Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Need Some Help Here - When Did Bush Begin His Eavesdropping Program???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:09 AM
Original message
I Need Some Help Here - When Did Bush Begin His Eavesdropping Program???
I need to freeper-proof an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's part of the problem...nobody knows...
Secret government isn't accountable to the people.

For all we know it began January 20, 2001.


Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. My guess is on Sept 12th, 2001.
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 12:17 AM by Rainscents
I don't know, I'm sure, it was soon after 9/11/2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. we don't know the exact date but it was ca Aug 21, 2002
when Ashcroft filed the first appeal of a FISA warrant in 24 years re Truongh

http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/082102appeal.html

which gave them a reason to go around--

personally, I think they started right away after9/11 2001 or sooner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think probably shortly after the Patriot Act was passed. For
a real answer, we need to hear what the outraged and (1) resigned judge ha(s)ve to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. He said after September 11. But he lies about everything.
So, who really knows? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, it was probably more like Jan. 20, 2001... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. The NYT had it beginning in 2002 originally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sept 18th wasn't it? 2001?
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 12:36 AM by insane_cratic_gal
<snip>

President Bush to use military force in response to the destruction of the World Trade Center and a wing of the Pentagon. The congressional resolution of Sept. 18, 2001, formally titled "Authorization for the Use of Military Force," made no reference to surveillance or to the president's intelligence-gathering powers, and the Bush administration made no public claim of new authority until news accounts disclosed the secret NSA operation.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122202119.html

I say that because he claims this piece of legislation actually granted him powers for wiretaps which it did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. If it had in fact granted him the power to wiretap ...
... it would have made the news in a major way. It would have been talked about just as much then, and argued about whether it was the right thing to do, as the current revelation of his illegal wiretapping.

David Corn of The Nation, or Kos, or Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo, and certainly on DU we would have caught that expansion of power.

Such BS from bush. It's disgusting how he is constantly looking at history through the warped perception of his dictatorial ambition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But in 01
people were still blinded by the horror and fear of 9/11. If he'd said it was just to keep us safe (hijackers were in America, might be more evil-doers) many people might not have objected, even ones who are objecting at recent disclosure.

I bet bush gang was surprised Congress wouldn't grant it right after 9/11. Fear works well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. True
But it still would have made the news, and that is why bush is being proven to be such a liar now, claiming that he brought this matter before Congress when clearly he didn't.

Yes, sadly, fear works very well. I expected the jingoism after September 11. I was surprised at how easily Americans were cowed into subservience to an incompetent leader. Quite an eye-opener. The continued willingness to give up civil rights is such a dishonor to those who died in the "land of the free and the home of the brave."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Solely because the dates keep changing.....
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 12:43 AM by icymist
we can all assume that the begin date started shortly after Jan. 20, 2001. I don't trust this guy and never did. Just because he's president, does that make it any difference? I always assume my phone line tapped and my goings monitored. It's sad, I know, but that's life after the USSR and America changed places!

edit for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. In late 2002 to spy on demcrats, running in elections and through 2004
He will never appear in front of a court, he can never tell he'd be in real deep shit if it ever got out...right now...they'll keep throwing up smokescreens until one works and ride it out until it goes bye-bye like everything else he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks everyone...
Your replies have helped tremendously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC