Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chimp's speech: he wanted to crow about Iraqi elections tomorrow BUT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:30 PM
Original message
Chimp's speech: he wanted to crow about Iraqi elections tomorrow BUT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/politics/18bush.html


Spy-gate has cast a big shadow over his scheduled self-congratulatory happy talk... ha ha ha.



His statement came just a day before he was scheduled to make a rare Oval Office address to the nation, at 9 p.m. Eastern time on Sunday, celebrating the Iraqi elections and describing what his press secretary on Saturday called the "path forward."

<snip>

But the revelation of the domestic spying program, which the administration temporarily suspended last year because of concerns about
its legality, came in a leak. Mr. Bush said the information had been "improperly provided to news organizations."

<snip>

But as the clamor over the revelation rose and Vice President Dick Cheney and Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff, went to Capitol Hill on Friday to answer charges that the program was an illegal assumption of presidential powers, even in a time of war, Mr. Bush and his senior aides decided to abandon that approach.

<snip>

Senator Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has said he would conduct hearings on why Mr. Bush took the action.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't it Arlen Specter who came up with the....
"single bullet theory?" Could be another whitewash in the making.:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I believe they have truly pissed off the Senate this time.
The Old Guard is outraged that they were bypassed.

Pay no attention to the drool dribbling out of the mouths of clowns like Cornyn and the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. the very same.
very scary guy. just doesn't look it, sorta like Bush Sr.

Makes them all the more dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. how can that vile old monkey still be fukking around?
mygod, poor jfk has been gone 40 plus years, and this demonic elf is still raping and murdering :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Beats the hell out of me.
Anybody can go down to the library and check out various books on how Specter stood in the window of the Book Depository and "directed" the investigation of the supposed fatal shot. He and Gerald Ford "adjusted" the facts so blatantly . . .

Yet they still walk among us. An' ole Arlen's still calling the shots (pun intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Bank on it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't 9PM after bu$h's bed time?
Maybe they will have him in his pajamas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. that Fucker had better not pre-empt "Desperate Housewives"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Leads to an interesting question
May the President give consent to Unconstitutional acts without consultation and control of Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. You make a great point here
He was planning a big "Mission Accomplished" speech. Instead, he has to defend himself.

That's surely not what he had in his tiny mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Or is it?
Could it be that he cut a deal with NYT to release the information at a time when the scandal could be absorbed by something else?

In his PBS interview yesterday, he literally said that the spying scandal is not the top story -- it's the Iraqi election. How did he learn to say that so fast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm sure he knew it was coming by then
You may be right, but he gets a lot of coaching.

No question, either way he's on the defensive big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC