Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Schieffer: "Is It The Beginning Of The End?" (CIA Leak - Watergate)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:45 AM
Original message
Bob Schieffer: "Is It The Beginning Of The End?" (CIA Leak - Watergate)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/17/opinion/schieffer/main949015.shtml

Is It The Beginning Of The End?
(CBS) Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News anchor and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.




Even as Watergate was at the boiling point, the Nixon White House maintained it was never a distraction to the president and his people. "The press may be consumed by it," they always said, "but we have more important things to do: running the government."

Once the famous tapes came out, of course, we all knew otherwise. Nixon and his people had been thinking of little but Watergate and how to cover their tracks.

Which is why White House press secretary Scott McClellan's words about the current investigation into who blew the cover of that secret agent for the CIA had such a familiar ring. "The White House doesn't have time to let these things distract us from the important work at hand," he said.

Oh, sure. A special prosecutor is bearing down, the president's top people are being called before a federal grand jury on a regular basis — four times so far for Karl Rove — the investigation has revealed a vicious secret war between the White House and the CIA over who should take the blame for the wrong intelligence that took us to war, and it's just another day in the office?

Maybe preoccupation with all of this is why nothing seems to be going right at the White House anymore. As for this investigation, it looks like it's coming to a conclusion, but watching the White House reaction makes me wonder: Is this story just beginning?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can you imagine how this has to be driving bush** crazy, the comparison
to the Nixon administration?

It cracks me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Almost makes it worth losing the election
Almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. one prob...
he's getting his SC nominees, where the slots weren't open in term 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yeah the only consolation is that this amin. still has a few years to
run out the clock and during that time all of their dirty laundry will have to air out and be cleaned. I would have still rather have had my counted instead of having this duffis picking out SC nominess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Maybe IF we had lost it Having it stolen will never be acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
46. Well I'm not one who buys
the stolen vote theory this time. Last time, yeah, but I have yet to be convinced this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Not Buying the Stolen Vote Theory
Well, ask yourself:

Why would they install inherently untrustworthy machines unless they
intended to use them?

Why would they cover over an honest election in Ohio with a crooked,
illegal recount?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #47
62. Dupe -- posted in wrong place
Edited on Wed Oct-19-05 07:11 AM by Fly by night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #46
63. Rip van Winkle -- this is your wake-up call.
These days, particularly at DU, it's "hard work" not to be exposed to the overwhelming evidence of election fraud/theft in 2004 (and before). Mosey over to the "Election Reform" forum if you haven't before and spend as much time as you have available reviewing the evidence there. There's a year's worth of threads available on this topic.

Or you might visit your library and read Christopher Hitchen's Vanity Fair piece, "What went wrong in Ohio?" or Mark Crispin Miller's Harper's piece, "None Dare Call It Stolen" or the Washington Spectator's "Voting: It Still Doesn't Work the Way it Should" or even this month's cover story about the 2004 stolen election in Mother Jones. Or any of the dozens (if not hundreds) of other well-researched articles on the Rethugs having the motive, means and opportunity to steal our elections.

It's late 2005 -- do you know who your voting machine voted for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. A stack of evidence
shows Kerry did not lose the election.

But I almost agree. If bush goes down it's almost worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. When the whole Puke establishment goes down in flames...
thanks to the treason case and the Abramoff case, they will find themselves in the wilderness for 40 years again. Maybe it will teach them a lesson this time.

And yeah, to really get rid of them for a very long time, it may be worth the theft of 3 elections. Hard to say, because so much of the damage will take a good 40 years to repair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
55. Correction
They were only "in the wilderness" for 6 years after Nixon. The 40 years was after Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. Nothing is worth that imo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. The EXACT same thing my co-worker said the other day
He said it's almost worth it to have Bush back in there, just to see all the crooks get their just due!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. We need to keep up the comparison between nixon and moron*...
More side by side photos, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. He doesn't know...
he doesn't read newspapers, watch tv, or (God forbid) read blogs and there isn't a single member of his staff who has the cajones to tell him that he's being compared to Nixon.

He is oblivious to criticism.

He is living in a bubble.

He is clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Please, a glory hound like that guy would never pass up anything with
his name or (especially) picture in it. Why do you think he looks like death on a soda cracker? He knows what's being said, what people think, and that the whole world has seen through the facade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. oh my-- seeing those two photos juxtaposed is almost as good...
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 11:51 AM by mike_c
...as seeing these would be:



He. Is. Toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:59 AM
Original message
I don't understand
this man! * I mean...When did it become ok to flip people off? As the "moral, Christian" President, shouldn't he be above this behavior? I am, according to the high and mighty conservatives, a morally bankrupt, liberal, tree hugging, democrat! I don't go around flipping people off! This administration still contines to shock and amaze me with their childish antics...*sigh* Is it 2008 yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. I've never been sure that particular picture is real.
I know of others that are, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. Poor Barney has to avert his eyes: "I can't believe I'm with this a..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Well, since he is neither moral nor Christian, I guess he thinks it's
A Okay to flip people off, especially since he thinks he is above most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbajai Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. That picture...
Where did you get that, and what is the context? Who was he flippin' off? I have seen a video where * does this but never this pic. Wow...guess his "moral" behavior happens more frequently than we thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. just did a google search on "bush"....
I don't know the context, whether the pic is real, or what. I just wanted a pic of the village idiot that was approximately the same size as the Hitler pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush will be gone by August 2006.
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 11:55 AM by electropop
My bet, anyway. The Pukes can no longer afford the damage he is doing to their chances in '06 and will have to flush him well before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Back in early 1999
when I 1st heard whistle ass was going to run, I turned to a friend and said, mark my words, he's going to go out just like Nixon - if by some miracle he gets elected.

What a delicious irony it would be, if whistle ass resigned or was impeached on August 8, 2005.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow! When even Schieffer comes out and makes such comparisons...
you know something VERY BIG is up.

This should be a very, very interesting next couple of weeks and beyond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. We Can Only Hope
This is encouraging that Scheiffer is writing this though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Funny Thing is......
The Reagan Administration had more Indictments and Convictions than Nixon's. Who knows what the Chimp's Gang will bring us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Did you see him grin yesterday after he said this
at the end of the show? I swear - he was grinning from ear to ear, and his eyes lit up like a kid who got what he wanted for Christmas.
This was his commentary at the end of his show yesterday, and you could tell he was very, very excited. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. This seems to be more evidence that what's to come is going to be...
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 12:27 PM by stevietheman
a lot bigger than the public (including DUers) expects, and the media is going to have a 9/11-level story to report for weeks, if not months. They smell the profits.

Note: November sweeps are coming up shortly! Perfect timing, Fitz! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Thanks for that info.
I can't stand to turn on TV news any more (except occasionally KO), so I only know stuff like that when someone mentions it here. It sounds pretty telling to me. It may be that everyone in D.C. and the press knows stuff now just as they all apparently knew that the whole rationale for invading Iraq was a pack of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. I recommend this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. I heard Bob say that yesterday AM.
`All I could think of at the time was "This is the LAST of the real reporters."

I sure don't hear those kind of remarks from any of the younger ones!

He's right too! I remember hearing Nixon's WH guys saying the same words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kicked and recommended.. Schieffer is awesome.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. Schieffer is "awesome" only occasionally...I remember too well his role
in the presidential debates. IMHO, he is as guilty as Miller is, for his role in electing this trash heap, and Miller's for getting us into an illegal and criminal war.

GIVE ME DAN RATHER ANY DAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
61. No, he isn't as guilty as Miller.......
Miller had special access to info that very few others did. People made the mistake of believing her, but they are not as guilty as she is. She had access to everything and lied. He didn't have the access, he isn't as guilty. I'm not saying he's perfect, but he isn't carrying the water now, and she still is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. The vanishing speck George Bush sees in his rearview mirror:
His last chance at a positive legacy. The Republican myth machine did wonders for Reagan, but no amount of spin can fix the damage that * has done. It is comforting to see the MSM coming back to life, I just wish it would have been before the 2004 elections. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. It is become clearer
the reasons why the DEMS had to lose in 2004. It is the only we would be able to go through the purging of the Repug party that we are about to experience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. If it is the end, Bob
Somehow I have a feeling that it will sneak right by you and your presstitute colleagues, who have been so supportive of the corrupt Bush administration and its shenanigans up until now. You and your media cohort have ignored a whole host of murderous and picayune lies, made excuses for outright criminal behavior over and over again, watched mutely as surpluses have turned to deficits, the Treasury has been emptied into the pockets of the overrich (including yourselves), and thousands of people have been wrongly imprisoned, tortured, maimed, and killed by this outlaw regime.

The fact that we have been at war for over two years based on wrong intelligence has so far escaped media scrutiny, and credulous reporting has supported the administration line time and again, even when the contrary facts were staring you in the face.

Is this story just beginning? Fer crissakes, man, it's been going on for years right before your eyes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. Your post is true. Gratuitously Yours. ............n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
methinks2 Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. thanks for the link
I missed the show on Sunday. Love the man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mad props to Governor George W. Bush
The man who single-handedly combined Vietnam and Watergate into one single presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. If the pet rats are abandoning the ship, things must be really bad.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. Fire the popcorn machine
consittutional crisis coming down the pike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. Know who's giving YOU the finger now Bush?
DAN RATHER!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. And how I miss...
Sam Donaldson. Told it like it was. He'd have * shaking in his boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. Blood in the water.
Nothing the press likes more than the righteous indignation that comes with a good political scandal--especially when there's so much irony involved. Restoring honor and dignity to the White House and all that. They're all licking their chops, champing at the bit, and all the other animal metaphors for "gettin' ready to rumble."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Interesting.
When Bob talks that way, you know something is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. Even better" On Friday NBC compared * to Catrer in terms of
inflation - "Not since the days of President Jimmy Carter has inflation......."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. "It's just a partisan witch hunt."
That's what I keep hearing republicans say.

Of course, they also say that Ken Starr's obscene, perverted investigation of a blowjob was justified.

A blowjob more important than traitorous acts by high officers of our government. That's how brainwashed these twits have become from listening to non-stop Limbaugh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. When they say that I shoot back with "like Ken Starr's hootenanny" That
always makes them mad. *lol*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. Spider's Web: The Secret History of How the WH Secretly Armed Iraq
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 02:54 PM by EVDebs
http://www.namebase.org/sources/UL.html

This is the story that Bill Clinton promised to investigate if he got elected, but now (January 1994) it appears that his handlers have other plans. It's about how the White House, with assistance from allies in London and Rome, violated the law in order to support Saddam Hussein. Then, following the invasion of Kuwait, George Bush compared him to Hitler, set up the American response, and he and Margaret Thatcher began covering up their past dealings. The story involves the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL), the Department of Agriculture's Commodity Credit Corporation, Iraq's nuclear procurement program, and the CIA and Carlos Cardoen (a Chilean arms dealer). Given this ten-year history, it was not unreasonable for Saddam Hussein to assume that U.S. ambassador April Glaspie was giving him the green light to invade Kuwait. And maybe she was; perhaps Bush thought he needed a quick-fix war to try out the Pentagon's new toys and crank up his popularity.
Alan Friedman is an American citizen who began covering Iraqgate while serving as the Milan correspondent for the Financial Times of London. His book includes 74 pages of reproduced bank and government documents, as well as extensive end notes.
ISBN 0-553-09650-8

This explains why Bill is so hesitant to criticize GHWB. The JFK incident explains why Harriet was nominated for SCOTUS, in order to keep anything tying the BFEE from ever coming out until after 2035 when everyone will have passed on by.

You can't very well have a war based upon WMDs and precursors that DADDY's administration provided to Saddam, now, can you, and let the whole world in on 'our little secret'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Please start this as a separate thread! It deserves its own post and
space for comments. Please, please, pretty please?

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Your wish is my command, wisebutangrysara.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Yes, this merits its own thread, and pls include pic of Rumsfeld
heartily shaking Saddam Hussein's hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Here's that picture at National Security Archive
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 06:37 PM by EVDebs
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

The site has an excellent listing of the history and documents of how the White House illegally armed Iraq. No wonder they didn't find WMDs, they may have had 'made in USA' on them !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlsmith1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. I Love How it's Driving Them Nuts!
It's about time that *they* suffered, considering how much they have made the American people suffer. I'm not turning cartwheels yet, since Bush & the others are pretty scary, but it's nice to know that they are the ones going through Hell now. It's a start.

Tammy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. Nixon was a zillion times smarter than Boosh!
Both are crooks and liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
51. It's like one of the fires that builds up inside a building, then ...
BOOM! It explodes everywhere into fire.

That is going to happen. When these indictments come down, BOOM!


today is a new ...
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. You allude to Farenheit 451 degrees , the temperature at which
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 06:41 PM by EVDebs
paper burns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
52. I think there is a difference between Bush
and Nixon. Maybe the comparison would fit more between Cheney and Nixon.

Nixon was a control freak, whereas Bush just likes to sort of be in charge, but let a lot of other people actually come up with ideas and plans.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
59. ahaha that photo is simply awesome.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
60. It's the unraveling of the justification for war in Iraq. THE LIES.
and they all should go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC