|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:28 AM Original message |
Saddam has not had WMDs since the mid-'90s ---- discuss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. He didn't dare let the neighboring countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yeah but if he didn't want provoke the U.S. he wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. But he did have oil. It's not accident that Iraq is oil-rich and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Oil was definately A reason for going in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Hi, Ignacio Upton. You've got a string of bingos there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Another good point. Bush regarded the inspectors generally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 04:22 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Wish granted; HE DIDN'T. The UN withdrew the inspectors when Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. He was a eunuch bragging about the size of his balls. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Exactly! n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. Maybe Clinton bombed it all in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 12:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Question, didn't Scott Ritter support the war in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 01:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Opposed the war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. He's a megalomaniacal nutjob |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
14. Don't think he was thumbing his nose at anyone by late 2002... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
15. Deleted message |
rfkrfk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
17. what about the Uranium? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 05:23 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's not quite it. Iraq had that yellowcake for years under UN seal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfkrfk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-23-05 05:57 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. thanks for that info, plus a comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC