MEME: Killing people and stealing their oil is not an energy policy

[yurbud]

the oil supply will decline in a couple of decades to the point that it's no longer economically viable to use it, but the emnity we're earning will last centuries and is a debt Americans, not oil companies will carry.

[BlueEyedSon]

1. Having OUR soldiers die for it isn't too smart either...... nt

[The Backlash Cometh]

2. The understatement of the century.

[yurbud]

9. Good quote. More people here know Norquist than Freepers do

they correctly keep him in the closet.

He's a fucking ghoul, but at least we get the straight dope on GOP goals from him.

[bullimiami]

3. its not a meme. its the fact.

[shance]

4. That should be a bumper sticker.

Thanks yurbud*

[Ontheinternets]

5. Why do we need oil, there are other

alternatives for energy. we can make our own energy, if the government gets its heads out of the clouds, we can have a more sane energy policy. We wouldn't have to kill or still anything for anybody, that make sence to me.

[BlueEyedSon]

6. Not yet there aren't (feasible alternatives)

[yurbud]

8. most "aren't feasible" because they aren't being done on a large scale

and the fact that they aren't done is used as an argument for not doing them--making the problem that much worse.

[yurbud]

7. Brazil is doing well with biofuels--the sad fact is, we AREN'T getting

the oil for us--it's for our oil companies.

It's essentially a hostile take over of French and Russian oil concessions at gunpoint.

[Donald Ian Rankin]

10. No, you're wrong!

Killing people and stealing their oil clearly *is* an energy policy.

Allow me to present as exhibit A the energy policy of the Bush administration, to wit "Kill people and steal their oil".

Case closed, I fear :-)

[yurbud]

11. not a long term or successful one though