Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First White House Aide indicted in 130 years!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:29 PM
Original message
First White House Aide indicted in 130 years!!!
Now Scoobie makes it to the History Books!!!

On Fox News, former presidential advisor Dick Morris says today’s events don’t bode well for Dick Cheney:

JOHN GIBSON: How bad is this damage? And what does the president need to control it, Dick?
DICK MORRIS: Well, it depends on whether we are just talking about Libby. If the prosecutor is happy with an indictment of him, a conviction, and that scalp on the wall is sufficient for him, then it just goes away. It’s one bad chapter and it passes.

But it is very possible that the prosecutor looks up the food chain to Vice President Cheney. These investigations have a way of rising. And according to the terms of the indictment, Cheney told Libby about Valerie Plame and then Libby lied to the grand jury about how he found about it, saying that he got it from a reporter. Well, if that’s the case, the vice president knew that Libby was lying. <...>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/10/29/think-progress-dick-morr_n_9740.html

So if Dick gets to testify under oath with Scoobie Doo's case
I can imagine the first question to Dick is gonna be

Dick why would you and Scoobie talk about Valerie Plame???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unrepuke Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. So who is the guy 130 years ago, and what happened to him?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't know but this is like looking at a repeat page in history!!!
The Disputed Election of 1876

Washington corruption had been exposed. The Republicans nominated Rutherford B. Hayes who had a pure reputation as a Governor and General. The Democrats chose NY Governor Samuel J. Tilden who helped break up the Tweed Ring in New York City. There was much fraud in this election, on both sides. One month before the inauguration was to occur, Congress created an election commission to decide who had really won The commission had one more Republican than Democrat, and it was determined that the Republican Hayes had won. Less biased observers have determined that Tilden should have been the winner. Democrats were very upset, there were threats of filibusters and marches on Washington.
http://members.aol.com/RAmann2996/American_History.html

Kinda freaky isn't it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Keith Olbermann mentioned it a few days ago...
Included in these appointees was Grant's personal secretary, Orville E. Babcock. Even though the prosecutor had mounds of evidence against him, Babcock was acquitted and he resigned. Grant, furious with Bristow's findings about Babcock, forced him to resign from the cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. People in Watergate didn't get indicted? How bout Coorsgate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The others all resigned before they were indicted.
Scooter is the first person in 130 years to be indicted while still working in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ahh - okay. I see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Has anybody heard of Kraite Mobilier
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 02:55 PM by lovuian
in 1870???

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/gergen/october96/sabato_10-14.html

David Gergen chats with Larry Sabato, author of Dirty Little Secrets, about the fifty year cycle of corruption in American politics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DAVID GERGEN: In your book, you and Glen Simpson paint a portrait of corruption in American politics that stretches back for well over a century. You say there’s been a persistent pattern of corruption, stretching all the way back to Grant, if not earlier, and that you see a rising tide of corruption today across the American landscape. Let’s talk first about the pattern, the persistent pattern over our--over our history.

LARRY SABATO, Author, “Dirty Little Secrets”: Well, David, that’s right. There really is a cycle of corruption and reform throughout all of American history. We found an odd 50-year pattern. We’ve had three great scandals in American life: Kraite Mobilier in the early 1870's.

DAVID GERGEN: During the Grant administration.

LARRY SABATO: During the Grant administration, then exactly 50 years later, Teapot Dome during the Harding administration in the early 20's, and then Watergate in the early 70's in the Nixon administration. And after each of these great mega scandals, there was an attempt, a national attempt at reform of some sort which succeeded at least for a few years. But after a generation had passed, the press goes on to other subjects, the public loses interest, and the political system returns to stasis, which unfortunately is a corrupt stasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Credit Mobilier was the name of the scandal if I remember my history
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 04:42 PM by SharonAnn
http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_021900_crditmobilie.htm

CRÉDIT MOBILIER OF AMERICA
The Crédit Mobilier scandal of 1872-1873 damaged the careers of several Gilded Age politicians. Major stockholders in the Union Pacific Railroad formed a company, the Crédit Mobilier of America, and gave it contracts to build the railroad. They sold or gave shares in this construction to influential congressmen. It was a lucrative deal for the congressmen, because they helped themselves by approving federal subsidies for the cost of railroad construction without paying much attention to expenses, enabling railroad builders to make huge profits. When the New York Sun broke the story on the eve of the 1872 election, Speaker of the House James G. Blaine, a Maine Republican implicated in the scandal, set up a congressional committee to investigate.

The House censured two of its members who were involved in the scandal: Oakes Ames of Massachusetts and James Brooks of New York. But the affair also tarnished the careers of outgoing vice president Schuyler Colfax, incoming vice president Henry Wilson, and Representative James A. Garfield, all of whom were implicated (although Garfield denied the charges and was subsequently elected president).

The scandal also showed how corruption tainted Gilded Age politics, and the lengths railroads and other economic interests would go to assure and increase profits.

See also Corruption.
http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_020900_corruption.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unrepuke Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So W can brag "Ah broke thet there fitty year c'rupitation scandal thang."
the BFEE decided not to wait for the kids to step up to the plate in 15 years - HW and the Gorgon won't be around to see it happen. I hope they get to see their creation get dumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC