Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The RW does NOT control the media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:15 PM
Original message
The RW does NOT control the media
We have to face it, the anti-conservative bias in America has reached monumental proportions. Don't believe me? Just look at these facts!

1. The Nation is used as a primary source every day by C-span’s Washington Journal, while the Weekly Standard is never even quoted.

2. Guests like Noam Chomsky appear regularly on the cable tv networks, while conservatives such as Pat Buchanan are silenced.

3. David Corn produces his own TV show, while Robert Novak is marginalized.

4. The most listened to radio show hosts are Mike Malloy, Randi Rhodes, and Stephanie Miller. Try as they may, conservative hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, and Sean Hannity can’t find stations willing to carry conservatives.

5. Liberal programs dominate the lineup at the top talk radio station in the country (WABC) and the top news network in the country (Fox News).

6. Prominent liberals control all major tv media outlets.

7. Anti-war liberals such as Maureen Dowd and Judith Miller consistently attacked Bush’s motives leading up to the Iraq war.

8. All of Armed Forces radio’s political content is liberals. Conservatives are consistently barred from AFR’s airwaves.

9. Liberal news sources owned by liberal cult leaders, such as the Washington Times, are quoted without disclosure of their ownership.

10. Conservatives never appear alone on a segment on TV, while liberals often appear alone. When there is a conservative, typically there are two-three liberals to counter the lone conservative.

11. While Bush’s alleged lies are trumpeted in the media, the events leading up to Clinton’s impeachment were ignored and dismissed.

12. Liberal pundits such as Molly Ivins and Jim Hightower appear daily on cable news networks, while Dick Morris and Ann Coulter are silenced.

13. Liberal billionaires such as George Soros buy up 100’s of thousands of liberal books to drive them up the NY Times Best Seller list. There is nobody on the right that does the same.

14. Attacks on the patriotism of conservative war heroes such as Dick Cheney and Rick Santorum are tolerated, without a response from conservatives.

15. Rumors on liberal web sites are peddled as fact in major media, while news items on drudge.com are panned.

16. Atheist liberals have unfettered access to Tv, and in fact have their own national TV networks, but no conservative Christian has access to Tv.

17. The DNC mobilizes liberals to write identical letters to the editor about issues of the day, called “Astroturf”. Conservatives do no such thing.

18. Issues important to liberals such as the “living wage” and Socialized healthcare dominate the debate in the press.

19. The funerals of dead soldiers, used to push the anti-war liberal cause, are broadcast daily across the country.

20. While noone was punished for the memos "proving" that George W. Bush skipped out on his guard service, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth were quickly ostracized and couldn’t gain access to major media.

21. The liberal media tells conservative Hollywood stars such as Vince Vaughn, Bruce Willis, and Arnold Schwartzenegger to "shut up", while liberal stars like Barbra Streissand, Tim Robbins, and Alec Baldwin are given the respect that a full time politico would receive.
(any more?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or my version
The media is librul becuase because Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Mike Gallagher, Dennis Prager, Hugh Hewitt, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Brit Hume, Tony Snow, G Gordon Liddy, Dr. Laura, Michael Medved, George Will, Ollie North, Robert Novak, Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingrahamn, Peggy Noonan, William Safire, Andrew Sullivan, Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, Bernard Goldberg, The Washington Times, Bill Krystsol, David Frum, Brent Bozell, Charles Krauthammer, David Horowitz, Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes, Fred Barnes, William Bennett, Lawrence Kudlow, Steve Forbes, Dennis Miller, Matt Drudge, Byron York, Fox News, Sinclair Broadcasting, Clear Channel, the National Review, The Heritage Foundation, The Hoover Instutution, The Weekly Standard, The American Enterprise Institue, The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), The Cato Institute, The Club For Growth, The Federalist Society, NewsMax, TownHall, The NY Post, FreeRepublic.Com, any number of Christian Funamentalist ministers, and the NRA, told me so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetualWinter Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. Or the media is moderate sensationalism instead of news...
The left says its right wing, the right says its left wing. I'd have to say overall its pretty moderate, but its all about sensationalism not news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Agreed
You can kind of tell when someone is iether doing something right or very wrong when both extremes don't like what you are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qibing Zero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
61. I have to disagree - the middle ground argument is a fallacy.
The hardcore rightists keep pushing US politics as a whole (including the media) further toward the right, while repeating the 'liberal bias' BS just to advance their cause. I'm sure the fact they don't seem to want to stop until every last person agrees with them factors into that as well of course.

What's so liberal about the media? The fact that every once in a while a news analyst will be on a show and actually say something that a decent dem would say? The once a week moment where the journalist asks some asshole a hard hitting question? We've been praising the few moments we even get THAT to happen for how long now?


Now, the media isn't completely the conservatives' slave, of course (fox news et al. aside). The issue is that, just like the greater American public, they're more than willing to give people in 'respectable' offices the benefit of the doubt instead of being skeptical as they should be. It took people DYING to get the media to wake up and stick it to the failure government officials. They also blow ridiculous things out of proportion, and ignore the less 'hearty' news because of it's supposed bore-factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. What the Cons have done
is move the "middle ground" by "working the refs". Years ago fair and balanced was a liberal Dem and a conservative Republican, or vice versa (yes, there were liberal Republicans).

Now, liberal Dems by and large don't have access to the media, save the occasional Kennedy appearance. Only conservative Dems like Biden seem to appear, along with RW wackos like Santorum and Brownback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I take your point ...
... however, there is still the problem of the MainStreamMedia, to whit, the major news programs on ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.

In the aftermath of last November's Ohio election fraud, NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE major outlets, including CNN, even touched upon what was happening in Ohio for weeks (hearings, lawsuits, election workers put under oath to testify, etc.) "Nightline" and "Aaron Brown" were the only two shows that discussed the matter -- and both did it laughingly as 'an internet rumour that has gotten out of hand'.

While many of us watch shows like 60 Minutes, The Daily Show, etc., Mr. and Mrs. Midland America still don't know half of what's going on in the country, thanks to the MSM.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Read more carefully, Nance
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
48. You're right, of course -- didn't get the 'sarcasm' ...
... also not familiar with many names mentioned (don't know who they are, left or right) as I live in Canada and, very unfortunately, we don't get a lot of the TV shows referenced here.

This may seem crazy to you guys out there, but I didn't even know who Keith Olberman was (!) until a few months ago, when I saw some links posted here to his various interviews from his show.

But all is not lost -- we don't get FAUX NEWS either (which is just as well, because I'm sure I'd be glued to it just to hear what some of these wingnuts are saying!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. You forgot Keith Olbermann - who went well more
in-depth than Aaron Brown and Nightline - btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. And while you point out correctly that Nightline & Aaron Brown.....
...didn't take it all that seriously, maybe the fact that they raised the issue at all has something to do with why both shows no longer exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. driven by the dollar. The media is socially liberal, such as Fox
with the sleaziest programs of all. But the in matters of politics the are supporting the Bush agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think he meant the news media (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. What do you mean by "socially liberal"?
When was the last time you saw a show where the theme is gun control or equal wages for women? If you're talking about barely-dressed, breast implanted girls, you're talking about conservative values that appeal to white males.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes, we need more of those "values"
for the sake of "fair and balanced". :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Yeah, FOX is rife with
pro-union, pro-gun-control, pro-choice, anti-racism programming.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. You associate sleaze with liberalism?
Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think the whole "evil MSM" is overblown.
The media is being manipulated by *'s cronies by comtroling acess and also because serious news gets lower ratings than sensationalist Infotainment. There is no RW conspiracy in the major networks (besides FOX).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Oh, please
Digging up all of the dirt on * and Cheney would be more sensational and lucrative than the constant fawning and enabling. ALL of the BIG MEDIA are run but ultra-rightists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. No conspiracy needed - the RW _owns_ the major networks
That's hardly a secret, see here:

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/owners.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Right, they dont have to conspire, they can do it in the open
Our media organizations, institutions, and infrastructure are largely owned by corporations. No conspiricy neccessary, they own the media, they dont have to conspire to control it, they do control it.

Bush doesnt control the media, he is just supported by the people who do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Have you put this list at a blog? (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great list. Explains why only NOW is covering the clusterf#$k
going on in the Gulf - armed, fenced prison-like camps for illegal immigrants who are working for those cleaning up New Orleans and the rest of the Gulf.

This should be a top story on all the networks, but no, it's only covered on the slashed-to-a-half-hour (so Tucker Carlson can have yet another outlet) PBS show "NOW".

Bartcop has been pounding the Myth of the Liberal Media since before 9/11, and it's only gotten worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. The leftleaning and objective media were shut out for TEN YEARS already.
That was how the GOP gained all the power they wanted.

Fortunately, the postKatrina, postFitzgerald America isn't buying the propaganda anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. You forgot the sarcasm thingy
People are going to think this is sincere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. ya had me gooooinnnnnggggg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appnzllr Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. What?
I would question why this post was put on the front page of the Democratic Underground. And I would question whether the person who posted the original is really a liberal. It seems like what a right-winger would say. There is plenty of documentation (see "The Right-Wing Noise Machine" for one) that points out that the media is being twisted to the right. The further right the right-wingers go, the further right the mainstream media have to go in order to remain in the middle. All of these points that this person makes above are worthless. They are not points that should make a liberal feel good about any "progress" that we are making in getting our message to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think you missed something. (and Welcome to DU!!!)
The OP is dripping :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appnzllr Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It is not sarcasm
It is not sarcasm when the OP speaks of liberal rumors and Drudge news. The whole post should be removed from the front page of DU. If DU wants to keep it in the discussion forums, that's up to them. But this is not sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. What's it called? Opposite day?
Everything the OP listed is the opposite of reality.

Of course, if you were to browse that "other site" you would, no doubt, see nearly every one of those statements taken as truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Liked that, "war heroes such as Dick Cheney
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 11:34 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
and Rick Santorum...!"

I don't know about Santorum, but if that doesn't tell you the credentials of Yankeedem, I don't know what would. Nice the way they use lower case with Dem and Commie names, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think you have the wrong Marx as your avatar....
Don't you really want that Commie guy with the big beard? The one not particularly known for his sense of humor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobBoudelangFan69 Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Love Your Deadpan Delivery Of Humor. You Did Hook A Couple...
of big ones.

Tanx for de laff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. This is not sarcasm?
If you don't think so you are on the wrong site my friend. The OP made his point very well if you ask me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. WTF was my first reaction...till I read #8
Then it was obvious. :)

No, it shouldn't be removed. Specifically, it refutes the Liberal Media Bias myth with every point. It just does it in Bushstyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. :kiss kiss: you are adorable
come to my troll farm. I'll feed you well. a billy goat gruff every other thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
52. Get a sense of humor
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

Didn't think it was needed, but I guess it went over your head. Didn't know I had to prove my liberal credentials to someone with 5 posts, but you learn something everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Hi appnzllr!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. LOL - thanks for the smile - your post was just what the orginal post
needed.

I get a smile from the original post - and then a smilr from yours.

It is going to be a great day!

and welcome to DU!

:toast:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErisFiveFingers Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Uhm... yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appnzllr Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. Thanks for your support
Thanks for everyone's support. I regularly read the postings on DU, but I rarely post. You probably were wondering if I was some moron or something. No. I was skimming the post, and when I got to the "liberal rumors" and "Drudge news", I stopped. It just put me over the edge. I've had enough of all of this right-wing propaganda.

I tell you what. I really need this Thanksgiving weekend. Clear the head. Thanks again.

Anyway, have there been any posts about the departure of the president (??) of Amtrak? He says that an item in the Bush budget is to bankrupt Amtrak, give/sell the track to some company and make the track something that other companies can use. The Bush administration thinks that Amtrak should be self-sufficient. I think it would be a shame for Amtrak to go away. There should be more rail (inner and inter-city).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. David Gunn, Amtrak
I heard him interviewed yesterday - NPR? PBS? AAR?
And he was right on it as to the Thief-in-Chief and pals and their
plans to steal it in pieces. If I can find a link, will post it here.
We have arrived at the fascist state, no doubt about it.
Haven't noticed any specific links anywhere yet.

PS - rode the Empire Builder, Chicago-Seattle in May 2002.
A unique travel experience for a North American...hope future generations can experience it. Long-distance trains are kinda
like a land cruise, except Minot, ND ain't no Aruba. There were
six inches of snow at Glacier Station...in May!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JWS Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. Liberal or conservative
The MSM hasn't been fulfilling the role that it is meant to. It consistently looked away from administration failures in the run up to the war and during the '04 elections. Additionally, liberals such as Bob Woodward, and Dan Rather get pounded if they so much as put a foot in the wrong place, while Limbaugh and O'Reilly get free passes on lie after lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. "liberals such as Bob Woodward" - LOL - this is a fun thread. Bob's
book screwing the Dems and helping the GOP is scheduled for release summer 2006 - just before the election.

He was funny on Larry King the other night as he pulled a few headlines to his writings that implied he was going after someone other than Dems, as he then told us about how truthful and unbiased he is!

I guess Woodward assumes we do not actually read his stuff, note the thrust, and note the timing.

Actually I see Bob as mainly a corporate whore, with just enough right wing to keep the checks coming in. I do not see him as anti-left, except as needed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sorry, but I dont consider your post to be -
"Bare and Phallanced."
(cough cough, choke choke, tee-hee)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. I think some of you may need this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. good one - need a common sense one too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. Okay - This is why I'm grateful I don't have a TV:
I fell for this, albeit briefly. By the time I hit #3, I figured it out.

My life is All Librul, All Day Long, thanks to me and the rock I live under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. well done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrutineer Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. Don’t forget
Don’t forget that the president of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a former co-chair of Democratic National Committee.

And how about those fake government sponsored news reports and media figures on the government payroll that trash Bush administration policies like No Child Left Behind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. Not to mention how annoying it is
when those liberals complain about being persecuted. Persecuted? They are in control of all of the branches of government!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
43. this is SARCASM people
The OP should make that clear thou.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. Maga Dittos to you, my friend!
With *facts* like these on our side, we certainly don't need to debate those ameracun hatin libruls, now do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. Even the title is funny! Good show.


i·ro·ny (î'rə-nç, î'ər-)
n., pl. -nies.

The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.

An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.

A literary style employing such contrasts for humorous or rhetorical effect. See synonyms at wit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
50. Well, there is a difference between the corporate media
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 03:48 PM by Cleita
and the independent media. Unfortunately the corporate media gets its instructions it appears from the RNC and the White House. The independent media struggles to get the stories out and many of them are afraid to be too upfront because it's becoming apparent that it's dangerous to be an honest journalist these days.

I know I am being serious here because your excellent post was meant to be a parody. I had to say it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
53. Ok, I'm back- and this is sarcasm
Hope you figured this out. Glad you enjoyed it- was kind of hoping to add your additions to the list.

I was inspired by this
http://www.infidels.org/misc/humor/lioaca.html

I'll go with these additions

22. The CPB, a PUBLICALLY funded TV network, is run by a Democratic idealogue, who pays cronies to monitor right-wing thought so that he can stamp out all conservatism on PBS. (scrutineer)

23. Important stories about missing teenage white blonde girls in Aruba are ignored, so that ANOTHER Cindy Sheehan tour stop can be covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
55. Vince Vaughn is conservative?
That's sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Maybe Jen Anniston
is working on him and making him you know, think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
57. heh
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
59. Oh, irony. We don't get that here.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennisnyc Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
60. and a primetime MSNBC newsanchor was recently taken into the
offices of the higher-ups because he was having too many republicans on his CLEARLY objective newscast...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
63. Never mind
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 09:53 PM by Canuckistanian
Self-delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. C post 53
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. A bit slow on the uptake tonight
Must be the beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
65. Ha! I knew it!
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 10:00 PM by Patsy Stone
It was obvious last year when the networks refused to give a decent and respectful amount of coverage and airtime to Reagan's funeral.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
67. Another TruthTeller...thanks for setting things straight.
Keep this, book mark it, it's an historic document.

A manifesto based on listening to the voices.

Recommended and Required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
68. Poor poor conservos.. gettin' no respect
Edited on Wed Nov-23-05 03:58 AM by SoCalDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC