Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Jerry Nadler demands Special Counsel to Investigate Eavsedropping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:53 AM
Original message
Rep. Jerry Nadler demands Special Counsel to Investigate Eavsedropping
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 09:58 AM by Armstead
On Hannity and Colmes last nite, he also said "If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."




http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny08_nadler/SpecCounBushSpy121905.html



From Press Releae by Cong. Jerry Nadler (D NY)



Nadler Demands Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Illegal Eavesdropping Operation

order to spy on Americans without a warrant”
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) today demanded that Attorney General Gonzales appoint a special counsel to investigate the President’s apparent violation of law in asking the National Security Agency to eavesdrop, without warrants, on Americans’ international phone calls.


In a letter to the Attorney General, Nadler pointed to the language in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that prohibits electronic surveillance without warrant of any communication “to which a United States person is a party.”


“The President’s speech Saturday indicates clearly that he no longer considers himself subject to the laws he is sworn to uphold,” Congressman Nadler wrote. “It is unconscionable that the President would authorize the NSA to spy on Americans without legal authority, in violation of the Constitution and of the law – and that he states brazenly that he will continue to do so.”


The Republican-controlled Congress has repeatedly proven its unwillingness to investigate the Administration’s actions. The appointment of a special counsel would put the fact-finding mission in independent, unbiased hands. “Only in this way can we hold the President accountable and protect American liberties,” Nadler wrote.


The full text of Congressman Nadler’s letter to Attorney General Gonzales follows:




The Honorable Alberto Gonzales
Attorney General
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20530

December 19, 2005


Dear Attorney General Gonzales:


I write to demand that a special counsel be appointed to investigate the President’s secret directive that authorizes domestic eavesdropping on United States citizens, without a warrant, by the National Security Agency (NSA). This unprecedented intelligence gathering policy is clearly prohibited by law.


The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 USCA §1809) provides that a person who “engages in electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by statute’ is ‘guilty of an offense . . . punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.”


It further states that:


“(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that – . . .


(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is party;” (§1802)


The President’s assertion in his weekly radio address Saturday morning that there is nothing wrong with his secret directive to eavesdrop, without first seeking warrants, on international phone calls originating in America, indicates clearly that he no longer considers himself subject to the laws he is sworn to uphold. It is unconscionable that the President would authorize the NSA to spy on Americans without legal authority, in violation of the Constitution and of the law – and that he states brazenly that he will continue to do so. His refusal to accede to the warrant process – and, therefore, to the Fourth Amendment – is an affront to the Constitution and the American people.


Neither the President himself, nor anyone else in the White House can authorize an order to spy on Americans without a warrant. Since the President stated that the Attorney General and the White House counsel were part of the decision to initiate this eavesdropping, they cannot carry out an investigation.


The President and his Administration must be compelled to obey the law and to cease violating the President’s Constitutional duty to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” I strongly urge you to appoint a special counsel to investigate these actions by the President and his associates. Only in this way can we hold the President accountable and protect American liberties.


Sincerely,




Jerrold Nadler
Member of Congress

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo, Mr. Nadler.
Keep up the good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah Jerry, 2006 here we come nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
He doesn't get as much visibility as some, but he's usually on the correct side of isues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Say it often; say it loud.
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."

"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
"If we had an honest Congress, we'd be looking into the possibility of impeachment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. 'nuther kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Paging Mr. Fitzgerald.... paging Mr. Fitzgerald.... n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC