Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plutonian Over Miami (Moon Over Miami)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:06 PM
Original message
Plutonian Over Miami (Moon Over Miami)

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/Opinion/Editorials/03OpOPN45120405.htm


Making too little of plutonium load

NASA is again rolling dice with the lives of the people of Florida.

The space agency intends to launch an Atlas rocket carrying a space probe with 24 pounds of plutonium fuel in January. Once it separates from the rocket, the probe, on what NASA calls its New Horizons mission, would move on through space powered by conventional chemical fuel. The plutonium is contained in a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, or RTG, that is to provide on-board electricity for the probe's instruments -- a mere 180 watts when it gets to its destination of Pluto.

But if the Atlas rocket with the space probe and RTG it is to loft undergoes a catastrophic accident at launch, some of that plutonium could be dispersed -- affecting life in Florida.

NASA calculates the chances of a successful mission at 94 percent. As to the release of plutonium -- long-considered the most deadly radioactive substance known -- NASA puts the odds at 1-in-300. These figures are contained -- and repeated -- in NASA's "Final Environmental Impact Statement for the New Horizons Mission." If people knew they had a 1-in-300 chance of winning the Florida lottery, there would be lines miles long at every store selling lottery tickets from Daytona Beach to Key West.
-snip-
------------------------------


NASA isn't the NASA it used to be

since the criminal bushgang invaded and took over NASA it has become as deadly as the bushgang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I prefer "Moons Over My-Hammy," but Denny's doesn't make it anymore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That sounds disgusting. I mean, really lewd, for some reason!
Edited on Wed Dec-07-05 01:24 PM by amitten
Moons over my HAMMY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That may be why they discontinued it. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing new here
They've been launching Plutonium for years.

Multiple launches during Clinton's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes
This is absolutely nothing new. They've been doing it for decades. As far as I know, anything that goes to the outer solar system has a nuclear reactor of one kind or another onboard. Once you're too far from the sun for solar power, there really aren't any options other than nuclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. cool
I've been hoping for a long time that NASA would send a probe to Pluto.

Here's the mission website: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/

Looks like the plan is for the probe to launch in January, rendez-vous with Jupiter in 2007, and reach the Pluto system in 2015. If all goes well, this'll be really exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. you do relize that beyond the mars orbit, there is pretty much no
other way to power space craft than with RTG? Its a risk most of us are willing to take. Also, the canister this thing is in is hard as hell, it was tested by a drop from a plane at 35,000 feet, a train running over it, and several other tests that would flatten most other stuff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC