Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From "It Was Legal" To "I Am Lazy": The George Bush Domestic Spy Story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Marleyb Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:56 PM
Original message
From "It Was Legal" To "I Am Lazy": The George Bush Domestic Spy Story
Another day, yet another new and wholly different explanation from the Bush administration about its illegal domestic spying operation.

In just the last 5 days, we’ve seen 3 separate explanations rolled out from the White House. First they claimed it was legal all along, then when that didn’t fly, they said they had to do it because of a need for speed.

Now that that has been debunked, they are actually claiming they were just too lazy to do "the paperwork." On top of this, they also first told us that the surveillance was only targeted at international calls - but now today, we learn that isn’t true either, and that Americans are under surveillance on purely domestic calls....

When their "it was legal all along" argument didn’t hold water, President Bush called a press conference claiming that he needed to break the law because the operations he was ordering "require quick action."

But then that was debunked too, as observers noted that the special FISA court Bush was legally required to get a warrant from actually allowed the White House to conduct surveillance, and get a warrant retroactively, thus not slowing down the process....

Now, with two swings and misses, the White House is offering up perhaps the most pathetic rationale possible: we were lazy, and we just didn’t feel like upholding the law. The administration is trotting out Michael Hayden, who was NSA director when the surveillance began and is now Bush’s deputy director of national intelligence. The Washington Post reports that Hayden told reporters that "getting retroactive court approval is inefficient because it ’involves marshaling arguments’ and ’looping paperwork around.’"

So now we really see what it’s come to. The law is just a nuisance to these people. They don’t feel like "marshaling arguments" or doing the "paperwork" that the law requires - the law, mind you, that was written to protect people’s civil liberties...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/from-it-was-legal-to-i_b_12692.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. David Sirota comes through with a good article (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm waiting for the ever popular, and predictable
"the dog ate my homework" excuse :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Before witnessing this blatant display of arrogance and hubris
regarding the 4th Amendment and the growing totalitarian mindset of ChimpCo,
I didn't really consider myself in the MIHOP camp with regard to 9/11. Now, I'm frankly open to considering it a possibility. This latest Bush scandal has led me to consider that they could be capable of virtually anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well.... I was too lazy to let the weapons inspectors finish the
damn fine job they were doing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC