In the North Carolina Senate race, Erskine Bowles (D) "has a double-digit lead" over Rep. Richard Burr (R) "in a hypothetical Senate matchup, according to an independent poll taken last month for a nonpartisan North Carolina business group," Roll Call reports.
http://politicalwire.com/--------------
just another anti-edwards talking point debunked. First supporters of other candidates(and the political media) bashed him for "leaving the NC dem party in a stalemate", and for "not making a decision already", then when he did make a decision he "screwed the dems senate chances" and what not.
Edwards has always been the candidate with the best chance of ushering in a democratic senate in 04, and congress by 06 or 08. Certain other top-tier potential presidential primary nominees would almost certainly be avoided by dem candidates around the country for campaigning and overall association.
Edwards would be embraced, the NC seat would almost certainly be protected with an Edwards nomination. Georgia and South Carolina, where Edwards has personally lived during his youth, are the 2 least safe seats for democrats, and I'm hardpressed to think of an argument why any other nominee would have a stronger case that he could hold them on his(or her) coattails, better than Edwards could.
Now if only i could stop the "he'd make a great vp" babble