|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Boredtodeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:16 PM Original message |
Josh Marshall says: Stay up....big news brewing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berner59 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. great... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cantstandbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
50. If it's the Woodward story...it's already out. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. how long and pointed where?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. I find Josh to be a fairly sober analyst who wouldn't tease without reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah, except for that whole 'tectonic plates in DC shifting' story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Yeah, WTF was that about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. It did, but it happened so slowly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
106. I agree. Somehow the expected shock never happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Actually, it did happen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Damn! I HAVE to go to bed soon so I can get up early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dalloway (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. And to think that I made a quick peek over here before turning in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaggieSwanson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. Can do - I have the day of tomorrow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Oh, let's start guessing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. sweet - he usuallly doesn't pull any gimmicks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. I guess this is the silver lining to the late night cloud of work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrumpyGreg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Never heard of Josh Marshall so I think I'll go to bed---I can wait for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm ready for something big...impeachment!?!?! OK, one can hope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. Possibly it's this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Ooh! Can't wait to read the whole thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Senior administration official=KKKRove? We can hope! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. the woodward who keeps saying there's nothing there, move along? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Rumors are flying that Cheney is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. YOWZA!!! Not a bit surprised that woodward is entangled, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
59. I've heard speculation that he's a covert agent too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:03 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. Yeah, there was a thread going on about this. Dang, gotta find it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Wowee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
96. The Washington Post has been the most brazen and now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 03:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
100. it had to be Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. OK. Let us all guess what it is while we wait! My guess, ROVE indictment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FranzFerdinand (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. the government fixed the NFL so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Original message |
Dollars to doughnuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. VERY interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. God dammit. I was about to go to sleep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
25. I hope it's not more Italian news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FranzFerdinand (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
26. it's up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. That could be big news. Woodward is close to a lot of the top guys in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. as-yet-unnamed senior administration official |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Mamma mia!!! I remember Woodward on Larry King. The rest of the panel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:41 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Yes! I remember. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:12 AM Response to Reply #35 |
68. I remember this LKdead interview as well, and had the same impression. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:20 AM Response to Reply #68 |
74. i agree on the slam dunk thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Cheney or even Bush possibly? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. he had a chat with bush for his book. when he got tenets slam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:19 AM Response to Reply #53 |
72. I posted#68 before I had read your post. What is this Slam Dunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:22 AM Response to Reply #72 |
75. i believe so. it was right after this tenet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 03:58 AM Response to Reply #26 |
103. Christ- remember Woodward's recent appearance on Larry King? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. have about an hour and half....... shoot or more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
30. I've got quite the crush on Josh Micah Marshall... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
31. Breaking news..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fozzledick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. Update |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
38. But Woodward was so sure Fitz wouldn't have any indictments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. You're giving Woodward any credence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:07 AM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Hell no. I was being facetious (sp?). Woodward DID testify on Monday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. I still don't understand what the fuss is all about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:47 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. who did he get it from? just more into the story. it isnt dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
41. That night on CNN, Woodward acted weird and he stated he knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. Who told Woodward? John Hannah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
44. From the article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. Ok....let's think here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:10 AM Response to Reply #45 |
66. George "Slam Dunk" Tenet, for one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
78. rmember before all this, tenet was pissed about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
47. "senior administration official" NOT= "senior White House official" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Ari could be a SAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:18 AM Response to Reply #47 |
71. Wasn't it John Dean who specified that a "senior administration official" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:05 AM Response to Reply #71 |
90. That's my recollection. That's what I was thinking of when I posted this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 06:08 AM Response to Reply #90 |
107. Correct, Cheney would not be called a WH Official |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
48. Here's the link to the WP story!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Woodward: Fitzgerald "junkyard dog", investigation "laughable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:47 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Put it in LBN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Too late it's already done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
capi888 (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
51. Link To Washinton Post Article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
52. Woodward is a hypocritical tool. Commenting on the issue without... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:55 AM Response to Reply #52 |
88. I agree. But this makes Russert a HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:59 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Everyone knows Russert was involved. He admitted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 02:24 AM Response to Reply #89 |
97. I agree. I think that it was unethical though, prior to the time that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
57. Why didn't Woodward go to Fitzgerald a long time ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
60. Woodward is not cleared to get that kind of info. Doesn't this mean that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Yes, because Novak said he had two sources and ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:11 AM Response to Reply #61 |
67. So Woodward and Novak worked with Fitzgerald. But Judy wouldn't and so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:15 AM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Woodward conveniently stated he didn't think it was classified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:19 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. I think it was Bush. Not willing to bet anything on it, but I have a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:23 AM Response to Reply #69 |
76. That is troubling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:07 AM Response to Reply #69 |
91. Would it be sweet justice if it was "Slam Dunk" Tenet himself? ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Athame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:48 AM Response to Reply #60 |
87. Just to clarify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamtechus (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-05 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
62. Just more republican parlor games -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
63. This sounds troubling: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:25 AM Response to Reply #63 |
79. And Pincus denies that Woodard told him this before October 2003. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:27 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. russert denies libby told him. a pattern n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:20 AM Response to Reply #81 |
95. No, I believe Pincus. Woodward's trying to cover his ass with the WP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
70. It's probably NOT Cheney based on something else Woodward said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:27 AM Response to Reply #70 |
80. Hmmm. Well, I think that indicates that it may well be Uncle Dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:30 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. people dont like and wont vote cheney. i prefer bush having another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:31 AM Response to Reply #70 |
84. But yo have to remember these "people" - I happen to think they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 03:02 AM Response to Reply #84 |
99. Ab-so-fuckin‘-lutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 03:28 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. ChumP in the water... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:15 AM Response to Reply #70 |
94. Dick MAY be the "nominee" in 2008. Why? Martial Law, for starters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 04:09 AM Response to Reply #70 |
104. I'd actually say it suggests the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beltanefauve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 05:01 AM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Hardly nominee material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
77. Oh wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
83. wrong thread, lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hopeisaplace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
85. I'de like to feel confident about US Elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
86. Woodwards whereabouts a month ago -prime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
92. Woodward is "ex" ONI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 02:33 AM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Damn I think you're right. It's the only way to make sense of all of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 03:44 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Yalie, member of a secret society, Naval ROTC,.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #102 |
108. Maybe he really has been an undercover CIA agent all these years? To |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
93. what, Cheney told Woodward about Plame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
109. Is it safe to get some sleep NOW, 13 hours later? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-16-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. you...... are funny. wink n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC