Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BRAD BLOG: Amidst Intense Drama, St. Louis County Rejects Diebold!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:00 PM
Original message
BRAD BLOG: Amidst Intense Drama, St. Louis County Rejects Diebold!
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 08:02 PM by BradBlog
Amidst Intense Last-Minute Drama, St. Louis County Rejects Diebold!
Citizen Activists, Increasing Concerns about Diebold Security, Company Integrity Said to Have Been Key to Decision!


ALSO: FOIA Requests Filed About Closed-Door Hearings, Concerns Emerge About ES&S, the Company Chosen Instead of Diebold, and a Diebold Lobbyist Reportedly Inquires About BRAD BLOG...And FAMILY!!!

Add St. Louis County to the growing list of Elections Boards around the country who have now rejected Diebold, Inc. voting machines in the last-minute scramble to select new election hardware prior to the Jan. 1, 2006 Help America Vote Act deadline to have such "upgrades" paid for with Federal tax dollars.

The bad news for the once-great, now-disgraced Diebold, Inc. of North Canton, Ohio, comes as the latest blow in a growing string of disappointments for the company which last week saw the resignation of it's CEO, the filing of several Class Action Securities Fraud lawsuits and the devasting revelation that their voting machines can be easily hacked allowing the results of Diebold elections to be completely reversed.

The loss of the contract in St. Louis County, who chose to go instead with Election Systems and Software, Inc. (ES&S) -- a company which itself is coming under increased scrutiny -- is estimated by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to be at least $9.6 million.

The last minute decision came amidst intense lobbying by both citizen's election integrity advocacy groups and paid Diebold lobbyists, at least one of whom was reported to have been inquiring about both The BRAD BLOG itself and the financial background of the father of yours truly!...

FULL STORY:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002189.htm

ALSO, LATE-BREAKING...We are receiving word that Diebold is now pulling themselves out of North Carolina! More now at BRAD BLOG on this as well at:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002190.htm

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution has begun...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

*** The BRAD SHOW On the Air via RAW RADIO!
*** http://www.BradShow.com
*** Broadcast coast-to-coast and around the globe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup, ES&S is not to be trusted either--nor any entity that tabulates our..
...votes with "trade secret," proprietary software.

You look at it and you think, are these election officials INSANE?

But then you look at the billions and billions of dollars that Bush's "pod people" in Congress (and collusive Democrats), and state legislatures, both Puke and Dumb, have thrown at this TERRIBLE CONVERSION OF OUR ELECTION SYSTEM TO NON-TRANSPARENT VOTE COUNTING, and you begin to understand.

I sure wish we could get our money back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hats off to Friedman the Elder.
And you too, Junior. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC