Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy/Sununu agreement: 6 month extention of Patriot Act!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:06 PM
Original message
Leahy/Sununu agreement: 6 month extention of Patriot Act!
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 09:07 PM by ticapnews
C-SPAN 2 now

Kennedy will now speak for 15 minutes.

It looks like there will be 30 minutes of debate, followed by three votes which will apparently be done BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. No ROLL CALL VOTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a victory for our side! Chimpy's in a box now.
...now that he's 'bout to be backhanded in full view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. ...What?
If I read correctly our democratic reps agreed to have it extended... how is this a victory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Our side wanted a 3 mos. extension in order to "work out the problems"
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 09:16 PM by jefferson_dem
while chimpy wanted no such temporary extension, and actually threatened (or intimated at least) a veto. The pukes tp of "the dems killed the patriot act" will be MOOT.

This may not be our perfect end-game but it is a political victory nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. How is extending this fascist piece of shit a "victory"?
It expired on the 31st, and they should have let exactly that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Have you seen the House version???
That was the alternative today. The House version, which is horrific, or extension of the Patriot Act. Now there is a chance to pass the alternative Senate bills that have ACLU support and even the support of Feingold. This was a HUGE win today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. *sigh*
We've been shafted yet again by our own reps but I'm quite sure someone here will try to convince me that this is all for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I would prefer that it expire and they then pass the positive aspects
of the PA in January. The problem with leaving these laws on the books is that it holds out the chance that the entire PA will be made permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. because it is
Even Feingold supported extension of some provisions of the Patriot Act. This is and will clearly be seen as a defeat for Chimpy.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Leahy has said "no one wants this Act to expire" . Speak for yourself
clown. Overall, this law is bad for America. If there are any good parts to it, they should be brought up separately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. We have to look at the "Big Picture" wherein
most Americans don't follow politics like we do......They just know the Patriot Act protects Americans from Terror......If we let it expire...the rhetoric would be 24/7 how Democrats were against protecting our borders, if we get attacked, it's the Democrats fault...la la..la....you know the tune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. ummm, right. It would have been like saying it was wrong to invade
Iraq in 2003... gotta pay attention to the polls.

The fact remains with Leahay's help, the Patriot Act, with its attack on civil liberties, lives on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. stop. learn. listen
There was no chance. Repeat. No. Chance. That the Patriot Act in its entirety was going to expire. Exactly zero members of Congress -- Democrat or repub -- supported such an outcome.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. They have been
In a bill called the SAFE Act and a bill already passed by the Senate. That's why fighting the House vesion has been so important, and we won, it didn't pass. So they're extending the Patriot Act and forcing the House to come back and pass these other bills that are support by most of the Senate, including Feingold, and the ACLU too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gosh, another "victory" like we got with 3 judges and Roberts.
Kinda like the firing squad shooting you with only 4 bullet rather than the traditional 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is in fact a victory
The purists on this thread are useful for yelling and screaming and taking the hard-line: the hard-line is necessary on the Patriot Act, but it is distinctly impractical at this time. The mere six-month extension takes away a major Administration talking point while reinforcing that the Act is fundamentally flawed and cannot stand as permanent or even long-term law. That's a victory. There are now six months to hash out what works about the act and what it fundamentally undemocratic. During this time, we will have to step up the rhetorical war against it, and that's a good thing.

Now, will Bush veto a six-month extension? The ball is in his court. I suspect that he'll end up thanking the Congress and pretend that it was his urging that got this compromise worked out, though that would be a half-truth at best. The truth is that some of the provisions of the Patriot Act are useful (the money laundering provisions, primarily), and so we should take a measured stance on it. But it is by and large terrible legislation and should be stricken. The compromise holds both these possibilities open, while stripping Bush of a campaign point. This is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's kind of like the ruse LBJ used in Vietnam.
"News reports have said that I've authorized 100,000 for Vietnam. That's silly. I'm only gonna send 50,000." And,the apologists called it a "victory" for the peace movement.

Subjecting the citizenry to 6 more months of draconian laws and then being hoodwinked into an open-ended "Patriot" act as a "compromise" isn't a "victory" for anyone but the politicians, the military, and the "intelligence" agencies that spy on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Oh stop it
A six-month extension is probably the best we could hope for politically. It forces Bush to put up or shut up on his pledge to veto any temporary extension, and thoroughly corners him on the "even one minute" rhetoric. It's a good gambit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. This might be why so many people don't vote
I'm not worried about the people who don't vote because they don't care about politics. I worry about people who would vote but don't because of these situations. They may find both the Democrats and Republicans adopting positions that disagree with their own personal positions, so they are left with no other choice in a system that allows only two political parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Cool. If this means we will be checking Bush's assertions on ...
... the Patriot Act for six months, that is definitely a victory. His bluff would be called. I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Right! Well said.
It may not be what we all want but it's a huge political win...especially considering we are a minority party in both chambers.

Chimpy has said he will veto a temporary extension. Now, let's see if he's a man of his word and a president who really KILLS the patriot act or is he a flip-flop waffling emperor who has no clothes at all. His choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. ...so what happens AFTER 6 months?
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 10:10 PM by 951-Riverside
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. We get back to square one
buit we do that, while we get spygate, treason gate and other gates yet to emerge... the environment will be even less charming for the boy who wanted to be king
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I think this might be good move... lets see, in 6 months, full blown
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 11:15 PM by Rainscents
election mode... people will pay attention is to what is going on and this will be all over the TV ari wave! By the time 6 months rolls around, there will be lot of people hating Bush and it would be prefect time for this to come to full blown on people's TV screen! Perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. SAFE Act, Senate Bill
We go to work educating the public on the Senate versions that will protect our rights.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.1709:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. It's on the back burner for now. A victory. Now back to "Spygate".
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 11:02 PM by oasis
:bounce::popcorn::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Sponsored by Halliburton and Exxon Mobil.....
:popcorn: :tv:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is anyone else worried that if Bush doesn't get his renewal
of the stupid Patriot Act, he will blow something else up so he can say "I told you so?". And God only knows how fast the Congress and public would cave if that happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. So you are saying we should support the unPatriot Act so Bush doesn't
bomb something? (of course, he bombs every day, just not in the US... but i digress).

This is not an arguement for extending the Act, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. reminds me of the argument concerning Iraq some babbled here
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 12:03 AM by thebigidea
"oh, we shouldn't oppose Bush on Iraq because he's going to find the WMD right before the elections and we'll look like big idiots!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Oh God no!
There's no way I support an extension of the "Patriot" Act. I'm speculating on what Bush is capbable of and how Congress would react - everyone but Feingold fell for it the first time. I don't have a lot of faith that they'd ask any questions if there was a second attack. Which scares me more than the thought of Bush blowing something else up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
31. Here's ANOTHER reason why this is a victory for us. Pause as I don my
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC