Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF? I can't take another month of this crap!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:39 PM
Original message
WTF? I can't take another month of this crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wouldn't worry. It will be minor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I live on the TX gulf coast and I'm not worried.
It's going down into the 40s tomorrow night and hurricanes don't like cold water or weather. No hurricane would dare! :grr: I hope!
But I don't know weather conditions elsewhere, so I also hope it just goes away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's like constant terror threats.
Weather guys get all hot and bothered over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Holy hurricane batman.... just how much does this suck? I can't
friggin believe it.... I really can't. We need more jet fuel being burned, more incendiary devices going off, more humvees running around all day burning fuel, we need the single largest polluter on the planet to do what they do best... really.

http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/10_reasons_militarism_bad.html
Ten Reasons Why Militarism is Bad for the Environment
by Simon Doolittle
As the world faces war with Iraq, many are understandably concerned with the immediate horror that war would bring. Beyond these very real dangers, we should take this opportunity to re-examine whether militarism is a healthy thing for our society and our planet. Reducing our dependence on the rule of force and de-militarizing our society would not only make the world more peaceful and free up resources to address the underlying causes of terrorism, it would also have a dramatically positive impact on our health and environment. Here are ten reasons why.

1. Militaries are notorious polluters.
According to geographer Joni Seager, "anywhere in the world, a military presence is virtually the single most reliable predictor of environmental damage." Since the end of the Cold War, many plans to convert military bases to civilian use have been cancelled because the sites are contaminated beyond any hope of restoration. And military pollution isn't limited to bases, it does significant damage to the environment at large. In the US - the world's most oil-thirsty country - the largest single consumer of oil is the Pentagon. Together, the world's militaries consume as much petroleum as Japan - the world's second largest economy - and produce an estimated 6-10% of global air pollution. As Seager concludes: "Militaries…that have little else in common share a distinctive environmental sensibility - namely, one of disregard."

2. Militarism robs other social needs.
As President Dwight Eisenhower said, "Every gun that is made, every warship fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed" - and, one should add, pressing environmental needs. In 2004, President Bush hopes to increase the US military budget to $399.1 billion. Worldwide military spending - about $798 billion in 2000 - has recently increased for the first time since the end of the Cold War. That's a lot of money not spent on finding ways to reduce poverty, hunger, and environmental degradation. Allowing social ills such as poverty, illiteracy, and hunger to fester only deepens the disparities that often lie at the heart of many environmental problems. Since militaries are such notorious polluters, heavy military spending is also a dramatic pollution subsidy. It fosters a military culture that casts aside environmental concerns as not "serious" enough to warrant attention. As one American military commander put it, "We're in the business of protecting your country, not protecting the environment."

3. Nuclear weapons are an environmental catastrophe.
Nuclear weapons pose an environmental threat to humanity unprecedented in human history. Although the world escaped nuclear holocaust during the Cold War, the nuclear arms race has not stopped; India and Pakistan now have nuclear weapons, and North Korea may have them as well. According to some estimates, the radiation from weapons testing alone will eventually cause about 2.4 million cancer deaths worldwide. Hiroshima and Nagasaki offer a frightening reminder of the terror of nuclear weapons used in combat. A year after the US bombed the two cities, 140,000 were dead in Hiroshima and 70,000 in Nagasaki. Because of the much greater destructive capacity of modern nuclear weapons, a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan could kill up to 30 million people. A massive nuclear war involving half the world's weapons could trigger a worldwide "nuclear winter," blocking virtually all of the sun's light with debris, potentially for weeks, threatening everyone not killed directly in the blasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. My brain just melted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. back in the early 80s when i first got interested in metaphysics
i read a lot of books and there were predictions that terrible things would happen around 2000. when nothing happened i dismissed it, then came the tsunamai which shifted the earth on its axis (that was predicted), it was said that there would be water where there is land, and land where there is water, hurricanes, floods, drought. it was also said that this had to happen to cleanse the earth of all the toxins and the mess that we had made of it.

so could the psychic be right? anyone read any nostradamus? he said similar things -- also talked about the antichrist returning. some said he would first be loved by the people. could it be our own George W. Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. An ancient precedent
All the ancients thought that tyrants were, in general, beloved by the people, and tyranny was thought to be inherently democratic. Here, Nostradamus is simply adding Aristotle to Revelation to get a prophesy.

That being said, if you had asked me before 2000, I would have told you that I don’t buy into millennialism, that the cries of gloom and doom, especially on Y2K, are overstated. Yet something is up. Even if, however, the universe is ruled by random chance, there is such a thing as “bad times.” Even though it’s supposed to be even-odds, it’s entirely possible to sit down at a blackjack table and lose ten hands in a row. I know I’ve done it. Maybe the world is on a losing streak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. could be. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC