" links, he said, forced
him to ask "very, very serious questions about the Center."
He let on, as though divulging a dark secret, that Judge had
ties to "several murders in the Carmel area." He has never
stooped to explain his meaning. "I'm not accusing any
individual," Emory said, incredibly, "but there are serious
questions implicating individuals - including and especially
John Judge." He again suggested that supporters of the
library sever all contact and demand a refund. Listeners,
believing that Emory's vagaries must have some foundation,
withdrew support for the center. It collapsed. Judge sent a
strong letter of denial to Tuckman. Like the others, it was
ignored. Judge, once a favorite of the program, was publicly
humiliated and drummed off the air. In 1992 Judge denied, in
a Santa Cruz newspaper, that there was any substance to the
charges. He said that he'd been "hounded out of Brussell Research Center] by this kind of nonsense." In the
same story, Dave Ratcliffe, a Center director, laughed at
the notion that it had any connection to the government,
extremist groups or satanic cults. He chalked up the
allegations to "Dave Emory loving to spin very detailed,
wonderful sounding scenarios that are of his own invention."
Vankin's view was that "whatever the objective reality of
the Mae Brussell Center controversy, the version that
navigates Dave Emory's brain is another of his many
traumas."
Emory's attacks on Paul Bernardino, a political researcher
and AIDS activist in San Francisco, culminated shortly after
the fall of John Judge. In January, 1989, Bernardino
received a call at 2:00 a.m. from an enraged Dave Emory. "I
hope all you faggots drop dead with AIDS," he snarled. Like
Upton Sinclair with a reeking slaughterhouse in his sights,
Emory went on to blast Sara Diamond, formerly of KPFA-FM in
Berkeley and an Emory critic, for carrying on a hidden life
as "a CIA agent" and "a whore who gives cheap blow jobs." On
the air, Emory accused Bernardino of taping an unauthorized
tribute to Mae Brussell for his television program. Emory,
Bernardino wrote in a public denial, "was too lazy to simply
pick up his phone to do some checking before impulsively
mouthing off." As it happened, permission for the taping was
granted by Brussell's daughter. Bernardino protested Emory's
"slandering, wilfully and maliciously maligning my ... name
and character." Once informed that he'd erred, Emory refused
to retract or apologize. Instead, he claimed that Bernardino
was fronting for "the Gay Mafia." He referred to Bernardino
as "a homo from Mexico" and "a CIA agent." He further
charged that Bernardino had far-right political connections.
"Such dangerous, mud-slinging lies," Bernardino lamented. He
voiced an opinion that radio personalities have an
obligation to "keep their personal vendettas, mud-slinging,
unfounded hate, spite and personal attacks off the air." Pat
Carey, a volunteer working for Bernardino, supported him in
a letter to KFJC dated May 22, 1991. Emory, she wrote,
"claims quite falsely that Bernardino had called for a
boycott of his program, which is absolutely not true. He
also claims that our cable TV program on Channel 25 in San
Francisco ... started from Aryan Nations, which is an
outright lie, a fabrication." She demanded equal time to
refute these "lies." Her ire was echoed by Brette McCabe,
hostess of the television program, who noted the "purposeful
cruelty" in the public condemnation of Paul Bernardino.
Despite these protests, Emory continued to tell stretchers
on the air about well-intentioned political conspiracy
programmers. Pam Burton, a KPFK programmer substituting for
Roy Tuckman one week, refused to play "Radio Free America" -
she thought it laden with self-importance. "I see radios
going off all over town," she grumbled off the air. Emory
learned that he'd been pulled and branded her "a CIA agent."
(Critics must be federal intelligence agents out to destroy
him.) His denunciation of any detractor as an "agent" was
taken up by Martin Cannon in his May, 1991 letter to Emory:
"Interestingly, while your practiced eye has gleaned
unmistakable evidence of federally-funded malevolence, this
evidence remains invisible to everyone else." Cannon
pondered "why you have never bothered to offer any proof of
your accusations" against Tuck, Judge and Bernardino.
Emory's most venomous campaigns were reserved for Barbara
Honegger, author of The October Surprise (a detailed
reconstruction of the Reagan/Bush hostage debacle) and a
close friend of Mae Brussell's. When Brussell died of
cancer, Emory accused Honegger of murdering her. He has
never offered any public explanation for his widely-spread
belief that Honegger killed Mae Brussell. In her June 10,
1991 response, Honegger wrote, "You have committed the
unspeakable offense of stating to numerous parties that I am
somehow responsible for Mae Brussell's death." She
explained, "I tried and tried, as did many others, to get
Mae to see medical specialists ... without success." No one,
Honegger emphasized, "tried more than I did to try to save
Mae's life." The murder accusation "both saddens and sickens
me," she wrote.
With "Nazi murderer" John Judge bounced off the air, Emory
turned a jaundiced eye to Honegger. Her reputation was
golden in conspiracy research circles. At first, her book
was ridiculed by left and right alike as a dubious theory.
But official leaks concerning the hostage deal caught the
attention of the press. Honegger's primary source of
information, Richard Brenneke, a former CIA pilot, was
acquitted in a trial arranged by the Bush administration to
discredit his account of the flight to Paris. All of this
lent credence to Honegger's investigation, and she became a
familiar voice on the radio talk show circuit. In L.A., she
was a welcome guest at KFI-AM and Pacifica. It was on
Tuckman's program that Emory proceeded to carve into her.
Drawing upon articles written by Harry Martin of the Napa
Valley Sentinel, Emory contended that self-proclaimed CIA
pilot Gunther Russbacher actually flew George Bush to the
October Surprise negotiations with Iranian officials. Since,
Emory and Martin have reached the conclusion that Russbacher
was not the pilot after all, precisely as Honegger insisted
in the first gusts of Emory's defamation storm - but only
after branding her a "liar" for doubting the allegations.
Harry Martin has since become a key source of information,
providing Emory with material for his radio program, as
Brussell once did. Harry Martin is a former Republican
activist. The corporate press ignored his series on
Russbacher, but it has been featured in the Liberty Lobby's
Spotlight. The Village Voice couldn't reconcile the many
glaring contradictions in Russbacher's story. John Whalen, a
journalist Emory respects, wrote in the San Jose Mercury on
July 11, 1990:
Depending on whom he is talking to, Russbacher has claimed
to have flown Ronald Reagan, George Bush, William Casey or
just himself to or from the Paris meetings, frequently
changing his tale when confronted with contradictions. When
a reporter at a major daily reminded Russbacher that SR-71
pilots and passengers require hours of pre-flight medical
preparation and special flight suits - making it unlikely
that Bush would go to the trouble when a conventional jet
would get him from Paris to America without all the fuss -
Russbacher abruptly revised his plot line, claiming that,
actually, he hadn't flown Bush home.
Emory had linked Tuck, Judge, Bernardino, Diamond, Burton
and now Honegger to covert branches of government. The
allegations have tarnished their reputations in southern
California. Yet Harry Martin, one of Emory's primary
sources, is the former publisher of Defense Systems Review,
a DoD mouthpiece staffed by past CIA Director Eugene Tighe,
former CIA Deputy Director Bobby Ray Inman, and Paul Cutter,
alleged by the FBI to have sold arms to Iran on behalf of
the Reagan NSC. Emory publicly excoriates Honegger for
boarding Reagan's 1980 election campaign and briefly serving
in his administration, denounces her as an "agent" - and
ignores Martin's known links to the loftiest levels of CIA
covert operations without a flinch. In July, 1988, months
before Emory's tirades began, Mae Brussell received this
letter from a Napa Valley resident concerning Harry Martin:
Dear Mae Brussel:
I understand you're quite knowledgable on the CIA's
activities. We have a person - Harry Martin - in my
hometown, Napa, who has been publishing a small weekly
newspaper, The Napa Sentinel, for the past 2 1/2 years, a
newspaper that purports to be a champion for the little
people, but actually has covert ties to Napa's development
interests. What really bothers me, however, is Martin's past
ownership of Defense Systems Review and Military
Communications, an international publication that went to
congress, the president, the U.S. military, the defense
industry and foreign governments. It's quality was the equal
of Newsweek, and it had ads from major defense companies.
Although listing Napa as its publishing address, I doubt,
considering its sophisticated layout, that it could have
been printed in Napa (it was mailed from Los Angeles). The
magazine, besides promoting weapons, supported Reagan"s
Central American policy. By his own admission, Martin had
contacts with the intelligence agencies of Western Europe
and Israel.... Some of the deceptive practices he is using
in his newspaper have aroused my suspicions he might be
involved with the CIA. There is a further possible link, a
Sentinel columnist named Mike Savage. Savage was a talk show
host (a program ironically called "Doubletalk") on our local
radio station, KVON, for several years until he resigned in
1987 (supposedly after the acceptance of a book he was
writing Doubleday), and became a columnist for the
Sentinel. Savage ran for the Napa City Council in 1986,
listing a BA in political science and an MA in psychology
from the University of Denver in his campaign ads. Savage
was not elected, but ran again in 1988. However, this time a
reporter for Napa's daily newspaper, The Napa Register, did
some checking and revealed that Savage had no degrees from
the University of Denver. Savage said it was all a
misunderstanding. I've been told by an avid radio listener
that while a talk show host, Savage had more than one CIA
agent as guests. He even arranged for an agent to talk to a
local group. On the radio, whenever he could, Savage
ridiculed citizens who protested against Reagan's Central
American policy. In recent years, Savage has travelled to
South Africa, South America and Europe....
Savage explained that his globe-trotting was financed by
Doubleday in lieu of a book contract. Another local reporter
checked on the story. Doubleday denied that Savage had been
signed. Yet Martin's Sentinel sided with Savage, claiming
the book contract was with another publisher, one he
neglected to name, though he had flatly stated so a year
before. Jonathon Whalen concluded that Martin's work on the
October Surprise required "generous leaps of faith," and was
riddled with "egregeous factual errors, unsupported claims
and misleading attributions." Martin has himself since
admitted that Gunther Russbacher's claims are
"unsubstantiated." Russbacher, who hails from a Nazi gene
pool, was hardly a reliable source. He was, at the time,
serving a 21-month sentence for impersonating a U.S.
attorney. During the trial, FBI agent Richard Robely of St.
Louis testified that Russbacher was an "FBI informant."
Under cross-examination, Robely admitted that the
self-proclaimed CIA pilot was an "infiltrator" for an
unnamed "interagency group." Rae Russbacher, his wife, is
the daughter of a Naval intelligence and FBI undercover
agent. Her first husband was dean of science and engineering
at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey. Martin's
version of the October Surprise was embraced almost
exclusively by Dave Emory and the Holocaust-denying Liberty
Lobby, a spin-off of the World Anti-Communist League. Most
researchers, including Honegger and the press at large, have
poked numerous holes in his story. Yet Honegger's attempts
to demonstrate that Russbacher was a liar were interpreted
by Emory as an "attack" on his own credibility. On June 6,
1991, on Tuckman's program, Emory repeated the accusation
made only by the Russbachers that Honegger was an FBI
informant. No charge could be more damaging to her career.
On June 10, Honegger wrote a letter of denial to Emory:
I have learned last week, as a guest on KPFK in southern
California, you stated on the air that I was or am an "FBI
informant." That is both false and absurd. No FBI informant
goes on the radio three to five times a week as I do
criticizing the current administration which pays the
salaries of FBI informants.... Again, you owe me a written
and aired retraction and apology for this statement.
Emory ignored her denial, and gullible listeners of KPFK
still believe Russbacher's fabricated charge - joyously
echoed by Tuckman and Emory - that Honegger was a snitch for
the FBI. The irony, of course, is that Russbacher was
informing and infiltrating for the Bureau. "Gunther
maintains that he was the October Surprise pilot," Emory
told Tuckman in the June 6, 1991 interview. "That is to say,
he flew Bush to Paris and flew him back. Gunther's
background checks out." In fact, Gunther Russ-bacher did NOT
check out. Emory's animosity toward Honegger blinded him. He
was willing to cling to anybody in his dismantling of
Honegger's reputation. Emory went on to concede that there
were glaring contradictions between Harry Martin's
interviews and a prior taped discussion between Russbacher
and Honegger. He ex-plained these away, noting that
Honegger's interview of Russbacher was conducted at 2:30 in
the morning. "By his own account, was drunk on his tail
feather. Gunther is not the first person to misspeak himself
under the influence of alcohol." Tuckman put Honegger's
conversation with a besotted Gunther over the air (an FCC
violation). Drunkenness is a lame excuse for giving two
diametrically-opposed accounts to reporters about a
historical episode as significant as the October Surprise.
Honegger challenged Russbacher's account on KAZU-FM in
Monterey. Emory and Tuckman interpreted her reservations
concerning
Russbacher as direct assaults on their own credibility.
Emory spoke of Honegger's "vendetta" against him, a peculiar
form of blindness to his own smears. "There are a number of
baldface lies that Barbara Honegger told," Emory announced
on July 11, 1991 on KPFK. After accusing her of mere
thievery and "murder," he maintained she'd insulted him
during the Monterey broadcast with "a fire-storm of
invective, innuendo and outright lies." In fact, Honegger
had said little about Emory. She had simply identified holes
in Russbacher's story, explained why he could not possibly
have flown Bush to Paris. Tuckman mentioned that Honegger
threatened to sue him. "Yeah, well, she threatened to sue me
too," Emory said. "I basically told her to piss up a rope,
and she hasn't done a thing about it." Having declared
falsely that "Russbacher's credentials check out," on this
evening Emory offered his expert opinion that "Gunther's
situation may be b.s. On the other hand, maybe not." But
Honegger, he charged, had "muddied the waters with her
personal bitterness." The grim irony of all this was not
lost on me. At this time, I had my own political program,
"The Constantine Report," which aired on KAZU in Monterey
(and, briefly, two years before on KPFK in L.A.). I had
collected taped broadcasts by both Honegger and Emory, and
concluded that Emory was attempting to bump her off the
airwaves as he had others by undermining her credibility
with bizarre accusations. I began writing a series of
letters to Tuckman, calling attention to the lameness of the
charges against Honegger. I pointed out obvious errors in
Emory's wild accusations, asked him if he really believed
Judge and Honegger were guilty of murder. For my trouble,
Tuckman sent the letters to Emory, who accused me of being a
"CIA agent." The charge was made in a private phone call to
Will Robinson, host of "The Lighthouse Report," Monterey's
answer to Tuckman's program. "This Constantine guy is no
fucking good," Emory spat. "You're going to have to learn
friend from foe. The problem is you don't listen to advice.
You can just take a humble attitude, listen to what I say
and follow orders." Emory gave Robinson an ultimatum: either
strike "The Constantine Report" from the playlist, or Emory
would not permit his own tapes to be played on KAZU.
Robinson chose to keep my program. Emory is no longer on the
KAZU roster. In his taped conversation with Robinson, Emory
took credit for purging me from Tuckman's program in L.A.:
"I put the kibosh on Constantine, " he crowed. A crowning
irony of his attacks on myself is that he considers one of
his "most important works" to be a reading of William
Pepper's book on the Martin Luther King assassination - a
point-of-view I covered comprehensively two years ago, when
James Earl Ray filed for a retrial, citing developments from
news sources in Mississippi and the UK. The stories aired
over KAZU for several weeks. In other words, I've already
done Emory's "most important" research. Emory was profiled
in Jonathan Vankin's Conspiracies, Cover-Ups and Crimes,
described by Robert Anton Wilson as "the most exciting book
on conspiracy theory I've read in this decade." The San
Francisco Chronicle called it "a lively and provocative
book." In it, Vankin relives Emory's rebuttal to the
unflattering coverage. Emory's obsession with the book, and
with me personally it would seem, culminated (although not
concluded) with two consecutive five-and-a-half hour
broadcasts - eleven solid hours of otherwise valuable
airtime - devoted to lambasting me. Feigning the high road,
Emory pretended that my alleged "hit piece" didn't bug him.
He did feel moved, however, to describe me as a
"front-running yuppie pantywaist," whatever that means.
Emory accused Vankin of plotting with the Moonies to ruin
him. Vankin described the eleven-hour tirade as "a personal
vendetta for an imagined slight," and related how Emory
lumped him in with "Moonies, right-wing tax protesters, the
anti-Semitic 'Identity Christianity' movement, John Judge,
and most amusingly, the alternative newsweekly where I work,
Metro (a "masturbation vehicle for yuppies"). Emory, who is
prone to thinking himself a bit of a martyr, said the likely
result of Vankin's book was "a possibility of physical
violence and mind control." Lately, the basso, self-obsessed
McCarthyite of the near-left characterized Noam Chomsky, a
studied critic of U.S. foreign affairs, as a leading
proponent of "the fascist third position in America." He
also diagnosed Tom Davis, the book merchant, as "senile"
without the benefit of a physician's consultation. This was
the week that 65-year-old Davis, then keeper of the
voluminous Brussell archives, gave all 33 filing cabinets
and a mountain of political books and tapes to researcher
Virginia McCullough. Emory had already announced on the air
that he was working on procuring the files from Davis.
Losing them to McCullough, yet another researcher with whom
he'd had a falling out, must have been a bitter loss.
McCarthyite tactics are typical of Emory. His smears must be
stopped before more reputations are decimated at the expense
of all who care to know the truth about the workings of
federal intelligence groups and world fascism.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
