|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 06:59 AM Original message |
Bush appointing a Supreme Court justice during a WH criminal investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. I heard that maybe 1pm on Monday there is to be a news confer. Wall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think that's a great strategy, Don |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. The majority of American people do not trust this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeanette in FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. I totally agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Im with Rosey (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. I started urging that in July. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good point. (Sandra Day O'Connor will be 115 before Bush's woes end) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zensea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'm skeptical about that working and not sure it's a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 07:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Would the same logic still apply for Clinton you ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. But they did approve Breyer... and certainly Ginsberg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:24 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. But how many were implicated in Whitewater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zensea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:26 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I know they wouldn't have allowed it, that's not the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Fitzgerald Exposed An Ongoing Criminal Enterprise Inside The White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zensea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 09:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I understand it quite well, but no crimes have been proven yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. but judges were confirmed in the midst of the Clinton investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Might be true if the majority of Americans didn't think Bush was a crook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. i think a majority questions chimpy's competence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
10. Recommended...Need one more for Greatest Page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SalmonChantedEvening (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Done and done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. Conspiricy charges would bring question to all his appointees. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
21. ANy nominee will have to publically recuse themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 04:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. If there had been no indictment yet I would say no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC