Malkin draws SIXTY to speech: "Media is against Bush administration"

[Bluebear]

:rofl:
...She said The New York Times and The Washington Post carry a double standard and that they are “covering up a lot of atrocities done by Democrats.”

She used Eleanor Clift of Newsweek and political cartoonists as specific examples of the media against the Bush administration.....

Malkin concluded her presentation with a question for the audience. “If we don’t question (liberal's) patriotism, who will?” she said.

The crowd of about 60 people would have been larger, however, it dwindled significantly because Malkin arrived over an hour late due to weather delays at the airport. “It was the day from hell,” she said after some technology problems prolonged the speech further.

http://www.westernherald.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/11/21/43811d7d2fd61

[wakeme2008]

1. Question is WHAT DID IT COST

these 60 College Repugs to get her????????????????

[Starbucks Anarchist]

3. $50 and their sense of shame.

[CatWoman]

10. The article says liberals made up a large part of the audience

[TallahasseeGrannie]

2. That is truly an unflattering picture!

I disagree with her most of the time, but I have always thought she is a very attractive woman. She looks like a charicature here!

That said, I'd like to hear about those Democratic atrocities. Maybe Pvt. England was a Dem?

[SmokingJacket]

8. Beautiful people become ugly when they're mean.

She's a nasty, bitter person. Whatever good looks God gave her are being fast corrupted by her ugly nature. It's a sad thing.

[TallahasseeGrannie]

17. Yes, hate and intolerance is not attractive.

[TheCowsCameHome]

50. She got whipped on both counts.

[walldude]

Maybe she was talking about those horrible liberals

who said this about her:

His question was prompted by vicious anonymous bloggers who portray me as a greedy Asian whore/dupe/brainwashing victim who simply parrots what my white slavemasters program into my empty little head. These critics have stepped up attacks on my husband Jesse as a fanatical right-wing puppeteer orchestrating all I do and say.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003955.htm

Funny thing is, she has some links in the article. None of which point to a single "anonymous blogger" who said any such thing. All the links in the article point to other articles on her site, and those articles have links which point to.. you guessed it, more articles on her site. She's demented, really.

[TallahasseeGrannie]

25. Warm and fuzzy, no?

[Eric J in MN]

44. That long post by Michelle Malkin also lacks a clear denial,

saying that none of the posts at her blog "by Michelle Malkin" were by her husband.

I discuss that at SpeakSpeak:
http://www.speakspeak.org/speak-blog/2005/11/24/a-simple-question-for-michelle-malkin

[Eric J in MN]

37. I heard that Lyndie England drove to her trial in a car with

a Bush bumpersticker. I don't know whose car it was.

[Mr_Spock]

4. She is terminally creepy!

I wonder if there is ever a chance at redemption for such people?

Is she ever lost...

[rusty charly]

5. "due to weather delays at the airport"

... sounds like God didn't want her to make it.

[seabeyond]

6. she cussed. if i dont challenge her christianity then who will? n/t

[ComerPerro]

36. LOL

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

7. Wow! A sellout crowd!

According to the article, half of 'em were (unpatriotic) liberals. Weather delays at the airport caused the problem, she said. We could offer a big thankyou to whichever airline made her late, or maybe to the Goddess for messing up the weather, but would she really have drawn a bigger crowd if it weren't for that? Jeepers, she's awful. Annthrax Coulter wannabe.

[Gormy Cuss]

9. If we don't question conservative's patriotism, who will?

Is she really so obtuse that she thinks political cartoonists shouldn't make negative comments about administrations? Honestly.

[Eric J in MN]

46. Good catch. (nt)

nt

[FreedomAngel82]

58. They happily question and accuse ours!

So I say I should do the same thing!

[shance]

11. There is no left wing media. The media is run primarily by the CIA.

Namely the Washington Post and the New York Times.

And of course spewing individuals like Michelle Malkin who do their bidding and continue to try and desperately perpetuate the lie that the media is anything other than a Right winged group of men who are in large part connected with intelligence.

[Media_Lies_Daily]

30. Your information is a little outdated....

...since major corporations began buying large chunks of the media about twenty years ago to have the news reported as they see fit.

Those major corporations are very conservative politically with interests in finding new markets and cheap labor, wherever they may be. The industrial, intelligence, military, and diplomatic arms of the U. S. government do the bidding of these major corporations by protecting current markets and attempting to take over new markets by any means necessary.

Yes, Operation Mockingbird was begun by the CIA in 1948 to infiltrate the media at all levels to influence and guide reporting to the American people, as well as manipulate public opinion. Over time, other inteligence organizations created their own versions of Operation Mockingbird, like ONI (Bob Woodward), each with their own agenda and worldview.

When the major corporations began buying up the media, the media began shaping public opinion in support of corporatist goals for a global economy. That effort has culminated in what we're experiencing today. Anything eating into the profits of those major corporations, like healthcare, is being eliminated as quickly as possible.

The NeoCon Junta is the public persona of the rightwing fascist corporate elite, and they are attempting to use the U. S. military and intelligence arms to achieve total control of OPEC oil. If you look closely at some of the trouble spots around the globe, you will find the worst spots concentrated around the geographic locations of the various OPEC member-states.

As much as so many DUers hate the thought, some portions of the CIA are actively engaged in destabilizing the NeoCon Junta. As proof, I ask the doubters to ask themselves where they believe all of the leaks have originated.

I also ask them to consider which agency of the U. S. government would be most likely to keep copies of the proceedings of all so-called secret meetings, phonecalls, emails, faxes, and any other correspondence of the NeoCon Junta.

Which agency has taken the most damage over the last five years from the NeoCon Junta? Which agency has been blamed for the so-called "bad" intelligence on WMDs? Which agency has been demoted from a cabinet-level position by the NeoCon Junta? Which agency is in the most danger of being broken into pieces to be parceled out to any number of other organizations?

And finally, which agency has the most reason to seek revenge from the NeoCon Junta?

[FreedomAngel82]

60. Yep

And also don't forget that it's in the corporations best intrest's to side with Bush since they are making a lot more money. They'll never be against republicans since they cater to them always.

[Straight Shooter]

12. "It was the day from hell."

What, did she just come back from Iraq? She doesn't know hell.

[NJCher]

13. Margaret Cho on Michelle Malkin

She said Koreans had come a long way and the way should could tell that is that they had their very own right wing loony: Michelle.




Cher

[Starbucks Anarchist]

15. Isn't Malkin of Filipino descent?

Not that it matters. Her soul is ugly no matter where she's from.

[JI7]

21. maybe she said or meant asians

[Starbucks Anarchist]

22. True.

[dogfacedboy]

14. She sure is ugly, even for a right wing whore.

Must be the STD's working on her(it?).

[TallahasseeGrannie]

18. Wow. You are right, you know?

it all comes down to SEX. She MUST BE A SLUT with AIDS, I'll bet!

[dogfacedboy]

20. My opinion has nothing to do with her(its?) gender.

All right wing hate speakers/supporters/voters are diseased whores, as far as I'm concerned. Malkin is just uglier than most.

[TallahasseeGrannie]

23. Yes indeed, nothing to do with gender.

A whore is a whore is a whore. Male or female. It all comes down to sex. All of it.

[Skittles]

26. I don't think so

I call 'em corporate whores and media whores and republican whores but I see it as having nothing to do with sex - they just sell their souls

[TallahasseeGrannie]

27. We need a good "soulwhore" word

because that's a great concept.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

28. I like "soulwhore."

Or maybe "soulslut."

[Media_Lies_Daily]

31. That implies that one has a soul in the first place. She has none.

[Olney Blue]

53. How about "s'mwhore"?

Could represent several things:

smear/whore
smut/whore
Hey, that's "some whore"
slant media whore


}(

[tinfoilinfor2005]

16. This is my Alma Mater!

The article didn't mention the political persuasion of the attendees, but back in "my day" most radical political speakers were attended by a cynical crowd of onlookers who mostly came to snicker at them. Of course that was in the sixties. :hippie:

On edit, it appears that the article does mention that there were liberals there to offer their opinions as well. So I guess not that much has changed over the years. ;-)

[NoPasaran]

19. "Liberals Gone Wild"!

I think I'll wait for the DVD.

[kevinbgoode]

24. And when are we going to question Ms. Malkin's patriotism?

After all, falsehoods and hate are certainly not American qualities or ideals. Perhaps we should rage about their own lack of "patriotism".

[H2O Man]

29. I feel sorry for her.

Her mind has been twisted by hatred and her sense of reason distorted by fear. It would seem that questioning her patriotism is not particularly important, because she has answered all questions about her lack of intelluctual curiosity. Attracting a "crowd" of 60 speaks loudly.

[Marr]

32. 'If we don't make juvenile attacks, who will?'

'If we don't lie, who will?'

'If we don't rape and murder, who will?'

How about nobody, Michelle?

What the hell kind of argument is that? Whatever- it's just the sort of thing I've come to expect from the hypcritical "values" crowd.

[H2O Man]

49. Right.

What would be the result of Michelle's not making silly attacks, from her perspective? It's sad, really, to look at the photo in the OP. Michelle is an attractive woman, who has allowed hatred to distort her features. While she is not particularly bright, judging by the way she presents her viwpoint, she does have the potential to be a positive force in our culture. That potential is being wasted.

[Golden Raisin]

33. Malkin is a fan of internment camps!

Did she do her usual charming advocacy for bringing back internment camps (for those she decides are "traitors" or not "patriotic" enough?) When I see human trash like Malkin & Coulter on TV they are living proof of the total, utter decadence & decline of televised news in the United States. Rupert Murdoch should burn in hell for a lot of things, but giving airtime to the likes of Malkin & Coulter should be high on the list.

[TallahasseeGrannie]

34. I have noticed

that many of my Asian friends and colleagues (all rather recent immigrants) have positive things to say about internment camps. None, however, are Japanese. They are Chinese, Korean, and Taiwanese. I think it has something to do with WWII leftover hate and I am assuming that's where Malkin gets hers from. Not excusing her, just trying to place her particular nuttiness historically.

She obviously has a chip on one of those lovely shoulders.

[ovidsen]

43. Makes sense...

The "Imperial Japanese" aren't exactly loved in the rest of Asia. Maybe "Miz" Malkin, who was born in the Phillipines, shares some of this hatred for past deeds.

That's racist, of course. There's no excuse for it. And I still hope she gets run over by a truck. Soon.

[TallahasseeGrannie]

45. I'll go with the truck

but prefer it to be a figurative truck, when her ideology hits her smack in the center of the head and she comes to her senses.

[ovidsen]

47. No problem!

Come to think of it, I want her to live long enough so she can see her hateful ideology destroyed.

[wellst0nev0ter]

48. We Just Nabbed A Filipino Double Agent Working Our Intelligence

Since she is so hard on justifying internment of Japanese people on the flimsiest of evidence, I'm sure she will get behind interning Filipinos on this basis. :sarcasm:

[Eric J in MN]

55. She actually claimed that she does support greater

scrutiny of Phillipinos as a result of that case, in response to liberals who asked her about that.

That makes her consistent, for whatever that's worth.

[dogfacedboy]

62. Well, let's get down to scrutinizing Poochface Malkin.

Maybe that little piece of crap is a spy. Maybe that Filipino spy that was in the WH is one of her relatives.

I say Michelle Malkin is a traitor and a double agent, covering her tracks by posing as a Conservative Tool.

[devilgrrl]

61. I wonder if she was happy hearing of Pat Morita's death?

He was interned during WWII.

What a ghoul she is.

[radfringe]

35. more mud

when they can't defend their positions they throw mud

[EFerrari]

38. And we thought global warming was a problem. n/t

[DemoTex]

39. Day from Hell, Michelle? Been in Cheney's basement?

[Eric J in MN]

40. I bet that when Michael Moore is an hour late for a speech

at a college, there are STILL more than 60 people who stick around to hear it.

[Eric J in MN]

41. "A Simple Question for Michelle Malkin"

http://www.speakspeak.org/speak-blog/2005/11/24/a-simple-question-for-michelle-malkin/

Has your husband ever posted under your name?

At your blog, were any articles presented as "by Michelle Malkin" written entirely by your husband?

Conservative blogger Michelle Malkin avoided the question when askedabout it by Brad Krantz of WZTK-FM, calling the authorship accusation "vile," but not false.

She also avoids the question in a long post at her blog.

She writes about marriage ("I have my hubby's help for a few hours a week.") She writes about Al Franken (he has "research assistants," she irrelevantly notes.) She writes that the question is "racist."

She writes that her husband "helped me with a handful of blog posts out of the estimated 3,000 I've written since June 2004," without explaining whether "helped" means wrote in their entirety, or how many blog-articles constitute a "handful."

But she doesn't write, "None of the posts here with with 'Michelle Malkin' in the byline were written entirely by my husband."

Her evasiveness suggests she's guilty of deceiving the public. If Michelle Malkin lets someone else write entire posts under her name, then she is a fraud.

[Deja Q]

52. How the smeg is having her hubby doing her work 'racist'?

'lazy', obviously... 'moronic', definitely... 'shameful', we'd think... but 'racist'?! Hardly.

[Eric J in MN]

54. There is a theory that JFK didn't write all of "Profiles in Courage."

That theory is racist against whites, according to her logic.

[TheCowsCameHome]

42. A day from Hell? Because you were there made it even worse.

Michelle, just go the F away.

[Deja Q]

51. She was an hour late? My my, she's not a good convervative!

Fire her tardy arsie!

:spank:

[FreedomAngel82]

56. LOL!

The media is against Bush? Oh barf me!

[nadinbrzezinski]

57. So michelle yuo control all but all of a sudden they are

against your god bcause they dare say a bad thing here or there?

Oh my myth making aren't we

[tlsmith1963]

59. Funny...

...I thought it was the other way around. The problem is that the media have given Bush a free ride. Maybe if Malkin paid more attention, she would know this. But judging from that picture, I guess she is too crazy to realize it.:rofl:

Tammy