Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sex, Lies And Statistics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:43 PM
Original message
Sex, Lies And Statistics
Sex, Lies And Statistics
Seth Lubove, 11.23.05, 3:00 PM ET

LOS ANGELES - When Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) introduced the Internet Safety & Child Protection Act in July, aiming to slap a 25% excise tax on online purchases of porn, she cited a startling statistic: Children in the U.S. now typically get their first exposure to porn at age 11. It got picked up in several press reports. "The average age at which a child first views Internet porn is 11," pronounced a Denver Post editorial. "The average age a child first views Internet pornography is 11, and those kids don't look away," intoned Matt Lauer on General Electric-owned NBC's Today show.

"The Internet has changed the whole dynamic of porn," declares Tim Wildmon, president of the fundamentalist American Family Association founded by his father, Donald Wildmon, in Tupelo, Miss. "The average age of the introduction to pornography is now 11 years old."

Just one problem: The assertion is untrue, unsupported and likely of dubious origin, none of which has stopped porn's opponents from using it. Sen. Lincoln lifted the factoid from a report issued in July by Third Way, a new Washington think tank that helps Democrats grab on to red-state issues. A press release accompanying the report, by Third Way staffer Sean Barney, proclaimed, "While it is as difficult as ever for a teenager to walk into a store and buy a pornographic magazine, it is as easy as 'point-and-click' for an 11-year-old child to view streaming pornographic video online."

Where did Third Way get that notion? From a May 12 story in the New York Times-owned (nyse: NYT - news - people ) Boston Globe headlined "The Secret Life of Boys," which cites an outfit called Family Safe Media. The small firm in Provo, Utah, is in the business of scaring parents into buying software to protect their kids from Internet smut. Jared Martin, who owns Family Safe Media, says he got his porn statistics from Internet Filter Review, a Web site that recommends content-blocking software. It is run by tech entrepreneur Jerry Ropelato of Huntsville, Utah, who pens antiporn screeds, such as "Tricks Pornographers Play," and publishes curious and uncredited stats (for example, "17% of all women struggle with pornography addiction").

more http://www.forbes.com/services/2005/11/22/internet-pornography-children-cz_sl_1123internet.html?partner=rss

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why am I not surprised people are going bonkers over this?
SEX! AHHHHHHHHH!! NOOOOO!!! ANYTHING BUT!!!!

:sarcasm:

Repugs need to grow up and stop having orgasms whenever people mention porn. They get WAY too overexcited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. But it's not only the GOP that's using these bogus stats. When the
electioneering starts, look to our party to start demonizing the devil PORN, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the average age for introduction to pornography has always been
young (depending on your definition of pornography).

I stumbled upon some amateur mags when I was 12 or so, at a house where I was babysitting. (They were not-very-well hidden in the linen closet, and I was looking for towels or toilet paper or some such.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. OMG---Is your avatar an African Grey parrot?
Adorable! I have one--a Congo!

:D :D :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Meyer's Parrot -- and the tiny green speck is a parrotlet.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Damn! So close! (Not Really)
Oh well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't doubt that it is young
but making up statistics to advance your political agenda, which is more about trying to punish adults than protect children, is deplorable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bammertheblue Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's pretty much
Edited on Sat Nov-26-05 01:03 PM by bammertheblue
exactly how I found my first Playboys- I was babysitting and needed more TP and they were in the bathroom, under the sink. Really, who hides their porn in the cabinet under the sink?
I was a little older, probably 16, and I neither became addicted to porn, or really thought it was all that dirty- in a moral sense.

Gotta love it when people just make things up to advance their goals. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wow I think we have a trend here
I first saw porn when I was babysitting.

TIME TO BAN BABYSITTING!:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. On a similar path, there was a story about Sen. Feinstein recently
She didn't want to establish a Senate website because she told the Minority Leader that there was nothing on the internet but porn! She is registered as a Democrat and so am I, but I sure as hell didn't vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pfft. That's ridiculous.
"Nothing but porn."

Pfft.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Would that make DU political porn? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. probably...
I do feel pleasure when I'm here. Does that make me a sinner? :9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Why are you at DU?
when porn is your priority?

:shrug:

No, really-- please tell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I can answer that
Because people that work in adult entertainment vote, pay taxes and raise families like everyone else. People in our profession constantly face assaults on our free speech and privacy rights. We are the canaries in your coal mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. The old politician two-step
re:puke: style. Tell your RWW friend some lie, they repeat the lie to their RWW friends who are then used as 'sources' to 'confirm' the lie, then call a M$M shill to broadcast the new 'truth'.
And the sheeple eat it up as fast as they can manufacture it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Make a law prohibiting something that never happens like flag-burning.
Then shout from every media outlet about how well your law is working.

The ole politician's two-step -- you got it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. 17% of all women struggle with pornography addiction?!
I can volunteer to help with that struggle. Is it too high on the shelf? Problems with the VCR or DVD? Need a ride to the adult video store? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. LOL!
Maybe I need a courtesy van.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. People are predisposed to uncritically accept that which supports
their world view. Meanwhile, things opposing one's worldview need to be supported by many witnesses or much evidence from those sharing one's worldview.

It just takes one report for a 'fact' to become fact, for one token instance to be generalized to the entire phenomenon.

And they say our schools teach critical thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Porn "addiction" is such bullshit anyway.
People get addicted heroin or nicotine. Their bodies change in such a manner that they not only accomodate the chemical, but they suffer physical side effects in that chemical's absence. That doesn't fucking happen with porn.

People who are "addicted" to porn are most often dodging a legal charge in court. The closest thing to real porn "addiction" would be simple obsessive-compulsive disorder with porn as the focus, and it can be treated with the same therapy and medication.

I guess in circles where people are afraid of their own erections, attacking porn continues to be the best way for them to reconcile the empirical data contradicting the sociopathic dogma they espouse, by externalizing all responsibility for their actions (and, more specifically, their bodies' reactions to stimuli).

I guess I'm not really surprised that they are willing to make shit up to support their beliefs; they do it with everything else. I was willing to live and let live until they started fucking with my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Now, they're all on my shit list, and I'm not getting happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well said
And the whole "addiction" thing gets on my nerves too - whether it's food, porn or shoes.

Using the term addiction for compulsive behavior really cheapens the struggle of all recovering addicts/alcoholics.

Besides, in my 3 years running this store, I've never encountered anyone who I could say was "addicted" to porn - or even that compulsive about it.

And yes, I have regular customers. But I'm sure the blockbuster down the road does too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I was going to post that I agree, but I have to go surf some porn.
I just can't help myself....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC