Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitz can't get at the underlying crime *because* Libby is lying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:13 PM
Original message
Fitz can't get at the underlying crime *because* Libby is lying
and obstructing.

Fitz said as much at the press conference.

If someone is lying and obstructing, then the investigators are prevented from figuring out what happened in the crime itself.

That's why perjury and obstructing are serious charges, because they thwart the investigation of the underlying crime.

The media is making it seem like there was no underlying crime. That's nonsense. Fitz just couldn't get to it *because* of Libby's lying and obstructing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No shit it is not over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. A lot of us seem to be forgetting that, and need to be reminded.
So I'm nominating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bingo! This should be the Dem's talking points
It's simple, short and easy to understand! We should e-mail this to Howard Dean and a shit load of Dem's.

Please nominate this! Word needs to get around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. The media is stupid, when it's not full of shit
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:27 PM by OldLeftieLawyer
It's hard to know when it's one or the other.

Pay no attention to the media. Just wait for the next pronouncement from Fitzgerald - if there is one - because that's the only legitimate source of information.

In the meantime, enjoy Libby's arraignment on Thursday.

You know what that means, don't you?

That's right.

MUG SHOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Mmmmmm. Mugshot goodness.
I just wish SOMEone in the press would point out that the lying and obstructing is what may be keeping Fitz from bringing a case for the underlying crime.

*sigh* I over-expect.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, Rovian Blood Lust can be a powerful virus
But, what you do have to keep in mind is that the underlying law that Fitzgerald is charged with investigating is very, very badly drafted, and, consequently, very, very hard to prove.

I've never thought that anyone would be charged with outing Plame. Not what people want to hear, but it's a really impossible law.

But, you're right that this Libby indictment is simply a detour on the road towards the conclusion of the investigation. Libby (I keep wanting to type "Liddy," but that's just nostalgia on my part) was the roadblock, and now what he does is what determines how the rest of the investigation progresses.

Will he make a deal and testify against his pals in the White House?

Will he go to trial?

Will he get a Presidential pardon before either of those things happen?

My bet is on the pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. NOT just Libby but EVERYONE is lying!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shamrock Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Fitzgerald will
get to the bottom of it. Wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is an important point and it is not being made often enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree, see my post above
This needs to be the Dem's talking point as pulls the rug right out from under the Rights talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fitz described it as having "sand kicked in my face"
It obscures the facts about the crime, making it impossible to see what happened. I also heard Lindsey Graham on the radio yesterday, he said something interesting.... he thought Fitzgerald was keeping a Grand Jury open in case something important gets said during Libby's trial that implicates somebody else.

I hadn't thought about it that way, but duh... During the trial, Cheney, Rove, etc. could all get called to testify publicly. So we should hear some very interesting questions and answers, right?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. If there's a trial, I'll contribute $25 to DU - If there's not, will you?
There ain't no way Cheney, Rove, Rice, Hadley, Bolton, and Tenet will be allowed to testify under oath on Court TV. It'd make the OJ Trial look like Traffic Court.

No way. No how. Scooter's going down unless he sings like 12 fat ladies.

If he sings, his wife and kids will have a tragic accident - and Scooter will commit suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head with a deer rifle.

Scooter's going down. I'm betting he eventually pleas nolo contendre -- he won't even plea guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. I think I'd lose the bet...
You are probably correct that there ain't gonna be no big revelations during Scooter's trial.

These characters under oath in public being asked embarassing questions is just too much to hope for.

Scooter will most likely admit guilt and call it a day. While he's at it, he'll probably claim credit for some thing he didn't do, just to get others off the hook. An Ollie North type "hero".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Exactly... apparently the talking heads weren't listening
I heard that plain and simple.. yet to hear the MSM tell the story "Libby did not out a CIA agent because that is not what he is charged with"....

But what do you expect, they have the comprehension of a gaggle of 6 year olds.... *grrrrrr

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I just sent this link to the Ed Schultz show
We should all let every Air America show in on this talking point. Dem's need to be saying this in unison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks.
I'm a Big Eddie fan.

Sometimes the main points of what Fitz said get bogged down by the idiot cable-tv pundits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are too "scripted" to actually fuckin' LISTEN!!!!
I'm sorry,...but, it's true. I wish we could toss all the airheaded pundits and "experts" out on their arses.

Obstructing justice IS covering up or diverting from committed crimes. Moreover, Libby is definitely not the only one engaging in such behavior. He's just the only one securely pinned to the wall AT THIS TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ding, ding, ding! Winner!
That's it exactly. When no one is telling the truth, or you can't get two true statements in a row, you indict for lying to the FBI, lying to the grand jury and obstruction of justice.

We'll see if the prospect of spending some time in jail daunts Scooter or not. If not, if he keeps lying and doesn't budge off his story, he'll go to jail for a while, but the investigation could well be over. But if Scooter doesn't feel like taking the whole fall all by himself, he just might begin remembering the truth about this whole affair.

But if he is the only one Fitzgerald gets, I don't think the judge is going to be inclined to leniency. Keep in mind that Fitzgerald has already presented evidence to a judge, who ordered subpoenas for reporters, something that is used in only the most extraordinary circumstances. Judges don't like to be lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. this is a really simple and wonderful point --
for everyone flailing about "just one indictment" LOOK HERE. he's got to put the pressure on where it belongs. remember how long it took in the pokey to get miller to talk...and that was only after libby absolved her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. And Bush knew who committed the crime
Either they have been lying to him and he doesn't care; or he's been lying to us. There is no wiggling out of that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. 20-30 years in jail to protect CON bosses.
Well, maybe that beats the death penalty for treason during time of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I heard a guy on Rita Cosby
say he's looking at three to three and a half. They must have drugs in the green room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. A Defense Attorney's very interesting post
on Daily Kos suggests 24-30 months for the current charges, longer if he is later charged with revealing a covert agent's identity

"Since Libby has no criminal history. He's at level I. The sentencing table puts Level 17, Criminal History I at 24-30 months."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/10/31/124027/48
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I hope Libby decides to tell the truth eventually
and cut a last-minute deal with Fitz.

Or maybe he'll go to jail for a couple of years to protect Cheney. I hope not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC