Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich LTTE and Huffington Post blog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 10:18 PM
Original message
Kucinich LTTE and Huffington Post blog



Rep. Dennis Kucinich


11.26.2005

To the Publisher of the LA Times

(24 comments )

Jeffrey M. Johnson
Publisher
Los Angeles Times
202 West First Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Dear Mr. Johnson:

We, as Members of Congress, object to the dismissal of Robert Scheer, a 32-year veteran of the LA Times with a long history of excellence in reporting and op ed pieces. For example, over the last 10 years:


*Scheer, in 1995, was a leading critic of the Gingrich plan to cut social spending to record low levels and he wrote adamantly about the need to save affirmative action.


*In 1996, Scheer criticized welfare reform for its effect on the poor as soon as the economy turns south.


*Scheer wrote in 1999 in defense of Wen Ho Lee, the nuclear weapons scientist accused by many of selling nuclear secrets, despite the lack of evidence.


*In 200, Scheer preidcted the Bush/Cheney ticket's close ties to the oil industry would ensure consumers would "feel the sting from the exhorbitant price of gas."


*In 2001, Scheer identified the dangerous precedent of the Patriot Act. He forecast the attack on our basic liberties.


*In 2003, Scheer was already making a strong case for the U.S. getting out of Iraq.


*Scheer's final column highlighted military intelligence documents that suggested Iraqi intelligence was manipulated, as opposed to simply bad intelligence.

On Nov. 11th, the LA Times reported this dismissal along with other staff cuts. According to the article, a conservative contributing editor to the National Review has been hired to write for the op-ed pages. In effect the LA Times has hired a Bush Administration cheerleader to replace a leading critic of the Administration.

Your readers, and the nation, deserve better. We hope that you will reconsider your dismissal of Robert Scheer.


Sincerely,

Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
Diane Watson (D-CA)
Barbara Lee (D-CA)
Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)
John Tierney (D-MA)
Neil Abercrombie (D-HI)
Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)
Richard Neal (D-MA)
Michael Honda (D-CA)
Raul Grijalva (D-AZ)
Patrick Kennedy (D-RI)
Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA)
Bob Filner (D-CA)
Maurice Hinchey (D-NY)
Marcy Kaptur (D-OH)
Gwen Moore (D-WI)
John Lewis (D-GA)
George Miller (D-CA)
Bill Clay (D-MO)
Donald Payne (D-NJ)
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
Hilda Solis (D-CA)
Sam Farr (D-CA)
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)


Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-dennis-kucinich/to-the-publisher-of-the-_b_11271.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another post on HP from Jeff Jarvis

There are No Official Readers

(18 comments )
At The Huffington Post, Rep. Dennis Kucinich publishes a letter he and 23 more members of Congress sent to the publisher of the LA Times objecting to the dismissal of columnist Robert Sheer. If they were just readers writing to a paper complaining about something the paper had done, fine. Wonderful, in fact.

The more feedback, the better.

But they don't write as readers. Their letter begins: "We, as Members of Congress, object to the dismissal..."

What does being a Member of Congress (capitalized) have to do with this? Is this an effort to intimidate the press from an official position? Remember, people, we don't do that here. In fact, you are sworn to protect against just that.

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-jarvis/there-are-no-official-rea_b_11272.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why not object as congressional representatives?
It's not as if they had authored any laws making it illegal to fire commentators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC