Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Judith) Miller: Feds Should Better Protect Journalists and Their Sources

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:28 PM
Original message
(Judith) Miller: Feds Should Better Protect Journalists and Their Sources

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175826,00.html

Miller: Feds Should Better Protect Journalists and Their Sources


NEW YORK — On the day Washington Post editor Bob Woodward disclosed that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby wasn’t the first Bush administration official to reveal the secret identity of a CIA operative, the former New York Times reporter once at the center of the leak case continued to push for a shield law protecting journalists and their sources.

...

“I think we are in need of a federal shield law to protect the relationship between journalists and sources,” Miller told the conference, held by the Web log network Open Source Media . “I went to jail over the source of a story I never wrote.”

...

Scrutiny of the mainstream media's work is important, Miller told FOXNews.com after her speech, but "not transparency when it comes to who your sources are.

"In investigative reporting, you cannot get around the use of anonymous sources. But you see if other people will go on the record with that same information," she said. "The whole purpose of getting news out depends on your sources."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why do we need a shield law so reporters can refuse to report news?
That's what I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only If the Sources are Whistleblowers
trying to make the public aware of government or corporate wrong doing. Sorry, fasci-doll, but you aint protecting a whistleblower. You are protecting a crime and its criminals. And fuck you for calling the public stupid, traitor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. If a source is breaking the law
They should get no protection. If the source is ratting on someone ELSE who is breaking the law, I think they should be afforded protection. In other words, I'd support protection for Libby to bring down Rove, Cheney, or Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Judy, just save it for your...
... tell-all book. We know you like writing fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. They need a shield law to protect
Propagandist and political operatives posing as journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I must disagree, Judith. If you are a mouthpiece for those,....
,...conspiring to betray and lie and mislead the entire nation, WHICH IS FRAUD, you should NEVER EVER GET PROTECTION BECAUSE YOUR DAMN JOB IS TO DELIVER THE TRUTH, THE TRUTH, THE TRUTH!!!

YOU DISHONORABLE BITCH, YOU!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. we need a law to make it illegal for journalists to work secretly ..
... for the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. The whore of Babylon still prancing like she is Joan of Arc.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 10:10 PM by Burried News
Still spinning after all these years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That is beautifully phrased (and very apt)
well done :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. What if the sources are liars? Shouldn't there be a truth test.
If your source told a lie, no anonymity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Protect soureces? How many journalists did we kill in Iraq? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. The American people need a shield
law to protect them from propagandists like Judith Miller ~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes. Instead of a "Shield Law" we need a "Shill Law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cry me a fucking river, shill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GL1 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. These goddam journalists think they're so important
I am sick of phrases like "protecting sources", "freedom of the press" and all the rest of that crap. These are men and women with a larger responsibility than protecting the privacy of their sources.

If top Bush administration officials were "leaking" Valerie Plame's name to them, why in gods name didn't they write the real story:

Bush wants a war and will do anything to get it

These journalists were first hand witnesses to this indisputable fact.

Stupid fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMAN51 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Journalists should do a better job of informing the public
and not be a willing tool to spread the bogus propaganda of the administration to make one look like a brilliant writer with great inside information.
Also, if your source is breaking the law by telling the information (as opposed to identifying unlawful conduct of others) it should have absolutely no protection as the reporter is the witness to the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let's talk about needs
America needs journalist, not snake oil salesmen for the WH. We need unbiased investigative reporting and an honest free press. We need a media that's not afraid to tell the people the ugly unvarnished truth. We need integrity and honesty from our media if we're going to survive as a nation. Ms Miller, I think our needs trump yours. Be gone you vile blemish on the ass of America.

It's good to see Miller is the golden girl of FOX now, she just seems to fit there, don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. Open Source Media=Pajamas Media=wingnuts
It's fitting that the Queen of Iraq speaks to this group. And what a name they have picked for themselves,"Open Source Media" in the tradition of NCLB and Clear Skies.

Why does Corn associate with this group? Faux News now this?


------------------------------------------------------------------------


November 16, 2005
Vaporware

Pajamas Media has launched under a new moniker, Open Source Media, or in their officially-sanctioned shorthand OSM™. Yes, the trademark symbol is part of the abbreviation to remind people that they're not that "open source".

~snip~

http://www.thetalentshow.org/archives/002201.html


New Blog Venture Unveils All-Star Contributors, Prepares for November Debut

Pajamas Media confirms "Instapundit" Glenn Reynolds, CNBC's Larry Kudlow, Michael Barone, David Corn, and Claudia Rosett among Editorial Board Members

http://pajamasmedia.com/pj-pressroom.php

OSM Editorial Advisory Board


OSM Editorial Advisory Board

Glenn Reynolds, Chair

Michael Barone

Austin Bay

Adam Bellow

Tim Blair

Tammy Bruce

Marc Cooper

David Corn

Richard Fernandez

Jose Guardia

Jane Hall

Larry Kudlow

Michael Ledeen

Clifford May

John Podhoretz

Claudia Rosett

Mark Steyn

http://www.osm.org/site/articles/editboardmain/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

see also: http://www.dailykos.com/tag/pajamas%20media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. We don't need a shield law
when we don't have any investigative reporters nor a true free press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Judith is not a journalist. She's a hired spook and war promoter.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC