I'm seeing a lot of headlines/OpEd pieces about "Imperial Presidency".

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

In different papers.

This is good. It needs to be hammered home that George Bush has assumed the powers of a dictator or emperor, and this is starting to be done.

Are you seeing this in papers where you are?

[EST]

1. Not yet.

I keep looking for "credibility gap."

[HereSince1628]

2. No, but this is about a week old and it's sprouting, not losing legs

The Conyers blog is going to rip through the blogosphere. Sunday will probably see more constitutional experts weighing in. By Monday this is going to still be in blossom.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

4. It shouldn't require the blogosphere to get the "Bush=emperor" word out,

as it is already prominently featured in the Washington Post and NY Times etc.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/23/opinion/23fri1.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901554.html

[leftupnorth]

3. I am

from the middle finger of michigan, right wing fundie heaven, the gaylord herald times:

http://www.gaylordheraldtimes.com/articles/2005/12/21/news/opinion/opinion02.txt