Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radar as Death Ray?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 08:43 AM
Original message
Radar as Death Ray?
<snip>

According to Aviation Week, the Pentagon is now developing active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars that could be used as weapons.

A bizarre historical twist to this story is that in 1934, a rumor was started to the effect that Nazi Germany had developed a death ray based on radar. Physicist Robert Watson-Watt was asked to check on the feasibility of such a weapon.

<snip>

Now it appears that AESA radars may have a weapons component. AESA radars are comprised of many small transmit/receive modules that each scan a fixed area; the antenna does not need to move to scan an area. They have an extremely fast scanning rate, higher range, multiple target engagement and can act as a jamming device.

<snip> Much much more here:
http://www.livescience.com/scienceoffiction/051024_death_ray.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. My understanding, military AC radar systems already damaging
At short ranges, at least, I believe existing military radar systems are already damaging. Very similar to microwave radiation. Technicians take care to not stand directly infront of them when they are to be activated, lest they cook ones innards.

The idea of using them as a weapon, in an academic sense, is intriguing. Missiles have time of flight issues. Guns also, as well as being limited to firing just straight ahead. Using an AESA as a weapon would give an aircraft an aimable, instant hit capability, if it could be focused well enough to concentrate the energies sufficiently at a distance.

Out of the academic sense (ie: now thinking of this as something to use against people) it seems just as abhorrent as using bullets or bombs for the same purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC