It's from Sludge but I thought it was interesting:

[timber84]

sorry link was wrong trying to correct

Sorry try this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/19/politics/19leak.html?ei=5065&en=0e57747b579626c9&ex=1130385600&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

[patrice]

1. If the CIA hasnot done a damage assessment,

how could Fitzgerald deliver a final report?

[timber84]

2. did u get it when i pulled it back up it was a ralph lauren ad?

[patrice]

3. I don't remember a Ralph Lauren ad.

Please post again.

[timber84]

4. I'm truly not ver functional on the computer but I try.

When I wnet back to check my initial posting I click on the link I posted and got a ralph lauren add but then saw the skip add tab in the corner and then was directed back to the story.

[electropop]

6. Could it be that Fitz does not consider this to be the "last word"

so a "final" report is inappropriate? Perhaps he believes others will follow in his footsteps, opening the case wider and perhaps tying it to Abramoff and everything else.

He'll issue a pile of indictments, and we'll await the sequel.

[electropop]

5. Very interesting analysis.

Can we get indictments and a report? It all does appear to lead to a stack of indictments at this point.