I presented this information in more detail to the Preventive and Occupational Medicine faculty at the Medical College of Wisconsin when I worked there. The opinion was unanimous: The bullet that killed Kennedy (as well as the one that went through his throat) entered him from the FRONT (in the direction of the grassy knoll). There may have been one or two additional bullets coming from the book depository (in BACK of him), these may or may not have been shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, and Oswald may or may not have been in the book depository at the time. Those issues don’t interest me as much as the bullet that killed JFK.
Most of the evidence I discuss here comes from James Lifton’s “Best Evidence”, one of the most interesting books I’ve ever read.
Evidence at the scene of the crimeMovement of the headThere is no controversy over the fact (since it is preserved on film) that immediately following the shots Kennedy’s head was propelled backwards and slammed against the seat of the car. Those who maintain that all shots came from the back explain the backward movement of the head either as a jet propulsion phenomenon (from brain material coming out of the front of the head) or as due to a neuromuscular reaction. The jet propulsion explanation makes little sense because (among other reasons) all witnesses who observed brain material leaving the head observed it coming from the back, NOT the front of the head. With regard to the neuromuscular reaction explanation, has anyone ever seen a person’s head move forward after being punched in the front of the head?
Eye-witness accounts of the movement of brain materialThree persons have offered eye-witness accounts of the movement of brain material. All three say that the brain material and blood exited the President’s head to the left and rear of the head. Two of them were motorcycle police officers and were actually splattered with the material. One account was obtained from a contemporary newspaper article, one was obtained from Warren Commission testimony, and one was obtained from a book author.
Evidence from the doctors who treated the President at Parkland HospitalThe throat (non-fatal) woundDr. Malcolm Perry made the tracheotomy incision, which was very close to the bullet wound of the throat. Transcripts of a news conference later that day quote Perry as repeatedly characterizing that bullet wound as an entrance wound (meaning it came from the front). Later that weekend, when told by reporters that it had officially been decided that the bullets came from the book depository in back of the President, Perry deduced that the President must have had his head turned (which the Zapruder film shows not to be the case).
Perry completely changed his views on this matter after being “visited” by Secret Service agents. However, the other five medical personnel who saw this wound are on record as having commented on it (one to a newspaper, one in an official medical report, and three in testimony before the Warren Commission), including four physicians and a nurse, all described the throat wound as being an entrance wound.
The fatal head woundNine physicians and a nurse who treated the President at the hospital are quoted (four in Warren Commission testimony, three in their official medical reports, one in a contemporary newspaper account, and Lifton doesn’t provide the source for the other two) as saying that the fatal wound produced a large hole (5-7 centimeters by one account) in the
back right side of the head. The skull at the
back of the head was noted to have “exploded outwards”. All of the physicians characterized this wound as an
exit wound, largely because exit wounds are almost always considerably larger and more destructive than entrance wounds.
Discrepancy between hospital and autopsy findingsThere were numerous and glaring discrepancies between the findings noted by the physicians at Parkland Hospital, compared to the autopsy report, performed at Bethesda Naval Hospital, later on the day of Kennedy’s death. I will mention only the most glaring and important of these here: Instead of a 5-7 centimeter hole in the back right side of the head, as noted at the hospital, the autopsy report indicated a hole more than four times as large and extending around to the front of the head. This is the report that the Warren Commission used to justify its conclusion that Kennedy was shot from behind (though such a large wound wouldn’t much distinguish between a shot from the back versus a shot from the front). Why the huge discrepancy between the autopsy findings versus the hospital findings? Were all the doctors at the hospital who thought they saw an exit wound at the back of the head wrong? Or was the body altered prior to the autopsy?
Secret Service agents make damn sure that they have control of the body prior to the autopsyIf the body was altered prior to the autopsy, that would mean that the conspirators had to have control of the body prior to its arrival at the morgue. How could they manage that?
Getting the body out of DallasThe first step was to make sure that the autopsy was not performed in Texas, as required by state law. In trying to do this, a vicious argument ensued between Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman and Dr. Earl Rose, the Dallas County Medical Examiner. Rose tried to explain that state law required the body to be autopsied in Texas, and that removing the body to Washington would interrupt the chain of evidence. But to no avail.
Here is an account of the “argument” by Aubrey Rike, a Dallas official who was responsible for staying with the casket:
I was scared to death... I was scared all the time I was there... You know, we'd start pushing, and somebody would grab us, and push us back, and pull the casket back. You'd have to see it to believe it... it was the most unorganized, scary type situation I have ever been in in my life. I'm a policeman now, and I've been up against all kinds of stuff.
Arrival of the body at Bethesda Naval Hospital in a DIFFERENT casket Skip forward a bit: Lifton quotes seven persons who noted Kennedy’s body brought into the morgue in a plain gray coffin, very different than the fancy bronze coffin into which Kennedy’s body was placed in Dallas after he was pronounced dead, and which was televised being unloaded from the plane that carried the body from Dallas to Washington. The time that the body arrived at the morgue in the gray coffin was about 6:45 p.m. This was well before the arrival of the bronze casket that supposedly contained Kennedy’s body. But how did Kennedy’s body arrive at the morgue in a different casket than the one into which his body was initially placed, and which was televised being carried off of Air Force One after landing at Andrews Air Force Base in Washington? Consider this:
Hiding the fact that the bronze casket unloaded from Air Force One did NOT contain the bodyThe Army provided a “casket team” of six soldiers who were supposed to obtain the casket for transportation to Bethesda Naval Hospital as it was unloaded off of Air Force One After landing at Andrews AFB. When they tried to obtain the casket (which unbeknownst to them obviously did not contain the body), however, they were pushed out of the way by Secret Service agents, who loaded the casket into an ambulance, which then proceeded by motorcade to Bethesda Naval Hospital. The Army Casket team then proceeded by helicopter to Bethesda to await the body.
Preventing access to the empty casket after arrival at Bethesda Naval The motorcade with the coffin (supposedly containing the body) arrived at Bethesda Naval Hospital at 6:55 p.m. (AFTER the arrival of the plain grey casket which contained the body). But the Army casket team was still not allowed to obtain the casket. There are a number of similar accounts by members of the casket team as to how this happened, but here is a portion of the one that I find the most revealing – a taped interview of Army casket team member Hubert Clark, by David Lifton:
“I think there was a decoy, supposedly to get the people away from the hospital... And we went around to the back I remember driving some distance ... before we actually came in contact with the real casket ..."
Lifton asked if he remembered losing the ambulance. Clark responded:
“I ... we lost it ... We were saying, 'Now where the hell is he?... Why is he speeding?' And we were trying to figure out, 'Well, why is he going so fast? We're going to lose him.' ... and we were saying to each other ... 'What, is he trying to lose us?'..."
Clark said that he thought the ride lasted 10-15 minutes and that the truck got up to speeds of 45 or 50:
”We followed the ambulance until we lost it .. And then it was ... another fifteen minutes trying to find ... to get back to where we started from.”
So what happened with the body?What is clear from all this is that the conspirators were absolutely determined to keep control of the body prior to the autopsy, so that they could make the necessary alterations to make it appear that JFK was shot from the back, not the front of the head. What this means is that the body must have been switched from the fancy bronze coffin into the plain gray coffin while on Air Force One. The empty bronze coffin was televised leaving the plane in the hands of the Secret Service agents (the conspirators). They could not allow the Army Casket team to gain control of the coffin because it would be obvious to anyone who carried it that it was empty. So while the Secret Service agents were maintaining control of the empty bronze coffin, JFK’s body, in the plain gray coffin, was being transported by other conspirators to a place where the necessary alterations could be made. After managing to elude the Army Casket team for about two hours, the Secret Service agents managed to bring the empty bronze coffin into the morgue, where it met up with the body after being unloaded from the gray casket, and was re-loaded into the bronze casket, so that a show could be made of unloading it from the casket which it was supposed to be in.
Control of the autopsyLifton quotes witnesses to the autopsy saying that there were numerous civilians in the autopsy room who seemed to be intimidating the three military physicians who were performing the autopsy, even to the extent of dictating their conclusions. This is corroborated by a book written by James Garrison, “On the Trail of Assassins”, several years after the appearance of Lifton’s book, in which Garrison recounts testimony at a trial. A Dr. Finck, one of the three autopsy physicians, testifies at this trial that he was ordered by civilians at the autopsy on various aspects of how to perform the autopsy.
Control of witnessesThe tight control with which the conspirators managed the whole scenario is exemplified by the fact that all potential witnesses to whatever happened at Bethesda Naval Hospital that day were ordered, upon threat of court martial, not to divulge anything that they saw or heard that day. So frightening was this order that several years later, as the House Select Committee met to re-investigate the JFK assassination (largely because of widespread public dissatisfaction with the Warren Commission Report), an official order from President Carter, rescinding the initial order, was required in order to obtain testimony from people who witnessed the events that occurred at Bethesda Naval Hospital on November 22, 1963.
Parallels between the JFK assassination and the 2004 Presidential election The most important similarities are that both events were right wing coups, with earth shattering implications, masterminded by an extremely powerful group of people, and our government wants us to know as little as possible about these events. The powerful guardians of the status quo in 1963 (and now) did not want us to know that the assassination of our popular President was NOT the result of a simple act by a lone crazy person, because that would raise all sorts of possibilities in our minds regarding the potential role of our own government. Nor do our current guardians want us to know how poorly equipped our current election system is to express the will of the American people. That is why right wing media whores such as Tucker Carlson refer to those who question the results of the 2004 election as “grassy knoll conspiracy theorists” – which I proudly admit that I am. Furthermore, the failure of our government to ever acknowledge the truth about the JFK assassination helps to discourage doubts about our current election system, because this failure contributes to a general atmosphere that facilitates the belief that our democracy is in better shape than it really is.
In the following thread I discuss in much more detail what I see as the similarities between these two awful events (in the interest of avoiding making this thread too long, I placed the bulk of this discussion in another thread):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x402631