Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those under the illusion that Miers was not picked to protect Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:10 PM
Original message
For those under the illusion that Miers was not picked to protect Bush
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 02:11 PM by Generator
Read this:

snip~
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/politics/politicsspecial1/20confirm.html?ei=5094&en=19c8ac980653a543&hp=&ex=1129780800&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1129834859-twKatvjopkqtLWsBaLNMug



The letter also faulted Ms. Miers, who was President Bush's personal lawyer before entering the White House, for answering a question about potential conflicts of interest on the bench by merely citing ethics laws.

"We are aware of statutes and codes that generally govern these matters," the senators wrote, "but recusal decisions of Supreme Court justices are more complicated because they are not subject to further review."

"Please be more specific," the senators wrote, referring to how she might handle recusals in "cases arising out of matters on which you worked at the White House, or as a lawyer for President Bush in his personal capacity, or in service to his various campaigns."

Not subject to further review. Get it? She doesn't have to recuse herself. Then what is anybody going to do about it when she of course does NOTHING but Bush's bidding. That's right-nothing. And she aint gonna recuse herself.

snip~

Democratic aides, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the inquiry, said they had in mind cases arising from antiterrorism legislation or the torture of prisoners of war, among others.

Ya think? Oh yeah-free pass for torture from our Bush loving gal Harriet. But at least she gives out M&M's in her office. (my husband read this little personal tidbit about her)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. protecting bush & Rove thumbing nose at Cheney
Still say she is part of the pissing contest between Karl and Dick. An important part, cuz she is so enamored of bush that Rove probably counts on her to keep his ass outta prison too, ya know, since he is bush*s brain and all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Scalia really lowered the bar
On recusals when he wnt duck hunting with Cheney while the Energy Commission disclosure case was being considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Scailia kicked the bar, thumbed his nose at it, mooned it.
He's an ass and perhaps a crooked one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course
I thought that since day one about her. It's too obvious. If she was a judge for the fundies they would've made this known since day one and everything. Why else were they so secretive about her? Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Most people on DU know
how bush operates by now. What a deadly joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. She and Roberts were picked because they are corporate attorneys
and will further erode workers rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC