Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it fair to say that Harriet Meirs was at least as qualified as O'Connor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:17 PM
Original message
Is it fair to say that Harriet Meirs was at least as qualified as O'Connor
for the job of Supreme Court Justice? Any other justices on the court have even less experience than she did or about the same?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. No
O'Connor had been elected to the Court in Arizona (I believe it was the Arizona State Supreme Court). She had judicial experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:23 PM
Original message
Ahhh what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2.  no
First, O'Connor graduated from Stanford Law School and was on its Law Review. I think she graduated number 2 in her class, right behind Rehnquist. Meirs did not have these academic credentials.
Second, O'Connor had served on a mid-level appellate court in Arizona prior to being nominated to the Sup. Ct.
Third, O'Connor graduated from law school about 15-20 years before Meirs and encountered much more sexism. In fact, after she graduated from Stanford as no. 2 in her class, no one would hire her as a lawyer. O'Connor went very far despite the deep institutional sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tony_Illinois Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I Think It Is Fair To Say
she was a train wreck. Really she was no more qualified than Ann Coulter. . . Wouldn't that be grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I guess I was hoping to make more of a case for her not being
Conservative enough, and that's why the Conservatives derailed her. But both sides seem to agree that she was not qualified, even though our side is trying to sell it as the extreme right wing's doing.

I thought I'd read some pundit somewhere say that Meirs was about as qualified as she needed to be, and so the Conservatives had just hung themselves and could no longer whine about Bork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tony_Illinois Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My Understanding
of the Conservative response to her was that she was not, in fact, demonstratively Conservative enough for them. Although she was known to be an evangelical Christian and reliably conservative in her political and social views, the fact that she had not been a judge hurt her candidacy. For this critical seat on the court, the Conservatives want a "sure thing". No guessing or taking chances about what kind of a judge they might get.

Because Judge Alito has a 15-year record on the bench, Conservatives are more comfortable in their belief that he will vote as he has on the Appeals Court. And additionally, he is expected to be the type of judge to sway opinion on the court rather than just take a position and defend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. She was a subterfuge.
Edited on Tue Nov-01-05 09:57 PM by Xap
Nominating a woman or minority perceived to be unqualified allows them to say "well, we tried" and clears the way for another white male. Of course it was they who also created that perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Do you think pretending that the Dems are attacking him for being Italian
is part of pretending that he's some kind of minority. As if Italians are still discrimiated against?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC