Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

did I miss it????? did Fitz empanel a 2nd grand jury??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:13 PM
Original message
did I miss it????? did Fitz empanel a 2nd grand jury??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No.
He will use an existing one if necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is there a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Prefer the existing one.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 09:19 PM by The Backlash Cometh
I don't remember how the Voir Dire works with Grand Juries, but that's where the manipulation can occur from the heavily lawyered Bush ranks. Not that they would have input INSIDE the court, but perhaps could use the media as a bully pulpit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The existing one is no longer in session -- its term has expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Grand juries are selected randomly. They don't use voir dire! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thank you!!! That is what I heard too. But everyone seems to think
there are seald indictments and new GJ panels.

WTF do some people live on MARZ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fitz doesn't need to empanel anything at this point.
He can just use a pre-empaneled jury that's on call since most of the testifying and all that's done. (i.e. there's huge amounts of pre-existing evidence that can simply be read rather than starting from scratch)

So this sounds like a misconception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that's the part i don't understand...
a pre-existing grand jury? i thought they were empaneled for specific reasons. are there gj's out there just waiting to be assigned something? can you redirect a grand jury that is investigating white colllar crime to heart evidence like plame-gate?

if anyone out there can explain, please do...

whalrider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Grand juries are required, under the Constitution, for all felony ...
... indictments. Thus, there's a general grand jury empaneled in every Federal District at all times. The question of whether to empanel a Special Grand Jury, specifically chartered for complex and extended cases, is up to the District Court, I believe.

Grand juries make two determinations: (1) that a crime actually occurred and (2) that there's probable cause to indict a person for the commission of that crime. (Probable cause is a charging standard, far lower than beyond a reasonable doubt required for guilt.)

Disclaimer: IANAL ... This is only what I understand from researching the background on CIA/Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. thanks so much.. this had puzzled me too.
I also thought that they were empaneled for a particular case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Large municipalities probably have GJs in session at all times..
I served as a Grand Juror for NYS Supreme Court several years ago.
New GJs were empaneled at the beginning of each month. There were 7 or 8 of them selected in the month that I served. (More crime at the time.) I'm not certain how a specific case goes to a specific GJ, altho I have the impression that it was more or less the luck of the draw.

In NYS, I believe that all felony arrests need to be indicted by a GJ for the case to go forward, unless the defendant waives the GJ and goes straight to arraignment. That's why so many GJs run at one time. (I served for a month.)

This case is in Federal Court. I don't know the specifics of how they use GJs etc but it's probably similar. I'm assuming Fitzgerald would go to whatever GJ is in service at the time he needs them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherokeeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Served on a Federal Grand Jury
I was on a Federal Grand Jury in KY for 18 months which I think is the usual length. Fitzgerald had the last GJ extended for an additional 6 mos. The GJ I was on also concurrently served as a Special Grand Jury on a specific case for 12 months. So 1-2 days a month we heard regular cases and then another 1-2 days we heard testimony on the Special Grand Jury. When our time ended, the next regular GJ served as the continuing GJ on a big case that we had started (and brought indictments) and also became the Special Grand Jury on the other matter. I think they could have empaneled two separate juries but decided not to in that case.

It was very interesting and very eye-opening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thank you CherokeeDem and welcome.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 10:08 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Can you tell us what kind of questions they asked from you before allowing you on the jury? I know there was no questions from the D.A., but did they ask you how you felt about certain legal issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC