Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grasping at straws(Freeps regarding the indictments)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hobo_baggins Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:26 PM
Original message
Grasping at straws(Freeps regarding the indictments)
I was checking out what the freepers had to say about the indictments that seem inevitable, and the excuses range from denial that any crime was committed, technicalities that make what they did perfectly legal, to a CIA plot against the president that made it necessary for them to break the law to protect the United States.

By now I think its pretty obvious even to the freepers that at the very least, the Bush administration did something very very fucked up. Im wondering if the shoe was on the other foot, we'd have the moral clarity to call our people out on it, or if we'd be making stupid excuses like them, I know that no matter what, theres gonna be people who won't believe on either side, but I like to pride myself on being part of the thinkers, and able to tell when im being fucked over, regardless if its a dem or repub doing the fucking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Speaking for me
I'll call bullshit wherever I see it.

It's one of the reasons I consider myself an independent progressive. Only PART of the Democratic Party speaks for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobo_baggins Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thats how i feel too
I mean, when I look at the whole clinton thing...I don't think that his private life should have been made public, and its a shame that it came to that, but the minute he lied under oath, thats another story. I liked Clinton as a president, but i'll be the first to admit he fucked that situation up royally. It seems like a large portion of the right are unable to accept that any mistakes are made on their end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I had to laugh at the whole
"lying to congress" thing.

Ummm...like THAT'S anything unusual. They probably lie to each other all the time.

I consider Clinton one hell of a politician...anyone who can parse the word "is" has far more talent than I have, that's for sure.

Yeah, he screwed up big time. But I think he was also dancing through a minefield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. BTW, welcome to DU
:hi: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Of course
The only thing Clinton did wrong with the country is he lied and that's against the law. This whole ordeal shouldn't have been made public anyways. It was between the Clinton's and whomever they were dealing with at the point whether Lewinsky or Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Private Matter Yes, Public Figure, Yes...
It's one thing when a private individual's life is brought into the public and torn apart. It's another thing when it's a public figure...someone who uses the public for their own profit/advancement/power. Be it a politician, celebrity or anyone else who regularly steps in front of a camera, barks into a mike or has their name splashed on a byline. These people have crossed from the private to the public realm. While their private lives should be respected, if they attempt to represent one side of the street and it's shown they walk on the other, this information should be made public and the public judges the credibility of that individual.

Clinton did two things wrong. He lied to a judge in the discovery of a civil case. It wasn't a trial, it wasn't a criminal proceeding...it was what was later judged to be a frivolous lawsuit. Nonetheless, Clinton lied and that lie not only resulted in the impeachment circus and inquisition, but also a pretty hefty fine.

The other thing he did wrong was lie to the American people. Yes, he lied about "no having sex with that woman". We both will probaly say "big deal" and that it was/is/always will be a matter that only mattered to him, his wife and his immediate family, but for others, this was a breech of trust that was fueled by opportunists and repugnican operatives to destroy Clinton's effectiveness. I suspect Democrats will do the same thing to booosh, and justifyably for the same reasons.

I wish Clinton had come out and said "ok, so I messed around, so what". That would have saved us a year of right wing moralistic bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. yeah, if he would have said "i got a bj, and?",, there would have
been a month of handwringing and that would have been about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Hi hobo_baggins!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You hit the nail on the head
Bullshit is bullshit, whether it's Dem or Rethug. Corruption must NEVER be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yep
Remember when FDR tried to pack the SCOTUS? The democrats stud up to him and told him he was wrong. If that happened now? Not a single person in the republican party would be doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Ummm...no...
I don't remember that. LOL. But I get your point. I hadn't heard that before, but it doesn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Yep, I remember reading about it
These neocon Rethugs have no honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Freepers' champion has been pissing in his own bucket
for one term plus, and now the results are beginning to trickle in from the lab:

GUILTY.

Let the indictments flow and let the Freepers reap what they have sown. They enabled this little monster to steal two elections and they can just lick it off the floor from this point forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. They could have pictures of rove sodomizing a 5 year old and would
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 11:31 PM by The_Casual_Observer
have some kind of god damned excuse. You know they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Unless it was on a Sunday during church time and the 5 year old was
African American...nothing freeps hate worse than secularism...except maybe inter-racial relationships.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. They would still make excuses. Guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. And then they'd follow the teachings of the bible; blame the kid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Freeptards can be fun: A few favorites :)
My first question about this whole deal was WHY IN HELL was Joe Wilson chosen to go to Niger, a country not even specified in the 16 words in the SOTU speech, and this ignores the fact that Joe Wilson went to Niger before the 16 words were even uttered

******

Were the bogus docs classified at the time Wilson went to Niger?

******

Not lie, he was mislead by Clinton.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1508560/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Clinton?
Oh of course. They can't have anything without having Clinton involved. :crazy: Bunch of loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. We all know that
if this happened under any democratic administration they would've been impeached immediatley. I mean c'mon $60 BILLION was spent on Clinton and all they got was his penis. Of course they're in denial. In their mind, because the republicans wrap themselves in religion, they're perfect and above all of this. They're in for a shocker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. The evil CIA/State Dept. plot stuff comes from the RW talking points
the likes of Rush and Hannity have been pushing this, as has JimRob himself.

It's really awful, because nobody wants to believe that a president/vice-president could be that corrupt.

That's at least half of the reason that the Congress voted for this war; nobody could believe that the patriotic fervor on the heels of the catastrophe which was 9/11 would be used for such purposes as empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. random thoughts from freeperville
--"Don't worry, Rove is in the clear. Any other indictments are meaningless. The lefties only care about Rove. The best part will be the investigation into the CIA roll after this."

--"If he decides not to indict anyone, I am going to laugh my head off at the lamestream media."

--"I think two things are going on here:
1 - in the absense of leaks, the press has to write nonsense like this to keep the story going, and
2 - make all kinds of unsubstantiated allegations based on anonymous sources that damage Bush and Rove, just in case no indictments against Rove are handed down."

--"I'm willing to wager that NO ONE will be convicted of ANYTHING. However, the way the American press works, the story is the indictment, and the trial. Guilt is absolutely irrelevant."

--"Chris Matthews is giddy tonight...it is sickening to watch."

--"I wonder what the MSM will say when Fitzgerald makers it clear that, as defined by the statute, Plame was never outted? Ooops, never mind?"

--"I'm beginning to think the WH leaked that Rove and Libby might be indicted just to see the left go crazy when they weren't.
Hey, George W. was brought up in a CIA household, with his father as Chief. He knows how to play.

--""I find this very distasteful and very Liberal & Democratic."

--"I on the other hand view this as the RNC waking up and smelling the coffee. Hope it's not to late."

:boring:





















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Here's the one I liked best.
To: journalist3072
"She put her life on the line for her country, to work on issues of weapons of mass destruction, and her government repaid her by outing her for purely political reasons."

Actually, Plame herself - by recommending her husband for a high-profile assignment, her CIA superiors who approved it, and Wilson, who blabbed to the press with false information which aroused the ire of the White House, are the primary people responsible for her "outing," which was apparently a poorly-kept secret in DC prior to all this.

520 posted on 10/25/2005 7:08:07 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle

---------------------------------------------

I guess I just like the way "Steve_Seattle" shoehorned so many standard Freeper talking points into a single sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC