Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"World simply can't afford an American government this bad" for 3 years.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:33 AM
Original message
"World simply can't afford an American government this bad" for 3 years.
NY Times editorial:

President Bush's Walkabout


Published: November 8, 2005
After President Bush's disastrous visit to Latin America, it's unnerving to realize that his presidency still has more than three years to run. An administration with no agenda and no competence would be hard enough to live with on the domestic front. But the rest of the world simply can't afford an American government this bad for that long.

In Argentina, Mr. Bush, who prides himself on his ability to relate to world leaders face to face, could barely summon the energy to chat with the 33 other leaders there, almost all of whom would be considered friendly to the United States under normal circumstances. He and his delegation failed to get even a minimally face-saving outcome at the collapsed trade talks and allowed a loudmouthed opportunist like the president of Venezuela to steal the show.

It's amazing to remember that when Mr. Bush first ran for president, he bragged about his understanding of Latin America, his ability to speak Spanish and his friendship with Mexico. But he also made fun of Al Gore for believing that nation-building was a job for the United States military.

The White House is in an uproar over the future of Karl Rove, the president's political adviser, and spinning off rumors that some top cabinet members may be asked to walk the plank. Mr. Bush could certainly afford to replace some of his top advisers. But the central problem is not Karl Rove or Treasury Secretary John Snow or even Donald Rumsfeld, the defense secretary. It is President Bush himself....

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/08/opinion/08tue1.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, yeah, he's gonna keep Cheney in check! Addington in charge.
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 12:39 AM by Carolab
Cheney just walks all over Bush. And now he has Addington replacing Libby, Mr. Torture's Mr. Torture himself.

At least Rove was probably some kind of a buffer, inasmuch as it appears his loyalty was more to Chimpy than to Cheney.

There is an infight going on between the puppet and the master.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. At least the NYT has finally grown a pair
It's a good editorial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Don't kid yourself... the NYT is floundering around trying to ...
find some rock to cling to while Bu$hitCo, the Repukes and this War they were a cheap whore for implodes all around them.

The Times has many changes to still make, including firing Judith Miller instead of buttering her ass, and putting their liberal Columnist back into the mainstream (as the WSJ does), rather than behind the wall of "Times Select".

I learn more from DU and Buzzflash than anything in the NYT.

Frankly, the "Paper of Record" is simply a broken record these days. If it survives the next several years, I will be amazed. If it doesn't, then good riddance. Let a real news organization take its place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. Addington is a Nightmare's Nightmare..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I cannot afford 3 more years of Chumpy and his evil cohorts. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nor can I! Every day these Greed Pigs remain in power, threatens us
all. Well the majority of us that is. And the World population at large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. The central problem is B* himself. So True. The entire world is
suffering because of this idiot. The SCOTUS 2000 decision was bad enough on constitutionality, but their decision makes them as irresponsible and immoral as the M$M in their support of the BFEE.

:kick: and Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. He is a problem, but I think the PNAC CROWD is the real problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bark Bark Bark Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. The Killer Misconception
...is that George Dubya Bush is running the show. Let's wake up. Bush didn't pick Cheney, or any other member of the administration. Cheney and his cabal picked Bush, because none of them could get elected as POTUS and because they know Americans easily mistake smarm for charm.

Cheney forms a committee to find Dubbie a running mate--then offers himself as the best choice? C'mon. Li'l Dubbie needs a speaker hidden under his jacket to get through a press conference. Do you think they let him play with the red phone?

After 9-11, Cheney went into hiding while Bush ran around in the open, flapping his arms and baying like a hound. That alone tells us who's really in charge...and who's the decoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldlady Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. If ONLY
Bush would take this ethics "refresher" seriously and be convicted by his "conscience" to create a transparent government. Release those Energy Commission Meeting minutes, GW...c'mon, let the housecleaning begin! (dreams aren't illegal are they?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. If he took the ethics refresher course and did the ethical thing...
he'd resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. you would have to have a conscience to be guided by it, sadly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, what a change of heart for the NYT. Did they fire Judy? n/t
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 12:46 AM by tuvor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. No, just schizophrenic
It all depends on whose writing the stories that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. I think Judas in on a mighty tight leash right now..........
she has no business being there at all, but there's something going on behind the scenes that we're not privy to. Maybe Judas herself is CIA? Who knows?

I don't think we'll be seeing a lot of important stories from the desk of Judas Miller in the future. Maybe she can head the birthday party and bar mitzvahs desk now, there's a real need for solid reporting there and Judas is just the one that can handle the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Like the title, but I question the accuracy of & intent behind the text--
I question whether it's fair to scorn Chavez as a "loud-mouth opportunist", and although Bush himself is a problem, I don't believe he controls much. Those in control are those who backed him; and they're already selecting the next figurehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good points.
But Bush is a big problem. If Cheney and Rove are forced out--gods willing--then Bush is left.

I suppose they can cruise for three years without hitting too many rocks and shoals along the way. Unless Bush really doesn believe he was sent by God...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. what is amazing is the NYT's suddenly trying to pretend to be a legit
newspaper. "loud-mouthed opportunist" from venezuela, however, does not convey quite the right image for them.

nor does going along with the fiction that chimpboy had ANY understanding of latin american politics--he didn't even know where most of these countries were. and his attempts to speak spanish were pitiful.

the only thing they got right is that the world can't take 3 more years of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. They let Nagourney tear down Gore and Kerry while drooling over Bush in
both 2000 and 2004, and now they want to pretend they are worried?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Aren't they cute? They've made themselves unreadable and then wonder why
no one is reading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
55. I haven't forgotten
The NYT can kiss my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. But he's going to send Karen Hughes & Condi out there again
Maybe he'll send Harriet Miers out there with them. They have all been so successful.

George W, the president who never was and should have never been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. World Can't Wait nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just posted this on the Alzheimer thread
Libby will be gone, Rove will be indicted and resign all indications are Chaney has had it and will leave after 2006.....What will happen then? Can he survive until the next election w/o all his cronies?

The country/world is in turmoil. All we need is a real outbreak of bird flu and we are all gone

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Please. Don't give them any ideas. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. We couldn't afford the first 5, but we got them anyway.
And the NYT along with the rest of the media is itself partly to blame for many of these problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wow! They want him to ditch Cheney!



The place to begin is with Dick Cheney, the dark force behind many of the administration's most disastrous policies, like the Iraq invasion and the stubborn resistance to energy conservation. Right now, the vice president is devoting himself to beating back Congressional legislation that would prohibit the torture of prisoners. This is truly a remarkable set of priorities: his former chief aide was indicted, Mr. Cheney's back is against the wall, and he's declared war on the Geneva Conventions.

Mr. Bush cannot fire Mr. Cheney, but he could do what other presidents have done to vice presidents: keep him too busy attending funerals and acting as the chairman of studies to do more harm. Mr. Bush would still have to turn his administration around, but it would at least send a signal to the nation and the world that he was in charge, and the next three years might not be as dreadful as they threaten to be right now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Why the HELL can't Bush fire Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. Cheney can't be fired because he is elected.
The only way to get rid of him is through resignation or impeachment.

The only thing Bush can do to expedite Cheney's resignation is to expose him and his crimes. Cheney is so evil, however, that he'll retaliate and bring down Bush along with him... so they're stuck with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Why can't he fire Cheney?
He can ditch the Geneva conventions and the ABM treaty, but he can't fire Cheney? He can pee on the Bill of Rights and detain anyone he wants to indefinitely without charging him, but he can't fire Cheney? What kind of wuss is he, anyway?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Because he's an ELECTED official.
He can no more fire Cheney than he can Rep. Pelosi. or Sen. Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. He can "resign" Cheney.
As Nixon resigned Agnew. And he would "resign" Cheney if Cheney's baggage became too heavy for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. NYT is seeing the light? Nonetheless, impeach Cheney first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Cheney is at the heart of all of our current problems.
(I use the term "heart" ironically.) Cheney is a foul, vile criminal with no interest at all in America or Americans. The terrorists attacked us once. Dick attacks us every day. Impeachment is way, way too good for this monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bush speaks Spanish? When will he learn English?
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. That dipshit doesn't speak Spanish any more than I speak Mandarin
Chinese.

Back when he was campaigning for gov of Texas and then president in 2000, they taught him a few phrases to use in speeches and he'd mangle them every time. It was too sad to even be funny.

I'd stake BIG money on him not being able to speak Spanish, that's how sure of I am. He's not even fluent in his first language, as you pointed out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
53. I hope is Spanish is more fluent than his English. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah, tryin to show some cojones
with these anti puff pieces on bush.. how hard is it to kick the asshole when he's DOWN? Classic..

BUSH TELLING CHENEY to go to Funerals/Studies? Are these guys on MARS? If Cheney isn't the real President then ROVE IS..

If you kicked Bush in the ass you'd break Cheney's arm..

"Loud mouthed President of Venezulela"? Oh, you mean that EVIL Socialist who uses HIS oil money to HELP HIS PEOPLE? THe one that BUSH has tried to pull a Coup on TWICE, if not more?

The one that sent I think a MILLION barrels of OIL after NO was hit?

THAT "loudmouth"? I'd prefer HIM over Bush ANY day of the Week.. HE is a REAL MAN, gutsy, a LEADER..

Bush is some kind of stuffed toy where the stiching is pulling out and all of a sudden you realise the toy isn't filled with cotton, it's filled with Excrement - and Cheney or Rove's HAND of course.

3 years of a guy where we've had nothing but ONE Disaster after another WHILE he's surrounded by his DREAM TEAM - and it was all about, "Gee, don't worry that he's retarded or chews with his mouth open or mocks people he's going to execute - he'll have the best team in the world telling him what to do, why Cheney chose the Best of ALL the VEEP Candidates - HIMSELF" Don't forget that Cheney got Dossiers on EVERYONE picked for VEEP FIRST.

Frankly I'm scared shitless. I truely believe that if it wasn't MIHOP or LIHOP and just a simple terror attack because they sensed an IDIOT WAS IN CHARGE of the US, what the hell are they going to DO TO US when the IDIOT IS HELPLESS?

THIS is Bad JOO JOO friends.

All that talk about a "Constitutional Crisis" IF Bush wasn't MADE President? Guess what, we have one RIGHT NOW.

The NYTIMES CAN STILL GO FUCK THEMSELVES - you are NOT going to REDEEM yourselves when you were/are nothing but a STOVEPIPE for the most hateful, evil corporatist Fascists we've seen since Mussolini..

GET OUT NYT and STAY OUT - you've shit the bed and WE do NOT TRUST YOU, and Never WILL.. only if you tied Judas Miller to a big piece of wood and Burned her at the Stake in front of your offices would I consider it to be something close to an apology..

But that's just me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Like he said_____nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. What happened to the "Charm offensive?" Remember the Republicans said tha
that about Bush - before he became Prez. He might be able to charm on a short-term basis, but basically he can't get along with people. Thus, his "loyalty" - he surrounds himself by people that at least pretend to like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. snake-charmer, maybe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. Works for me: I've always found his "charm" offensive nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. Has the NYT finally gotten its priorities in order?
Maybe if they hadn't spent so much time dissecting Al Gore's "makeover" or Bill Clinton's personal life and instead focused on the very grave threat the current neocon regime posed to this nation and the world, there might not be a need for editorials like this.

I'll give the Times credit, overall the editorial is a good one. But this is a hollow victory because our "paper of record" is part of the reason why we are in this perious position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. It only took them 5 years to figure this out! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. This suggests a poll question
I've been wanting to see:

"Is the Bush Administration so damaged now that it can no longer govern effectively?"

To which we on DU would answer a resounding, "Well Duh!".

But I'd like to know how the general public would respond.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. If this is Conservatism's "finest hour" I'd say they're limping to the
finish line. A more pathetic display of incompetence, arrogance, deserves a day to honor such a poor performance, don't you think ? Hip hip, fttttttttttttttttt, hip hip ftttttttttttttt !

Bronx cheers all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. They waited decades for all the pieces to fall into place.....
the planning, the plotting, getting the voting machines changed and in their control. They finally did it, the Senate, House of Representatives, the White House and for all intents and purposes the Supreme Court as well, all in their control. And THIS is the best they can do? :wtf: If this is their best effort when everything is controlled by them then they are some PRETTY SHITTY administrators!

Hopefully they've hit their high water mark and now the country will return to sanity. An educated populace would never vote for a Conservative again, but we don't have an educated populace....due to the Conservatives, of course. A dumb electorate is their friend, their ace in the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #45
57. Something like 40% of eligible voters are soooo discouraged, don't vote
given up or are forced to not vote as in the shenanigans in OH, with long lines in Dem majority areas...or FL with Greg Palast's documented black voter discouragement/purge.

We need a huge absentee voter registration by mail along with more 'in the streets' actions starting heavily two months prior to any elections. You saw the R's driving their voters to the polls perhaps ? I sure took note of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. More BS, disguised as sage advice, from the NYT.
Why would anyone think this is valid advice? If one reads the article carefully, one smells the BS. As for Chavez, Go Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. Hear, hear.
Too little, too late, NYT. I mean WTF? bush et al DON'T GIVE A SHIT.

Never have, never will. And that will get more and more obvious as time goes on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. The central problem is the RW and it's vast amounts of money
They can buy all the enabling they need.

turdweasel needs to go, but so do all the RW Conservative manipulators and their media stooges. The lies of RW pundits and the favoritism of "news' needs to be exposed right along with the exposure of the administration. Also, the ties betwn the admin. and Conservative Christian crusaders.

We need an honest media, a respect for knowledge and a public that knows the difference between ideology and information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. What's wrong with letting a loud-mouthed opportunist from VZL talk?
He had something interesting to say.

I do agree though...3 more years of this guy, hell, 3 more months, is just too much to bear. For me, for anyone, or for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. There's not a snowball's chance in hell......
of bush even talking brusquely to Cheney, he knows who wears the pants in that administration. Cheney would rip his head off and piss down his neck. However, Cheney must go. Shit, this entire administration must go.
As for our Dim-wit in Chief, he has a history of quitting everything he's ever attempted as soon as the going starts getting a little rough. He's not a finisher and I'm willing to bet that right at this moment he wishes they hadn't stolen the vote last November. I'm sure he'd like to walk away right now, as he always has, but gosh darn it the American public have some hair-brained idea that a president should serve out his term. We, as the American public, must give the Nit-wit in Chief his "out" here. If we started impeachment proceedings he'd probably resign in a heartbeat. I'm sure he'd much rather be clearing brush that doing all if this "presidentin'". Presidentin' is hard work and bush isn't a nuts and bolts guy. He's a chainsaw guy. Let's commence with our efforts to send him back to the Pig Farm, ASAP. I'm almost certain we'd get no argument from him. There's nobody rushing to bail his ass out of this one, he's made his bead and has to sleep in it. For once in his life the Saudis, Daddy, or Daddy's friends can't bail him out of a jam. He's going to have to suck it up and take it, and that's not his style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. I don't think the New York Times understands, so I'll
type this out slowly (LOL):

BUSH ET AL DON'T CARE.

There. They had to hide it a BIT during his first administration (but not much).

This one? Pshaw. By 2008 they'll be actually pissing on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
49. Bush doesn't have the stones to face down Cheney
Mr. Bush cannot fire Mr. Cheney, but he could do what other presidents have done to vice presidents: keep him too busy attending funerals and acting as the chairman of studies to do more harm. Mr. Bush would still have to turn his administration around, but it would at least send a signal to the nation and the world that he was in charge, and the next three years might not be as dreadful as they threaten to be right now.


At the rate things are going now, though, Cheney may be attending his own funeral soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
50. As that famous, moronic Republican Bruce Willis....
...might tell the NY Times, "Welcome to the party, pal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makeanoise Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
54. Scandals are cool because....
Media will actually only do this sort of investigative and attack reporting when scandals are in the air...then can get some stories out...

That's the way it works I think, let's just hope this scandal stays around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC