So, would it be possible for the Dems to "run out the clock" on SC noms?

[Craig3410]

Like, could the Democrats simply filibuster every nominee that * nominates until after the '06 elections?

Also, what does the SC do with cases when they only have 7 or 8 judges on the court?

[Wilms]

1. Or until * resigns (if that comes first). n/t

:evilgrin:

[gademocrat7]

2. They could use parliamentary procedures

like the one implemented today.

[gumby]

3. The Repubs have said they will nuke the filibuster

if the Dems try it; known as "the nuclear option."

Don't think the Constitution mentions a number for the SC.

[strategery blunder]

4. Regarding your second question

The SCOTUS can decide cases with one or more justices not voting, so it does not need all nine justices to function.

In the event of a tie (say, 4-4 decision), the lower court decision stands.

Edit: The Constitution does not mention a certain number of justices the SCOTUS must have. FDR tried to increase the number of justices to 15, but the Congress scuttled the proposal.