Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good list of doubts about Iraq intelligence that Bush kept hidden . . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ex Lion Tamer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:32 AM
Original message
Good list of doubts about Iraq intelligence that Bush kept hidden . . . .
"For future reference, here's a list of five key dissents about administration claims, all of which were circulated before the war but kept under wraps until after the war:


The Claim: Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, an al-Qaeda prisoner captured in 2001, was the source of intelligence that Saddam Hussein had trained al-Qaeda members to use biological and chemical weapons. This information was used extensively by Colin Powell in his February 2003 speech to the UN.

What We Know Now: Al-Libi's information was obtained under torture. Link. As early as February 2002, the Defense Intelligence Agency circulated a report, labeled DITSUM No. 044-02, saying that it was "likely this individual is intentionally misleading the debriefers." Link. This assessment was hidden from the public until after the war."

. . . .

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for this, Ex Lion Tamer; I've bookmarked for
future reference. And welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lion Tamer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you.
I've read DU for years. I finally had to start posting to preserve my sanity: I live in the land of delusional Hoosiers who still support Bush and needed an outlet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes indeed
I work with a dozen or so who still love Bush, hate Clinton, and think that Liberals are spreading lies about our humane treatment of prisoners.

Thanks for the link, and welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's another piece that makes sense:
http://yglesias.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/11/131029/55

On October 1, 2002, Tenet produced a declassified NIE. But Graham and Durbin were outraged to find that it omitted the qualifications and countervailing evidence that had characterized the classified version and played up the claims that strengthened the administration's case for war. For instance, the intelligence report cited the much-disputed aluminum tubes as evidence that Saddam "remains intent on acquiring" nuclear weapons. And it claimed, "All intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons and that these tubes could be used in a centrifuge enrichment program"--a blatant mischaracterization.

This is important to mention to Reich Wingers when they assert that "Dems had access to the same intel that the WH used in the run up to war" - That is, that the original NIE was classified and only EIGHT senators were allowed to see it - and those eight senators were bound not to repeat ANY OF THE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL to anyone.

sigh. sighsighsigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC