Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fossil "Footprints" Stir Debate About Earliest Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:02 AM
Original message
Fossil "Footprints" Stir Debate About Earliest Americans
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/12/1201_051201_footprints.html

Fossil "Footprints" Stir Debate About Earliest Americans

Brian Handwerk
for National Geographic News

December 1, 2005

In July a team of English researchers reported the discovery of human footprints in Mexico that appeared to be 30,000 years older than when most scientists believe humans arrived in the Americas.

Researchers commonly accept that humans came to the Americas some 11,500 years ago. But new dating of the Mexican find suggests that the features are in fact 1.3 million years old. If the new dates are correct, the footprints could be among the most incredible hominid traces ever discovered—or, more likely, not footprints at all.

"One-point-three million years is a lot older than I expected," said Paul Renne, director of the Berkeley Geochronology Center at University of California, Berkeley. "I repeated the experiment nine times using different samples, usually single chunks of this basaltic rock, and they all gave the same unambiguous results."

Silvia Gonzalez, a geoarchaeologist at England's Liverpool John Moores University, and a team of colleagues first discovered the features in 2003. The researchers found them embedded in basaltic lava on the floor of an abandoned quarry near Puebla in central Mexico. The team identified the indentations as footprints and dated them at 40,000 years old.

But if Renne's new dates are correct, the prints may be those of an incredibly ancient hominid, made well over a million years before the Americas are believed to have been inhabited.

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. A typo in the article ...30,000 should be 1.300.000 years.
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 02:05 AM by seriousstan
Am I reading that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Either that or 30,000+11,500=1,300,000
Must be the new math...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. We already know 11,500 is completely wrong.
The currently accepted date may well be around 30,000 years ago.

We've found ashpits around that age in Peru, I think.

11,500 is the exploded land bridge bunk. It bizarrely believed that ancient homo sapiens couldn't build a boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julianer Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep
Pre-Clovis humans were definitely in North America. I've seen a prog (details blurry) called 'Stone Age Colombus' suggesting that the earliest known humans in North America came from...gulp...France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes -- i've read that as well ---
amusing, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "It bizarrely believed that ancient homo sapiens couldn't build a boat."..
...yet somehow managed to get to Australia. Yep, they could never rationalize that one.

The Aleutians make great stepping stones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. How is this possible?
We all know the earth is only 6000 years old.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC