Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Officials Fault Case Bush Cited (also poll)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:12 PM
Original message
LAT: Officials Fault Case Bush Cited (also poll)
WASHINGTON — In confirming the existence of a top-secret domestic spying program, President Bush offered one case as proof that authorities desperately needed the eavesdropping ability in order to plug a hole in the counter-terrorism firewall that had allowed the Sept. 11 plot to go undetected.

In his radio address Saturday, Bush said two of the hijackers who helped fly a jet into the Pentagon — Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar — had communicated with suspected Al Qaeda members overseas while they were living in the U.S.

...

But some current and former high-ranking U.S. counter-terrorism officials say that the still-classified details of the case undermine the president's rationale for the recently disclosed domestic spying program.

Indeed, a 2002 inquiry into the case by the House and Senate intelligence committees blamed interagency communication breakdowns — not shortcomings of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or any other intelligence-gathering guidelines.

The current and former counter-terrorism officials, who requested anonymity, said there were repeated phone communications between a safe house in Yemen and the San Diego apartment rented by Alhazmi and Almihdhar. The Yemen site already had been linked directly to the Al Qaeda bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998 and to the 2000 bombing of the U.S. destroyer Cole in Yemen, several current and former U.S. counter-terrorism officials familiar with the case said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-targets21dec21,1,32492.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&vote21053367=1

oops! :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. 74.6% say Bush violated our rights
Thanks for posting the article as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Poll done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Up a tenth to 74.7 no
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. 25/75
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Done
Poll
Was President Bush within his rights to authorize domestic spying without court approval?
24.8%
Yes. This is a crucial tool in the fight against terrorism.
(814 responses)
75.2%
No. The president's order violates Americans' rights.
(2470 responses)
3284 total responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. voted and now it's 75.5 to 24.5
Thank the Goddess that we aren't brain dead after all. Okay, I'll bet those who voted for are undereducated, republican and very religious. (which follows that they are mentally constipated and will do whatever they are told.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Done.

Was President Bush within his rights to authorize domestic spying without court approval?

24.0%
Yes. This is a crucial tool in the fight against terrorism.
(823 responses)


76.0%
No. The president's order violates Americans' rights.
(2611 responses)

3434 total responses




Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. 77.2%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC