Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: The Best Way to Keep Social Security Solvent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:21 PM
Original message
Poll question: Poll: The Best Way to Keep Social Security Solvent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. other: divert money from defense for social security
dont cut other social programs to fun it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll vote for that option!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. beat me to it.
cutting the defense budget say, in half, would adequately fund it for decades, i would think. probably be plenty left over for universal health care and free post secondary education too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Repeal the Tax cuts...
Nothing would make Social Security solvent, but paying off a good bit of the national debt could have better prepared us for the deficit spending to come. Instead, they just looted the place BEFORE the crisis hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I support raising the retirement age
The retirement age is already scheduled to increase from 65 to 67, but even that doesn't fully account for the increase in life expectancy since social security was first implemented.

The fact is, new retirees can expect to receive social security benefits for a longer period of time than previous generations of social security recipients. I simply don't see why new retirees are more deserving than previous generations of recipients, who fought two world wars and had to endure the Great Depression. Other than Vietnam War veterans (for whom I'd be willing to make an exception) can we honestly say that retiring baby boomers have had to make the great sacrifices made by previous generations? I don't think so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not fair to people who do manual labor
If you, say, work for a moving company, you're not going to want to be loading trucks much past 65.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Raising the Cap - it's a no-brainer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps the dedicated payroll flat tax is itself a lousy idea?
And the cap on the tax, intended to limit lifetime benefits, just turns it into an even more regressive burden. I guess it's necessary to disguise the fund as an investment in government bonds, and it theoretically keeps the money safe from being discretionaried into oblivion, but there are more efficient and fair ways to handle welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. The long-term solution is raising taxrate.
In the short run eliminating the cap will only delay the problem, but it will be necessary. But as in the 80's when the program was expected to go bust, raising the tax rate..just a little will bring huge surpluses back into the trust fund. This is a fairer solution than means-testing a program which may no longer have an income cap on the FICA tax, and it would be much better than again raising the retirement age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC