Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woodward leak: No network coverage this morning!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 07:17 AM
Original message
Woodward leak: No network coverage this morning!?!?
Have been surfing the three major morning news shows. No coverage of the WashPost story about the first WH leak of Plame to Woodward. Instead, they all led with Cheney and Bush's counterattack against critics of their Iraq War strategy.

Meanwhile, AOL News is spinning this as helping Scooter?

What is going on? Is this Russia, or is Rover just back in charge? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I saw it last night
I have "Anus in the Morning" on now, I do not know if he covered it, as I just flipped it on...he usually repeats his main themes, so we shall see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. CNN covered the Woodward leak story before 7 am this morning. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was on CBS Morning News at 5AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DelawareValleyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fox is too busy covering
the latest missing teenage white girl. Check out their home page.

http://www.foxnews.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. What More Is To Say?
Methinks people are still trying to sort out if this thing means something or not. The wingnuts are claiming this takes Libby off the hook (how this has anything to do with perjury is beyond me) and if that's not being blast faxed and chirped around on the talk shows, consider that a positive.

No matter what comes, this revelation just kicked this scandal back into full investigation mode...and that is a good thing, too.

Patience...Fitzgerald works on his schedule, not anyone elses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC