Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald's job not done yet - From a Chicago reporter who knows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:36 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald's job not done yet - From a Chicago reporter who knows
http://www.suntimes.com/output/sweet/cst-nws-sweet29.html

<snip>Fitzgerald's job not done yet


Fitzgerald said Friday his job is not quite done. President Bush's top strategist, Karl Rove, escaped charges, but it is very premature to infer that he is in the clear.

The term of the grand jury Fitzgerald has been working with expired Friday -- he spent part of the morning saying goodbye to the jurors. Fitzgerald said it will be a routine matter for him to present evidence to another grand jury.

As much as he would like to wake up each day in Chicago, Fitzgerald said: "I will not end the investigation until I can look anyone in the eye and tell them that we have carried out our responsibility sufficiently to be sure that we've done what we could to make intelligent decisions about when to end the investigation."

The usually press-shy Fitzgerald was loquacious Friday partly because the question-and-answer session at the Justice Department headquarters was a one-time special.

Before the session, Fitzgerald spokesman Randall Samborn said whatever will be said will have to serve as the final word, since his boss did not intend further comments on the indictments.

What actually does Fitzgerald know? Obviously more than he is letting on.

When will he be finished?

"All I can tell you is as soon as we can get it done, we will."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. a must read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Wow. I pray that guy knows what he is talking about......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. thanks ray of light - that was a great read!
Keeping the faith, Fitzmas day will be worth the wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yes, the indictment contained some very interesting information spotted by
others as well. Cheney and Libby knew that Wilson worked in CIA Operations where the spooks are, not Intelligence where the analysts are.

Libby mentions disclosure would result in problems with the CIA. Well that could just be the release of classified info. But would that alone cause him to mention the potential problems resulting from disclosure? Maybe, maybe not.

Libby later goes on to tell Miller that Wilson worked in WINPAC which is in the Directorate of Intelligence when he already knew that she worked in CPD in the Directorate of Operations.

Faulty memory, confusion? Or just creating the "I didn't know she was a spy, I thought she was an analyst" cover for himself?

One would construe that Libby was creating an alibi to cover the fact he knew what he was doing was not merely talking about a CIA analyst or even releasing classified info, but revealing the identity of a CIA agent in Operations where the spies are. Is this alone enough to prove that he knew she was on the books as a NOC? I don't know and just on the basis of what is in the indictment, perhaps not. I would assume Fitz has looked into that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. anyone who follows what is going on in Illinois
on a daily basis know just actually what fitzgerald can do. he`s destroying the ryan machine and he`ll start on daley next...so many criminals, so little time.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. One good apple in a bushel of rotten ones. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps Scooter will want to talk a little more now, problem is
he'll have to point to documents, records and emails to be believed. Though, if he wants to finger Cheney or Rove, it would be useful to see the interplay of fratricide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for this piece....
it gives me hope that I'll see Rove indicted.
Fitzgerald, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks
for your post. I hear some TV pundits say Fitz is probably just finishing up paperwork, but articles like this suggest otherwise. If he were doing that, I don't think he'd have said, "It's not over."

I look for something more to happen in the case. Hope it's Rove and Cheney going down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. competence times 10....hope to get more from him :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. So how does he go about getting the truth? From the statement below
he's saying he can't determine if treason has occured because Libby is lying. Maybe Cheney should authorize "torture" to get the truth from his man. :sarcasm:




And without the "truth" from Libby, Fitzgerald, investigating who outed a CIA agent -- the wife of an Iraq war critic -- said he is not in a position to know if a "serious national security crime" has been committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bizarro World....
Fitzgerald seems not to see the forest for the trees...

And yet that might be part of his strategy...

Libby's immediate resignation seems to show that he did hit some nail right on the head. But it's taken all this time to achieve just this?

Why did he go after Libby and Miller when Miller didn't even actually publish one of the pieces which blew Valerie Plame's cover?

Is Karl Rove or Dick Cheney "Official A"?

Fitzgerald believes that he's established that Dick Cheney actually informed Scooter about Plame and Wilson. And that Plame was in the COUNTER PROLIFFERATION department of the CIA. That is, professionally interested in the Iraqi nukes issue. He's gone a bit out of his way to establish this...he must think it's important.

Very mysterious indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe Friday was a little Halloween treat...with more presents to come!!
Stay tuned! I, for one, can't wait?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Frankly the long lingering stink of these crimes needs to permeate
the air.

And in the meantime our economy is tanked.

Let a few of these "Repubiclans" lose their jobs and homes like the democrats and be 'squashed' by the Republican job ethics and lack of help, and a few will get smart stop voting Republicans.

Funny thing I've noticed is the more they make, the less inclined they are to be democratic. I wonder why...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC