Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about the Plame investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
abcdan Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 12:36 PM
Original message
Question about the Plame investigation
One thing I don't get about the whole handing over documents thing, and maybe someone can shed some light on this - if someone in the White House has documents that would implement themselves, wouldn't they just not hand them over to the justice department? It's like gathering up all of the suspects to a murder case and saying, "If you have any clothes that may have gun fire residue on them, please hand them over to us for inspection. Thank you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Whitehouse Council has said they will review all documents BEFORE
handing them over to investigaters. This is kind of like the Little girl murder (what was her name)Ramsey I think, Jon Benet Ramsey. Remember the parents didn't have to be interviewed by police because of all their money and fame. This reminds me of that case and it was never solved either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's a matter of weighing the risks
I agree the obvious thing to do would be just to withold some documents, but there must be the risk that that could be found out, and that could make the scandal worse, like the Watergate coverup was worse than the original crime.

I'm sure they're working very hard right now trying to do exactly what you're saying, trying to see what they can get away with. And I'm sure they'll be able to get away with much more against Ashcroft than against a special counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They've had TIme To Order In a Bunch of New Heavy-duty Shredders
can't have them breaking down under the load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC