Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An incredible speech by the President on al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:40 PM
Original message
An incredible speech by the President on al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary

May 17, 2000

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT AT THE U.S. COAST GUARD ACADEMY'S 119th
COMMENCEMENT

Cadet Memorial Field
U.S. Coast Guard Academy
New London, Connecticut

11:40 A.M. EDT

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2000/05/000517-terror-usia1.htm

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Secretary Slater, Admiral Loy,
Rear Admiral Teeson, Captain Dillon, Senator Dodd, distinguished
members of the Diplomatic Corps, Dr. Haas, members of the faculty and
staff and honored guests; the friends, family and members of the Class of 2000.

(snip)

First, international terrorism is not new, but it is becoming
increasingly sophisticated. Terrorist networks communicate on the
worldwide web, too. Available weapons are becoming more destructive
and more miniaturized, just as the size of cell phones and computers
is shrinking -- shrinking to the point where a lot of you with large
hands like mine wonder if you'll be able to work the things before
long. You should understand that the same process of miniaturization
will find its way into the development of biological and chemical, and maybe even nuclear weapons. And it is something we have to be ready for.

As borders fade and old regimes struggle through transitions, the
chance for free agents looking to make a profit on weapons of
destruction and personal chaos is greater. In this sort of
environment, cooperation is profoundly important -- more vital than
ever. We learned that in the days leading up to the millennium.

We are joined today by the Ambassador from Jordan to the United
States, Dr. Warwan Muasher. He's sitting here behind me; he's an
excellent representative of his country. And I want to tell you a
story that, unfortunately, will not be the last example you will have
to face.

Last December, working with Jordan, we shut down a plot to place large bombs at locations where Americans might gather on New Year's Eve. We learned this plot was linked to terrorist camps in Afghanistan, and the organization created by Osama bin Ladin, the man responsible for the 1998 bombings of our embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, which cost the lives of Americans and hundreds of Africans.

A short time later, a customs agent in Seattle discovered bomb
materials being smuggled in to the U.S. -- the same materials used by
bin Ladin in other places. Thankfully, and thanks to Jordan, New
Year's passed without an attack. But the threat was real, and we had
to cooperate with them, with the Canadians, with others throughout the world.

So the first point I wish to make is, in a globalized world, we must
have more security cooperation, not less. In responding to terrorist
threats, our own strategy should be identical to your motto: semper
paratus, always ready.

Today, I'm adding over $300 million to fund critical programs to
protect our citizens from terrorist threats; to expand our
intelligence efforts; to improve our ability to use forensic evidence, to track terrorists; to enhance our coordination with state and local officials, as we did over New Year's, to protect our nation against possible attacks. I have requested now some $9 billion for counter-terrorism funding in the 2001 budget; that's 40 percent more than three years ago, and this $300 million will go on top of that. It sounds like a lot of money. When you see the evidence of what we're up against, I think you will support it, and I hope you will.

...more...

Broader perspective here:

http://truthout.org/docs_03/101303A.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. So much for the Repubs screaming...
That Clinton never tried to get, or to thwart, Osama!x(

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. So did he follow through with his 9.5 billion dollar request?
I don't remember anyone asking for that amount of money to combat terrorism until after 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, those were the days.
An ELECTED president that could fight terrorism with 9 billion dollars and no invasions.

As part of the transition to the APPOINTED president, Clinton's aides briefed Shrub's team about Bin Laden's plans including using airliners as weapons.

Contrast that to when Clinton took over in 1992 - no transition, all the federal budget numbers inaccurate, and a scorched-earth policy in the outgoing administration's paper trail.

History will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Options Remain Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thanks again for the reference Will
This is the achilles heel. We just need to assemble the research, make it as credible as possible.

Bush's greatest strength is the war on terror. Showing that Clinton was successful in stopping Al Queda in 2000 and throughout all 8 years of his presidency is a huge huge blow to Bush's credibility.

Debunking the "Clinton did nothing about terror." myth would be a huge win for us all.

I've been collecting stuff on this for a bit, Will's article caught my eye with its exerpt from clintons speech.

TearForger

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. To expand on what you said
Bush's ONLY strength is the war on terror. That's all he has.

And if the truth were known about his half-assed attempt at counter-terrorism, his "war on terror" would bring about his impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gosh! He even remembered
us Canadians...what's up with that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nice
I read it wrong at first, thinking it was a recent Bush speech. It simply wasn't making sense as I scanned. When I got to the word Forensic I knew that I was in error.

Great find, Will. Too bad 43 didn't bother to follow up on Clinton's early work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. LoL Me too
I was thinking, "When did Bush start to make sense?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. free agents looking to make a profit on weapons of mass destruction
Sounds like Bush is talking about his own military industrial junta.


You should understand that the same process of miniaturization
will find its way into the development of biological and chemical, and maybe even nuclear weapons. And it is something we have to be ready for.


. . . so a year later we get his proposal for new-generation mini-nukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. I miss having a President
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good looking out, Will
Need to forward this to my Republican friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. it would be great to have a president again
after 2004.

sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC