Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: How Bush sold the war on Iraq to american people. (MUST READ!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:50 PM
Original message
MSNBC: How Bush sold the war on Iraq to american people. (MUST READ!)
I dont know how many of you caught Hardball this evening, but this story and it's timeline were extremely impactful how Bush and his top administration B.S.'d and LIED it's way to selling the war.

As much as I dislike Chris Matthews sometimes, his show was a HUGE blow to Bush tonight.

The follow up interview with Dem. Senator Levin (D-Mich) which he read from this weekends declassified memo regarding the pre-war intelligence makes it crystal clear we were mislead and lied to.

PLEASE PLEASE READ:

Snip from article:

Unbeknownst to the public at the time, however, two agencies in the administration, the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the Department of Energy, concluded the aluminum tubes were the wrong specification for nuclear materials.

Agency officials, under orders not to talk publicly, thought the tubes were intended to be Iraqi artillery rockets, not nukes. In early January 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported, “While it would be possible to modify such tubes for the manufacture of centrifuges, they are not directly suitable for it.”

The Bush administration dismissed the IAEA report and in the president’s State of the Union, the ultimate platform for the administration to sell the idea that Saddam was a nuclear threat.

“The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapon production,” said Bush.

The first sentence was retracted six months later, following criticism from Ambassador Joe Wilson. In turn, that led to White House actions against Wilson and his CIA wife, that evolved into a criminal investigation into White House leaks.

But the investigation was not in time to stop White House operatives from executing what had already been a masterful and successful marketing of what State Department official Richard Haass called at the time, “a war of choice.”

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9962149/

It's time to IMPEACH him NOW! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The tide is turning
Bush is going to be swept away by a tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah! Impeach the FraWdmeister!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If we can't impeach bush** over this, something is seriously wrong
in America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed. This is such utter bullshit! 2000 soldiers are dead. And for what?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. And for what? Oil power and pure unadulterated greed!
That's pretty much it. Oh and according to the bush baby, "Saddam tried to kill my Daddy." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Don't forget "securing the realm" (Israel).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't know much about that subject and I tend to stay of out those
discussions since I am not up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. page from the PNAC bible
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 12:46 AM by arewenotdemo
>>>In 1996, Douglas Feith (the recent director of the Office of Special Plans) and Richard Perle - now an influential Pentagon figure - served as advisers to the then Likud leader, Binyamin Netanyahu. In a policy paper they wrote, entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, the two advisers said that Saddam would have to be destroyed, and Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Iran would have to be overthrown or destabilised, for Israel to be truly safe.<<<

http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4714031-103681,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. And also go and watch
the film "The War Party" at http://www.informationclearinghouse.info It really opens up about the whole pro-Israel ordeal with the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. oh, I think an intern's blowjob is a greater National Security emergency
really, what is all the fuss about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You forgot this,
:sarcasm: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. I got my ass flamed earlier for recommending tonight's show!
I thought it was GREAT- especially the 2nd half.

Please post link if (and when) available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I only saw the last 5 minutes (awaiting KO) and I was appalled how Tweety
was saying that not only the * administration, Republicans in congress, Dems who went along, and the media where partially to blame, but also the American people.

I guess since they had access to the same info that we who protested the war even then did, the sheeple deserve some of the blame as well, HOWEVER, this to me sounds like an attempt to dilute blame and apply guilt to the public so they will be willing to more readily forgive since they are somewhat guilty as well. I say nail those complict's sorry asses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. it's sick that the WH is saying the dems are just as guilty bec they voted
for war. Where's the comparison between intentionally twisting evidence and falling for that twisted evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. the last 5 mins were sucky, unfortunately
the reporting on the marketing of Iraq (outstanding, as the original post notes) was at the halfway mark.

I agree with what you said- blaming Americans who were traumatized by the "TERRA TERRA TERRA" Administration in a post 9-11 world, and the unquestioning, sycophantic corporate-sponsored media echo chamber who never asked questions and gave the anti-war movement VERY short shrift, didn't really give the public a fair shake. The MSM legitimized and validated the B*sh scam and served it up for public consumption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. Thinking of scene from Animal House...
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 11:12 AM by mark11727

Otter: ..you can't spend your whole life worrying about your mistakes! You fucked up - you trusted us! Hey, make the best of it! Maybe we can help.

...

Flounder: Will that work?

Otter: Hey, it's gotta work better than the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. When the Tweety Turns
You know good things may really happen this time. I was amazed. What next - Wolfie? Naw....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not only that, but the tubes were ordered to be coated with a chemical
Edited on Mon Nov-07-05 10:20 PM by jsamuel
that is used specifically for regular rockets. That same chemical would hurt any attempts to make nuclear weapons (uranium and that chemical don't mix). It would be a job all in itself just to get the chemical off of the tubes.

This is from a NYT article pre-election 2004.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?oref=regi

First, in size and material, the tubes were very different from those Iraq had used in its centrifuge prototypes before the first gulf war. Those models used tubes that were nearly twice as wide and made of exotic materials that performed far better than aluminum. "Aluminum was a huge step backwards," Dr. Wood recalled.

In fact, the team could find no centrifuge machines "deployed in a production environment" that used such narrow tubes. Their walls were three times too thick for "favorable use" in a centrifuge, the team wrote. They were also anodized, meaning they had a special coating to protect them from weather. Anodized tubes, the team pointed out, are "not consistent" with a uranium centrifuge because the coating can produce bad reactions with uranium gas.

In other words, if Joe and his Winpac colleagues were right, it meant that Iraq had chosen to forsake years of promising centrifuge work and instead start from scratch, with inferior material built to less-than-optimal dimensions.

The Energy Department experts did not think that made much sense. They concluded that using the tubes in centrifuges "is credible but unlikely, and a rocket production is the much more likely end use for these tubes." Similar conclusions were being reached by Britain's intelligence service and experts at the International Atomic Energy Agency, a United Nations body.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Americans smart enough to avoid Syrianam?
NeoCons still are on the prowl with the growing knowledge of the extent of the war profiteering (rip off) by BR&K and what does BushCo do? Bolton comes out squealing about he huge Food for Oil program scandal (even though many U.S. companies involved) to distract. These guys are an endless pit of treachery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. "sold" like a used car salesman
Edited on Mon Nov-07-05 11:06 PM by proud patriot
bush = used car salesman

and I'm not buying it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Amazing, isn't it? Many of us knew better.
I am almost as floored by the lack of critical thought from the MSM and American people as I am by the corruption and hatefulness of the Bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Is there a Tweety repeat, and if so, what time?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. 3 a.m. on MSNBC
My satellite, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thank you! Is that eastern time?
?

I'm in the Mountain time zone, so I want to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I am using 3 a.m. EST, yes. So it would be 1 a.m. your time, I think? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. In the WH evils lives, real evil !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. A war of choice, conquest and profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. don't forget to rate the Shuster article
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9962149


now at 4.5 with 147 votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
26. the shrubby sob needs to be in prison
and all those who surround him. This administration is commiting acts of criminal intent, has been.
:grr: :grr: :grr:

IMPEACH SHRUB NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. Iraq War
Ya! Now they tell. I am sick of these guys coming out of woodwork with these stories of lies and fraud. It would have been obvious to anyone with normal intelligence and common sense to conclude that Saddam could not have had any WMD because of the sanctions, bombings and inspections over a 10-year period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. Democrats need to press this and other issues harder
When the republicans are down like this, kick them until you hear ribs breaking, step on their necks until you hear bones crunch. Just think of what the republicans would be doing to you if:

  • Two of your high administration officials were being investigated for leaking classifified information leading to the exposure of an undercover CIA agent

  • One of those officials was under multiple indictments and the other waiting to be.

  • Your House majority leader was under indictment and the Senate leader investigated for insider trading

  • It was becoming manifestly apparent that your President, Vice President, and Secretary of State had lied to you and your constituents to promote a war that never should have been fought. Over 100,000 Iraqis and over 2000 Americans have died, in addition to many thousands wounded, with no end in sight for the carnage.

  • The largest natural disaster in this country has exposed rank cronyism and corruption in the agencies tasked to deal with national emergencies, such as a massive terrorist attack.


And that's just a partial list of the woe republicans, who always place party over country, have visited on this country. We need a purge in the next two elections. It's not going to be enough to just defeat them at the polls, if we're able to do that, but they need to be driven into the wilderness (or a federal prison, if appropriate) so that they never again have the chance to use the mechanisms of democracy to seize power and destroy our country. Hearings, trials, convictions, shame. The very word "republican" an obscenity, like "nazi".

Kick, crunch. Step, crunch. It's what they've been doing to you, and what you can continue to expect if you're not willing to fight back. And if you won't fight for us, we'll have to try to find people who will. Just keep thinking, What Would Karl Do? THEN DO IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Another Two!
Now would be the time to remind people that, in fact, 9/11 happened on his watch. So the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history occurred and the PDB should become an issue again.

Also, a simple one. "Where's Osama?"
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. "Unbeknownst to the public at the time"
Should read

"Unbeknownst to the sheeple at the time"

The MSM needs to be impeached right along with Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Bingo! I knew the facts - not thanks to MSNBC&comp
They were active accomplices in this and all BFEE crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
33. It's only a matter of time
The truth is coming out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm surprised he gave them any time at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC