Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rockefeller and Pelosi COULDN'T Release Their Letters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:47 PM
Original message
Rockefeller and Pelosi COULDN'T Release Their Letters
Rockefeller and Pelosi COULDN'T Release Their Letters
by DHinMI
Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 12:30:34 PM PDT

It appears that one of the GOP talking points on the domestic spying scandal is to denigrate and even ridicule Jay Rockefeller's and Nancy Pelosi's letters to the White House protesting the spying policy divulged to them in classified meetings. This morning on NPR I heard GOP Representative Peter Hokestra claim that if Senator Rockefeller was really concerned about the domestic spying program revealed last week by the NYT, then he could have done more than write a letter.

Bullshit.

Well, let me clarify that. Rockefeller could have publicized the existence and actions of the program, but if he or any of the other members of Congress briefed on the program went public with their opposition, they would have been breaking the law. To fail to acknowledge that anyone briefed on this program essentially had no way to oppose or publicize the existence of the program without breaking the law is bullshit.
http://www.dailykos.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Figures
Obviously they have something to hide there. Oh well, maybe Fitzgerald can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let me get this straight
* tells congress something in a confidential meeting and then does something illegal which he didn't talk about. He then lies about what he said to justify his illegal action and this is OK. But if the congress members present at the meeting make their objections known this is somehow breaking the law. I wanna see THIS one play out in the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There are a lot of Catch 22s out there. Take the Plame case.
To violate the intelligence law the person outing an agent must know that the agent is covert. If a reporter contacts the CIA and asks if So-n-so is a covert agent and they are the CIA can't confirm it. All they can say is don't use the name. The reporter uses the name anyway and can't be charged because they didn't KNOW the agent was covert because the CIA couldn't tell them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. repukes can't figure out why Dems won't break the law
repukes break the law all of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, they KNOW that Dems won't break the law
or reveal classified info, that's why they classify everything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. They couldn't even consult with a lawyer as to it's
legality...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC