majority rule. The other half is election reform. It is wonderful that so many good people are running for office in Texas, but they need to be warned--if they don't already know--about electronic voting systems run on "TRADE SECRET," PROPRIETARY programming code, controlled by Bushite corporations, with virtually no audit/recount controls. They need to know this for obvious reasons, but also, a) so that they and their supporters won't be disappointed, and won't give up, when they lose an election they should have won; and b) to gather election fraud evidence, challenge suspicious results and work long term for transparent elections.
Many will likely be defeated by means of the fraudulent, non-transparent election system. One of the worst things that happened in '04 was that Bush's phony win smashed and demoralized the magnificent grass roots movement that had developed to oust the Bush junta. That movement had given the Dems a blowout success in new voter registration, nearly 60/40 in 2004. Basically, Kerry could not lose with registration numbers like that, if the grass roots got out the vote (which we did), and if independents and Nader voters went for Kerry (which they overwhelmingly did). I think this kick in the head to the antiwar grass roots may be partly why Dem Party leaders never warned us about Bushites controlling vote tabulation with secret code--they didn't want a president who was beholden to the antiwar grass roots. (--lots of Dems thick into the war profiteer hogfest). That's my feeling about it, anyway. Pro-war Dems, plus bipartisan corruption in the $4 billion HAVA boondoggle. Their silence about this fraudulent election SYSTEM otherwise looks like insanity.
But now we know. The election system is non-transparent, controlled by Bush partisans, and extremely difficult to audit. We have to be prepared for very unfair losses, while we keep fielding candidates, keep voters involved, and dog our election officials demanding transparency and auditable counts. I think some races can be won despite the fraud, by sheer turnout. (The electronic voting companies and their advocates don't want things to get too obvious*.) And election challenges--where good evidence can be gathered--can lead to reform.
For an easy to read pamphlet on the perils of electronic voting ("MythBreakers"). (One of the myths is that HAVA mandated electronic voting; it did NOT; citizens and election officials still have a choice!)
www.votersunite.org
For a project for statistical monitoring and challenges of elections in '06 and '08:
www.UScountvotes.org
Russ Holt's bill HR 550 will stop the corporate privatization of our elections in its tracks, and reverse it. It has 169 co-sponsors (mostly Dems). Sign the petition.
http://www.rushholt.com/petition.html*See Bob Koehler's article about the recent Ohio election reform initiatives, predicted to win by 60/40, but flipped over into 60/40 LOSSES on election day--the worst flipped vote yet:
http://www.tmsfeatures.com/tmsfeatures/subcategory.jsp?file=20051124ctnbk-a.txt&catid=1824&code=ctnbkFor the recent GAO report on the grave insecurity of our election system in 2004:
access to pdf:
http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/abstract.php?rptno=GAO-05-956text only:
http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05956.htmlFor more info: www.verifiedvoting.org
For analysis of the 2004 election results (and exit polls):
www.TruthIsAll.net
News updates on election fraud/reform:
http://www.solarbus.org/election/index.shtmlFor how these Bushite electronic voting companies are corrupting state/local election officials with lavish lobbying, see this recent example--a week of fun, sun and high end shopping at the Beverly Hilton for election officials from around the country, sponsored by Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia, this August:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x380340------------------------------------------
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."--Josef Stalin