Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

everybody in the whole world thought there were WMD'S...Bullshit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:28 AM
Original message
everybody in the whole world thought there were WMD'S...Bullshit
i never did. and those that did believe it? what do you expect, they were lied to.

this whole war arguement sounds more and more like a 3rd grade school yard debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I did
But I thought the WMDs were here in the USA, Russia, Israel, China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the term has been used to death
weapons of mass destruction weapons of mass destruction weapons of mass destruction jesus! everybody has weapons that can kill masses of people, they aren't like some new kind of weapon that no one else has for corn's sake.

and we have the most and the baddest wmd's ever, and we've used them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. All their talking points are 3rd grade stuff
I mean what adult, when caught hot handed, says "well so and so did that" and such nonense. Wrong is wrong and is not negated becuz someone else "does it too".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Torie Clark: "Russia, France and Germany all thought they had WMD"
pentagon spokesperson for the ** regime said that yesterday on CNN. No one EVER refutes that. It is patently false at least in regard to the mushroom cloud BS. I remember reading here for months before the invasion how all of those countries were Warning us NOT to go in because.... of the horror of a pandora's box we have today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No everybody thought Iraq had WMD
see my post below.

Also, Hans Blix would be another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julianer Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The Downing St Memos
call the intelligence 'thin'.

Thus the UK govt, for one, did not belief Iraq had WMD. This is not surprising since they received all of the Inspectors reports saying that the weapons had been destroyed in the early 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Italian, French and German intel as well...
the bushco** regime ignored them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please do a google search on Mohammed ElBaradei
I have to run & get ready for work now, but if you google ElBaradei (sp?) with WMD & Iraq, you will see that this man, who heads the IAEA and is now a Nobel Peace Prize winner, you will see that he states Iraq has no WMD.

Also, check out Scott Ritter. He was the chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq in the 1990s. He was probably even more emphatic than ElBaradei that Iraq had no WMD.

They are two pretty authoritative figures if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Never. Never ever.
It was quite obvious to me in 2002 that the PNAC plan to invade Iraq was in place, and they'd do or say whatever they had to in order to carry it out. The minute Bush started his Iraq rhetoric, I knew we were in for a banquet of bullshit.

:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I never believed it either, mopaul
not for one second
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Even for the ones who believed it, should have known two days
into the war that Iraq didn't have them. Iraq didn't use them against an invading army! Instead these brain dead followers chose to believe an even bigger lie that Saddam moved them and hid them. Now why the hell would he done that? Saving them for a rainy day?

Using common sense is NOT a republican trait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. they could still be there! maybe he buried em' in the sand!
everbody thought they had em', the president wouldn't lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. saying the president wouldn't lie, is the wilfull ignorance defense..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. But you see, they don't really mean that
They may say that they believed the president, that they thought the president wouldn't just lie, but they don't mean it.

What they are really saying is that when the Presidents approval rating is that high, and the majority of good God-fearin' Muricans want to spill some Ayrab blood, it's a huge political risk to vote against him, and they chickened out. Fact is, voting against any Presidential authority to go after Iraq would likely have cost a few Dems their seats in 04, and they knew that.

I'm not excusing them. There are times you throw your aspirations out the window and do what you know is right, and this certainly should have been one of those times. We need more principled Dems in those seats, plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. no, no.. didn't you hear
They moved the WMD to Syria!! So, we must invade there next to get them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. I didn't believe that Iraq had WMD until Powell gave his speech to the UN.
I was against the war until I heard Powell. I trusted Powell. I thought he would study the intelligence, ensure he had all the facts, not put his name to a pack of lies. Boy was I fooled. But then so was congress (or at least some in congress). But I know for a fact France didn't believe Iraq had WMDs and Wilson was casting doubt on the whole nuclear weapons issue. I could have gone either way until Powell. I hate that man for abusing my trust in him and letting brush con the U.S. into war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. i never looked up to powell, so i don't feel betrayed
but his sudden bail out from all the chaos did hearten me a bit toward him. maybe he has a soul afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. It has a certain revisionist appeal
Edited on Tue Nov-15-05 08:05 AM by Kellanved
Just reading the old headlines paints another picture.


And watch this news report: after the Munich conference Fischer was painted "evil", "dumb", "impertinent", "an ostrich", "a weasel", even by respectable papers like the Washington Posts.
To my knowledge, none of those "journalists" has apologized yet. I'd say "Weasels", if that weren't an insult to weasels.



KWAME HOLMAN: Germany's foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, responded.

JOSCHKA FISCHER ( Translated ): We owe the Americans our democracy. They are very important for stability and peace especially. We Germans would never have been able to free ourselves from the Nazi regime without America. The Americans allowed us to build up our democracy, but in this democracy my generation has learnt... ( in English ) You have to make the case, and to make the case in a democracy, you have to be convinced yourself, and excuse me, I am not convinced. This is my problem and I cannot go to the public and say, "well, let's go to war because there are reasons and so on," and I don't believe in that.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/jan-june03/bg_divisions_2-10.html#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Exactly. Wasn't that the plan anyway? Isn't that why they lied?
So now its not their fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC