Why wasn't the 2000 election the focus of the GAO investigation/decision?
This may be a long shot scenario but I just wonder if this new revelation about the illegitimate election will be used at some point to legally remove Bush from office and replace him with the truly elected prez? If that's the case, then by focusing on the 2004 rather than the 2000 election, it would give us Kerry rather than Gore.
So that is why I'm asking the question about why the 2000 election which had just as much corruption involved with it...if not more...is not the focus of these investigations?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.