Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards i just rewatched hardball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:09 PM
Original message
Edwards i just rewatched hardball
Edited on Fri Oct-17-03 07:10 PM by bearfartinthewoods
i am so impressed with how REAL he is. i rewatched partially because of a conversation with an indie couple. the were GUSHING, and i mean that. about his personality. they said he mwas a little hard on bush and i bit my lip because i wanted to hear about Edwards. they liked him, i think, mostly for his style and his populism. the man ended with the phrase 'really good guy'....wow.

they're right. he has a great lugh and there doesn't appear to be a phony bone in his body. why he isn't catching fire is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dean/Edwards would be the "sexiest" Dem ticket ever - eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, and that DOES matter!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. He isn't catching on becaue the media has been ignoring him.
Edited on Fri Oct-17-03 07:12 PM by AP
If I could control the media in America for one week I could get this guy 90% approval ratings and I could get everyone else to drop out of the race out of frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think there is a damn good chance Edwards will be the next president n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. If he can get the nomination, he will be.
I think getting the nomination will be far harder for him. Again, I suspect he is pegged for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. agreed-- n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. he doesnt strike anybody as
a badass mutha trucka, like say a Dean or a Clarke would. Sure he's nice, but the Dems dont want a Populist, they want somebody who's going to go for the jugular. Perhaps he's capable of being more critical of Bush, but it seems like he's holding back for some reason.. . oh, because he's a Populist and his campaign is straight outta Mayberry or some shit, "oh golly Gee I am a stonemason's son, dont Bush just teeyick you off?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. When has the guy going for the jugular EVER won, R or D?
Goldwater? Even GWB was too nasty for people's taste when he ran against Reagan. They had to spend 8 years turning him into a nice guy (anybody remember when George and Babs were interviewed in bed in their jammies? UGGHHHH!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. did you watch him on ball?
hardtweety was aghast at the stuff he laid on bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. And Tweety could refute none of it...
He asked Edwards "Do you really mean that?" Edwars replied in the affiramtive and Tweety moved on. I think Tweety knew he couldn't lay a glove on Edwards.

Must be hard when the interviewee is smarter, more eloquent, and more charming than you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. i guess populism was a poor choice
if your definition is correct.

despite the accent, he doesn't come of 'mayberryish'

it's more that, and i hate to repeat myself. but his realness...down to earth but not hickish.

totally confident yet totally unpretenious, when he talked about the excitement of planning to buy a home it struck a cord with the indies i referred to, he radiates 'i care' without seeming.....i'm stuck for a word again...oh well...it will come to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Oh Edwards goes for the jugular all right
He's just an artist at it (i.e. quick, effective, and with a smile on his face.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clark/Edwards 04'

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TennesseeWalker Donating Member (925 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Megadittoes!
...or Megadoses....but I agree. Clark/Edwards is the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's talking an attractive campaign reform concept, right?
If I recall correctly he mentioned it in the OLeily interview:

Public financing of campaigns + Free TV.

We need something to get us out of the gawdawful money race!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's something that personally connects with Edwards
He's the only candidate that doesn't seem completely scripted and on guard. Maybe because he has the least to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. He definitely has a "spark" - kle! - eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Maybe he is highly intelligent and can think on his feet like Clinton
and he isn't beligerent like another certain candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Comment and question
You'll get no argument from me about Edward's personality. He's personable and likable.

My question is: Waht does he now say about Iraq? The last time I saw him (one of the Sunday talk shows) he would go no farther than "It's a good thing Saddam is gone." I found that disappointing and am hoping he's going further out on the limb now, as in asserting the case for war was based on lies or something like that.

Was it discussed?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Well, he and Kerry just stopped payment on that "blank check"
that Congress wrote Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. but DUers mean "blank check" in not just monetary terms
In fairness to Kerry's supposed sudden "conversion" to the anti-war movement, he is just following up consistent with his IWR vote by pointing out that 'til now Bush had his trust to act responsibly (as in not attacking Iraq unilaterally) as per his statement yesterday:

"We need to stand up to this president. They’ve already proven they can’t be trusted, they’ve already proven that they’re willing to mislead..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. He thinks doing what Bush did
was a good thing. He was for toppling Saddam and hasn't changed his position (with or without UN approval). He may be trying to separate his support for the action and Bush's approach in alienating other countries. A kind of have your cake and eat it too position given that the war is unpopular with many activists in the party but at the time of the vote, was popular with Americans. I'm from N.C., but supporting Clark. I think at any other time, I might would consider him, but not given the current climate in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Serious, quick, great ideas, and likeable
That's what I want in my party's nominee.

He has been gaining everywhere so the question is not whether he gets enough votes, its whether he has enough time.
Check him out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Edward's working class roots are showing! Go guy!
I love it. Edwards is waging class war! Snapping at the heels of the rich who are shifting the burdens on working and middle class.

Very articulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC