Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

600 lbs. of Plutonium may be missing from Los Alamos (hmm)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:02 AM
Original message
600 lbs. of Plutonium may be missing from Los Alamos (hmm)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/30/BAGGQFVT7J1.DTL
LOS ALAMOS
Plutonium could be missing from lab
600-plus pounds unaccounted for, activist group say..


Enough plutonium to make dozens of nuclear bombs hasn't been accounted for at the UC-run Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and may be missing, an activist group says in a new report.

There is no evidence that the weapons-grade plutonium has been stolen or diverted for illegal purposes, the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research said. However, the amount of unaccounted-for plutonium -- more than 600 pounds, and possibly several times that -- is so great that it raises "a vast security issue," the group said in a report to be made public today.


Which major American City gets nuked in 06'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shit.
Wonder how that went missing?:banghead: Rat bastards!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. shit, my bad...it was me....
i got 600lbs of the stuff right in my garage, i stole it...sorry, i will return it tomorrow, for sure...:) just kidding...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. and they just now noticed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's being planted in Iraq



And will be "discovered" as WMD's around election time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is not the first problem with stuff disappearing from
Los Alamos. I remember something else disappearing last year.

Mmmm, maybe they should look in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Plenty of whistles blowing, who's listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is sooo bad Cheney is a mad man!!!
:nuke: I agree and it makes so much sense the destruction of Brewster & Jennings!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is most likely an accounting matter...
... and little more. Los Alamos has lots of material in the form of small turnings in machining oil stored all over the site over the past sixty years that hasn't been reprocessed because it's mixed waste. Area G, which is up on a high mesa behind the lab, is loaded with barrels of the stuff.

The same charges were made of Rocky Flats years ago, and then it was discovered that there were likely several hundred pounds of plutonium dust distributed in the air ducts in and around the production facilities and that a significant amount of additional dust had been taken off-site by winds. It was effectively spread out over thousands of acres.

This is a very small amount compared to what was produced over the years. By 1960, the US had something like 78,000 nuclear weapons in the inventory. Even a small manufacturing loss by that time would have been thousands of pounds.

Try not to fret. They should definitely make a better effort to pin down the nature of the discrepancy, but it shouldn't be a cause for immediate alarm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm Sure Jeff Gerth And The NYT Will Be On The Case
And the Republican leadership will be all over the president for selling us out to the Chi-coms :eyes: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, but only if...
... he can also go after Wen Ho Lee again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Although this is worrisome news,
Does this mean that Bush will make a video of himself looking for the plutonium in the Oval Office and show it at the next Gridiron Dinner?

"No, none here."

Seriously though, it seems as though an immediate audit needs to be done, if these allegations have any credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Everybody's got one, I want mine.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Prophecy moment
"It's all Bill Clinton's Fault!"

I had a full-blown thing to write, but the first line just gags me, because I expect it to be declared on wingnut radio in the next day or so. Damn, but I loathe the wingnuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Doc needed it to generate sufficient jigawatts of power to get back
to the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crayson Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Nah... he upgraded his reactor and uses bio fuel now!
^_^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. That's enought for like 20 bombs I think
depending on how big. But come on...Why is it that something huge disappears from this place every month? I don't buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. aw jeez!
Boy I HOPE it's a clerical error...That's a pretty big motza ball hanging out there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC